2018

An Empirical Study of Rich Subgroup Fairness for Machine Learning

Kearns, Michael, Neel, Seth, Roth, Aaron et al.

Understand

Kearns et al.

  • [2018] recently proposed a notion of rich subgroup fairness intended to bridge the gap between statistical and individual notions of fairness.
  • Rich subgroup fairness picks a statistical fairness constraint (say, equalizing false positive rates across protected groups), but then asks that this constraint hold over an exponentially or infinitely large collection of subgroups defined by a class of functions with bounded VC dimension.
  • They give an algorithm guaranteed to learn subject to this constraint, under the condition that it has access to oracles for perfectly learning absent a fairness constraint.

Built on

  • Lsac national longitudinal bar passage study

    L. Wightman · 1998

    Earlier work this paper cites.

  • A data-driven software tool for enabling cooperative information sharing among police departments

    M.A. Redmond and A. Baveja · 2002

    Earlier work this paper cites.

  • Using data mining to predict secondary school student performance

    P. Cortez and A. Silva · 2008

    Earlier work this paper cites.

  • Three naive bayes approaches for discrimination-free classification

    Toon Calders and Sicco Verwer · 2010

    Earlier work this paper cites.

  • Fairness through awareness

    Cynthia Dwork, Moritz Hardt, Toniann Pitassi, Omer Reingold, and Richard Zemel · 2012

    Earlier work this paper cites.

Similar

  • Equality of opportunity in supervised learning

    Moritz Hardt, Eric Price, and Nati Srebro · 2016

    Cited alongside, same era.

  • Fair prediction with disparate impact: A study of bias in recidivism prediction instruments

    Alexandra Chouldechova · 2017

    Cited alongside, same era.

  • UCI machine learning repository , 2017

    Dua Dheeru and Efi Karra Taniskidou · 2017

    Cited alongside, same era.

  • Inherent trade-offs in the fair determination of risk scores

    Jon M. Kleinberg, Sendhil Mullainathan, and Manish Raghavan · 2017

    Cited alongside, same era.

  • A reductions approach to fair classification

    Alekh Agarwal, Alina Beygelzimer, Miroslav Dudík, John Langford, and Hanna M. Wallach · 2018

    Cited alongside, same era.

  • Multiaccuracy: Black-box post-processing for fairness in classification

    Original

    Michael P Kim, Amirata Ghorbani, and James Zou

    Cited in the paper.

  • Fairness through computationally-bounded awareness

    Original

    Michael P Kim, Omer Reingold, and Guy N Rothblum

    Cited in the paper.

Then

  • Fairness in criminal justice risk assessments: The state of the art

    Richard Berk, Hoda Heidari, Shahin Jabbari, Michael Kearns, and Aaron Roth · 2018

    Closest in time.

  • Multicalibration: Calibration for the (computationally-identifiable) masses

    Úrsula Hébert-Johnson, Michael P. Kim, Omer Reingold, and Guy N. Rothblum · 2018

    Closest in time.

  • Preventing fairness gerrymandering: Auditing and learning for subgroup fairness

    Michael J. Kearns, Seth Neel, Aaron Roth, and Zhiwei Steven Wu · 2018

    Closest in time.

  • Learning non-discriminatory predictors

    Blake Woodworth, Suriya Gunasekar, Mesrob I Ohannessian, and Nathan Srebro · 2018

    Closest in time.

Beyond the bibliography

alphaXiv searches the wider corpus for related work and actual follow-ups.

Open on alphaXiv

alphaXiv is searching for related work…