Fetching the paper…
Reading the bibliography…
Meta-learning is increasingly used to support the recommendation of machine learning algorithms and their configurations.
Hotelling, H., 1933. Analysis of a complex of statistical variables with principal components. Journal of Educational Psychology 24, 417–441
1933
Earlier work this paper cites.
Breiman, L., Friedman, J., Olshen, R. A., Stone, C. J., 1984. Classification and Regression Trees. Chapman and Hall
1984
Earlier work this paper cites.
Rodgers, J. L., Nicewander, W. A., 1988. Thirteen ways to look at the correlation coefficient. The American Statistician 42 (1), 59 – 66
1988
Earlier work this paper cites.
Wolpert, D. H., 1992. Stacked generalization. Neural Networks 5 (2), 241 – 259
1992
Earlier work this paper cites.
Fayyad, U. M., Irani, K. B., 1993. Multi-interval discretization of continuous-valued attributes for classification learning. In: 13th International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence (IJCAI). pp. 1022–1029
1993
Earlier work this paper cites.
Brazdil, P., Gama, J., Henery, B., 1994. Characterizing the applicability of classification algorithms using meta-level learning. In: 7th European Conference on Machine Learning (ECML). pp. 83 – 102
1994
Earlier work this paper cites.
Michie, D., Spiegelhalter, D. J., Taylor, C. C., 1994. Machine Learning, Neural and Statistical Classification. Ellis Horwood
1994
Earlier work this paper cites.
Royston, P., 1995. Remark AS R94: A remark on algorithm AS 181: The W-test for normality. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society. Series C (Applied Statistics) 44 (4), 547 – 551
1995
Earlier work this paper cites.
Mitchell, T. M., 1997. Machine Learning. McGraw Hill
1997
Earlier work this paper cites.
Engels, R., Theusinger, C., 1998. Using a data metric for preprocessing advice for data mining applications. In: 13th European Conference on on Artificial Intelligence (ECAI). pp. 430 – 434
1998
Earlier work this paper cites.
Joanes, D. N., Gill, C. A., 1998. Comparing measures of sample skewness and kurtosis. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society 47 (1), 183 – 189
1998
Earlier work this paper cites.
Kalousis, A., Theoharis, T., 1999. NOEMON: Design, implementation and performance results of an intelligent assistant for classifier selection. Intelligent Data Analysis 3 (5), 319 – 337
1999
Earlier work this paper cites.
Lindner, G., Studer, R., 1999. AST: Support for algorithm selection with a CBR approach. In: European Conference on Principles of Data Mining and Knowledge Discovery (PKDD). pp. 418 – 423
1999
Earlier work this paper cites.
Sohn, S. Y., 1999. Meta analysis of classification algorithms for pattern recognition. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence 21 (11), 1137 – 1144
1999
Earlier work this paper cites.
Vilalta, R., 1999. Understanding accuracy performance through concept characterization and algorithm analysis. In: ECML Workshop on Recent Advances in Meta-Learning and Future Work. pp. 3–9
1999
Earlier work this paper cites.
Bensusan, H., Giraud-Carrier, C., 2000. Discovering task neighbourhoods through landmark learning performances. In: 4th European Conference on Principles of Data Mining and Knowledge Discovery (PKDD). pp. 325 – 330
2000
Earlier work this paper cites.
Bensusan, H., Giraud-Carrier, C., Kennedy, C., 2000. A higher-order approach to meta-learning. In: 10th International Conference Inductive Logic Programming (ILP). pp. 33 – 42
2000
Earlier work this paper cites.
Kopf, C., Taylor, C., Keller, J., 2000. Meta-Analysis: From data characterisation for meta-learning to meta-regression. In: PKDD Workshop on Data Mining, Decision Support,Meta-Learning and Inductive Logic Programming. pp. 15 – 26
2000
Earlier work this paper cites.
Pfahringer, B., Bensusan, H., Giraud-Carrier, C., 2000. Meta-learning by landmarking various learning algorithms. In: 17th International Conference on Machine Learning (ICML). pp. 743 – 750
2000
Earlier work this paper cites.
Todorovski, L., Brazdil, P., Soares, C., 2000. Report on the experiments with feature selection in meta-level learning. In: PKDD Workshop on Data Mining, Decision Support, Meta-Learning and Inductive Logic Programming. pp. 27 – 39
2000
Earlier work this paper cites.
Bensusan, H., Kalousis, A., 2001. Estimating the predictive accuracy of a classifier. In: 12th European Conference on Machine Learning (ECML). pp. 25 – 36
2001
Earlier work this paper cites.
Fürnkranz, J., Petrak, J., 2001. An evaluation of landmarking variants. In: 1st ECML/PKDD International Workshop on Integration and Collaboration Aspects of Data Mining, Decision Support and Meta-Learning (IDDM). pp. 57 – 68
2001
Earlier work this paper cites.
Mathworks, 2001. Statistics toolbox: for use with MATLAB: user’s guide
2001
Earlier work this paper cites.
