Understand
Kearns et al.
- [2018] recently proposed a notion of rich subgroup fairness intended to bridge the gap between statistical and individual notions of fairness.
- Rich subgroup fairness picks a statistical fairness constraint (say, equalizing false positive rates across protected groups), but then asks that this constraint hold over an exponentially or infinitely large collection of subgroups defined by a class of functions with bounded VC dimension.
- They give an algorithm guaranteed to learn subject to this constraint, under the condition that it has access to oracles for perfectly learning absent a fairness constraint.
Built on
Lsac national longitudinal bar passage study
L. Wightman · 1998
Earlier work this paper cites.
A data-driven software tool for enabling cooperative information sharing among police departments
M.A. Redmond and A. Baveja · 2002
Earlier work this paper cites.
Using data mining to predict secondary school student performance
P. Cortez and A. Silva · 2008
Earlier work this paper cites.
Three naive bayes approaches for discrimination-free classification
Toon Calders and Sicco Verwer · 2010
Earlier work this paper cites.
Fairness through awareness
Cynthia Dwork, Moritz Hardt, Toniann Pitassi, Omer Reingold, and Richard Zemel · 2012
Earlier work this paper cites.
Similar
Equality of opportunity in supervised learning
Moritz Hardt, Eric Price, and Nati Srebro · 2016
Cited alongside, same era.
Fair prediction with disparate impact: A study of bias in recidivism prediction instruments
Alexandra Chouldechova · 2017
Cited alongside, same era.
UCI machine learning repository , 2017
Dua Dheeru and Efi Karra Taniskidou · 2017
Cited alongside, same era.
Inherent trade-offs in the fair determination of risk scores
Jon M. Kleinberg, Sendhil Mullainathan, and Manish Raghavan · 2017
Cited alongside, same era.
A reductions approach to fair classification
Alekh Agarwal, Alina Beygelzimer, Miroslav Dudík, John Langford, and Hanna M. Wallach · 2018
Cited alongside, same era.
Multiaccuracy: Black-box post-processing for fairness in classification
Michael P Kim, Amirata Ghorbani, and James Zou
Cited in the paper.
Fairness through computationally-bounded awareness
Michael P Kim, Omer Reingold, and Guy N Rothblum
Cited in the paper.
Then
Fairness in criminal justice risk assessments: The state of the art
Richard Berk, Hoda Heidari, Shahin Jabbari, Michael Kearns, and Aaron Roth · 2018
Closest in time.
Multicalibration: Calibration for the (computationally-identifiable) masses
Úrsula Hébert-Johnson, Michael P. Kim, Omer Reingold, and Guy N. Rothblum · 2018
Closest in time.
Preventing fairness gerrymandering: Auditing and learning for subgroup fairness
Michael J. Kearns, Seth Neel, Aaron Roth, and Zhiwei Steven Wu · 2018
Closest in time.
Learning non-discriminatory predictors
Blake Woodworth, Suriya Gunasekar, Mesrob I Ohannessian, and Nathan Srebro · 2018
Closest in time.
Beyond the bibliography
alphaXiv searches the wider corpus for related work and actual follow-ups.
alphaXiv is searching for related work…