2018

Learning under selective labels in the presence of expert consistency

De-Arteaga, Maria, Dubrawski, Artur, Chouldechova, Alexandra

Understand

We explore the problem of learning under selective labels in the context of algorithm-assisted decision making.

  • Selective labels is a pervasive selection bias problem that arises when historical decision making blinds us to the true outcome for certain instances.
  • Examples of this are common in many applications, ranging from predicting recidivism using pre-trial release data to diagnosing patients.
  • In this paper we discuss why selective labels often cannot be effectively tackled by standard methods for adjusting for sample selection bias, even if there are no unobservables.

Built on

  • Clinical versus statistical prediction: A theoretical analysis and a review of the evidence

    Meehl, Paul E · 1954

    Earlier work this paper cites.

  • Clinical versus actuarial judgment

    Dawes, Robyn M, Faust, David, and Meehl, Paul E · 1989

    Earlier work this paper cites.

  • Competence in experts: The role of task characteristics

    Shanteau, James · 1992

    Earlier work this paper cites.

  • Clinical versus mechanical prediction: a meta-analysis

    Grove, William M, Zald, David H, Lebow, Boyd S, Snitz, Beth E, and Nelson, Chad · 2000

    Earlier work this paper cites.

  • Learning and evaluating classifiers under sample selection bias

    Zadrozny, Bianca · 2004

    Earlier work this paper cites.

Similar

  • Correcting sample selection bias by unlabeled data

    Huang, Jiayuan, Gretton, Arthur, Borgwardt, Karsten M, Schölkopf, Bernhard, and Smola, Alex J · 2007

    Cited alongside, same era.

  • Review of inverse probability weighting for dealing with missing data

    Seaman, Shaun R and White, Ian R · 2013

    Cited alongside, same era.

  • Statistical analysis with missing data

    Little, Roderick JA and Rubin, Donald B · 2014

    Cited alongside, same era.

  • Why task domains (still) matter for understanding expertise

    Shanteau, James · 2015

    Cited alongside, same era.

  • Learning with rejection

    Cortes, Corinna, DeSalvo, Giulia, and Mohri, Mehryar · 2016

    Cited alongside, same era.

Then

  • Bail Comissioner Handbook

    New Hampshire Judicial Branch · 2016

    Later among the works it cites.

  • Human decisions and machine predictions

    Kleinberg, Jon, Lakkaraju, Himabindu, Leskovec, Jure, Ludwig, Jens, and Mullainathan, Sendhil · 2017

    Later among the works it cites.

  • The selective labels problem: Evaluating algorithmic predictions in the presence of unobservables

    Lakkaraju, Himabindu, Kleinberg, Jon, Leskovec, Jure, Ludwig, Jens, and Mullainathan, Sendhil · 2017

    Later among the works it cites.

  • Predict responsibly: Increasing fairness by learning to defer

    Original

    Madras, David, Pitassi, Toniann, and Zemel, Richard · 2017

    Later among the works it cites.

  • Residual unfairness in fair machine learning from prejudiced data

    Original

    Kallus, Nathan and Zhou, Angela · 2018

    Closest in time.

Beyond the bibliography

alphaXiv searches the wider corpus for related work and actual follow-ups.

Open on alphaXiv

alphaXiv is searching for related work…