Smith, K., Woo, F., Ciesielski, V., Ibrahim, R., 2001. Modelling the relationship between problem characteristics and data mining algorithm performance using neural networks. In: Smart Engineering System Design: Neural Networks, Fuzzy Logic, Evolutionary Programming, Data Mining, and Complex Systems. pp. 357 – 362
2001
Earlier work this paper cites.
Soares, C., Petrak, J., Brazdil, P., 2001. Sampling-based relative landmarks: Systematically test-driving algorithms before choosing. In: 10th Portuguese Conference on Artificial Intelligence (EPIA). pp. 88 – 95
2001
Earlier work this paper cites.
Ho, T. K., Basu, M., 2002. Complexity measures of supervised classification problems. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence 24 (3), 289–300
2002
Earlier work this paper cites.
Kalousis, A., 2002. Algorithm selection via meta-learning. Ph.D. thesis, Faculty of Science of the University of Geneva
2002
Earlier work this paper cites.
Kopf, C., Iglezakis, I., 2002. Combination of task description strategies and case base properties for meta-learning. In: 2nd ECML/PKDD International Workshop on Integration and Collaboration Aspects of Data Mining, Decision Support and Meta-Learning (IDDM). pp. 65 – 76
2002
Earlier work this paper cites.
Kuba, P., Brazdil, P., Soares, C., Woznica, A., 2002. Exploiting sampling and meta-learning for parameter setting for support vector machines. In: 8th IBERAMIA Workshop on Learning and Data Mining. pp. 209 – 216
2002
Earlier work this paper cites.
Vilalta, R., Drissi, Y., 2002. A characterization of difficult problems in classification. In: International Conference on Machine Learning and Applications (ICMLA). pp. 133–138
2002
Cited alongside, same era.
Brazdil, P. B., Soares, C., da Coasta, J. P., 2003. Ranking learning algorithms: Using ibl and meta-learning on accuracy and time results. Machine Learning 50 (3), 251–277
2003
Cited alongside, same era.
Castiello, C., Castellano, G., Fanelli, A. M., 2005. Meta-data: Characterization of input features for meta-learning. In: 2nd International Conference on Modeling Decisions for Artificial Intelligence (MDAI). pp. 457 – 468
2005
Cited alongside, same era.
Han, J., Kamber, M., Pei, J., 2005. Data Mining: Concepts and Techniques. Morgan Kaufmann
2005
Cited alongside, same era.
Handl, J., Knowles, J. D., Kell, D. B., 2005. Computational cluster validation in post-genomic data analysis. Bioinformatics 21 (15), 3201–3212
Sun, Q., Pfahringer, B., 2013. Pairwise meta-rules for better meta-learning-based algorithm ranking. Machine Learning 93 (1), 141–161
2013
Later among the works it cites.
Vanschoren, J., van Rijn, J. N., Bischl, B., Torgo, L., 2013. OpenML: Networked science in machine learning. ACM SIGKDD Explorations Newsletter 15 (2), 49 – 60
2013
Later among the works it cites.
Wang, G., Song, Q., Sun, H., Zhang, X., Xu, B., Zhou, Y., 2013. A feature subset selection algorithm automatic recommendation method. Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research 47, 1–34
2013
Later among the works it cites.
Balte, A., Pise, N., Kulkarni, P., 2014. Meta-learning with landmarking : A Survey. International Journal of Computer Applications 105 (8), 47 – 51
2014
Later among the works it cites.
Burton, S. H., Morris, R. G., Giraud-Carrier, C., West, J. H., Thackeray, R., 2014. Mining useful association rules from questionnaire data. Intelligent Data Analysis 18 (3), 479–494
alphaXiv searches the wider corpus for related work and actual follow-ups.
alphaXiv is searching for related work…
2005
Cited alongside, same era.
Leite, R., Brazdil, P., 2005. Predicting relative performance of classifiers from samples. In: 22nd International Conference on Machine Learning (ICML). Vol. 119. pp. 497–503
2005
Cited alongside, same era.
Tan, P.-N., Steinbach, M., Kumar, V., 2005. Introduction to Data Mining. Addison-Wesley Longman Publishing
2005
Cited alongside, same era.
Ali, S., Smith, K. A., 2006. On learning algorithm selection for classification. Applied Soft Computing 6 (2), 119 – 138
2006
Cited alongside, same era.
Ali, S., Smith-Miles, K. A., 2006. A meta-learning approach to automatic kernel selection for support vector machines. Neurocomputing 70 (1), 173 – 186
2006
Cited alongside, same era.
Mierswa, I., Wurst, M., Klinkenberg, R., Scholz, M., Euler, T., 2006. YALE: rapid prototyping for complex data mining tasks. In: 12th International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining (KDD). pp. 935 – 940
2006
Cited alongside, same era.
Jin, R., Breitbart, Y., Muoh, C., 2007. Data discretization unification. In: 7th International Conference on Data Mining (ICDM). pp. 183–192
2007
Cited alongside, same era.
Lee, J. W., Giraud-Carrier, C., 2008. Predicting algorithm accuracy with a small set of effective meta-features. In: 7th International Conference on Machine Learning and Applications (ICMLA). pp. 808–812
2008
Cited alongside, same era.
2014
Later among the works it cites.
Feurer, M., Springenberg, J. T., Hutter, F., 2014. Using meta-learning to initialize bayesian optimization of hyperparameters. In: International Conference on Meta-learning and Algorithm Selection (MLAS). pp. 3 – 10
2014
Later among the works it cites.
Loh, W.-Y., 2014. Fifty years of classification and regression trees. International Statistical Review 82 (3), 329 – 348
2014
Later among the works it cites.
Reif, M., Shafait, F., Goldstein, M., Breuel, T., Dengel, A., 2014. Automatic classifier selection for non-experts. Pattern Analysis and Applications 17 (1), 83 – 96
2014
Later among the works it cites.
Smith, M. R., Martinez, T., Giraud-Carrier, C., 2014. An instance level analysis of data complexity. Machine Learning 95 (2), 225–256
2014
Later among the works it cites.
Aggarwal, C. C., 2015. Data Mining. Springer International Publishing
2015
Later among the works it cites.
Ferrari, D. G., de Castro, L. N., 2015. Clustering algorithm selection by meta-learning systems: A new distance-based problem characterization and ranking combination methods. Information Sciences 301, 181–194
2015
Later among the works it cites.
Filchenkov, A., Pendryak, A., 2015. Datasets meta-feature description for recommending feature selection algorithm. In: Artificial Intelligence and Natural Language and Information Extraction, Social Media and Web Search FRUCT Conference (AINL-ISMW FRUCT). pp. 11 – 18
2015
Later among the works it cites.
Garcia, L. P. F., de Carvalho, A. C. P. L. F., Lorena, A. C., 2015. Noise detection in the meta-learning level. Neurocomputing 176 (2), 1 – 12
2015
Later among the works it cites.
Lemke, C., Budka, M., Gabrys, B., 2015. Metalearning: a survey of trends and technologies. Artificial Intelligence Review 44 (1), 117 – 130
2015
Later among the works it cites.
Luengo, J., Herrera, F., 2015. An automatic extraction method of the domains of competence for learning classifiers using data complexity measures. Knowledge and Information Systems 42 (1), 147–180
2015
Later among the works it cites.
Wang, G., Song, Q., Zhu, X., 2015. An improved data characterization method and its application in classification algorithm recommendation. Applied Intelligence 43 (4), 892–912
2015
Later among the works it cites.
Pinto, F., Soares, C., Mendes-Moreira, J., 2016. Towards automatic generation of metafeatures. In: Pacific-Asia Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining (PAKDD). pp. 215 – 226
2016
Later among the works it cites.
Vukicevic, M., Radovanovic, S., Delibasic, B., Suknovic, M., 2016. Extending meta-learning framework for clustering gene expression data with component-based algorithm design and internal evaluation measures. International Journal of Data Mining and Bioinformatics (IJDMB) 14 (2), 101–119
2016
Later among the works it cites.
Bilalli, B., Abelló, A., Aluja-Banet, T., 2017. On the predictive power of meta-features in OpenML. International Journal of Applied Mathematics and Computer Science 27 (4), 697 – 712
2017
Later among the works it cites.
Barella, V. H., Garcia, L. P. F., de Souto, M. C. P., Lorena, A. C., de Carvalho, A. C. P. L. F., 2018. Data complexity measures for imbalanced classification tasks. In: 2018 International Joint Conference on Neural Networks, IJCNN 2018, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, July 8-13, 2018. IEEE, pp. 1–8
2018
Closest in time.
Bilalli, B., Abelló, A., Aluja-Banet, T., Wrembel, R., 2018. Intelligent assistance for data pre-processing. Computer Standards and Interfaces 57, 101 – 109
2018
Closest in time.
Garcia, L. P. F., Lorena, A. C., de Souto, M. C. P., Ho, T. K., 2018. Classifier recommendation using data complexity measures. In: 24th International Conference on Pattern Recognition, ICPR. pp. 874–879
2018
Closest in time.
Hutson, M., 2018. Artificial intelligence faces reproducibility crisis. Science 359 (6377), 725 – 726
2018
Closest in time.
Ler, D., Teng, H., He, Y., Gidijala, R., 2018. Algorithm selection for classification problems via cluster-based meta-features. In: IEEE International Conference on Big Data (Big Data). pp. 4952–4960
2018
Closest in time.
2018
Closest in time.
Muñoz, M. A., Villanova, L., Baatar, D., Smith-Miles, K., 2018. Instance spaces for machine learning classification. Machine Learning 107 (1), 109–147
2018
Closest in time.
Pimentel, B. A., de Carvalho, A. C. P. L. F., 2019. A new data characterization for selecting clustering algorithms using meta-learning. Information Sciences 477, 203–219
2019
Closest in time.
Kalousis, A., Hilario, M., 2001a. Feature selection for meta-learning. In: 5th Pacific-Asia Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining (PAKDD). Vol. 2035. pp. 222–233
2035
Closest in time.