Fetching the paper…
Reading the bibliography…
Humans have a remarkable capacity to understand the physical dynamics of objects in their environment, flexibly capturing complex structures and interactions at multiple levels of detail.
Curvilinear motion in the absence of external forces: Naive beliefs about the motion of objects
M. McCloskey, A. Caramazza, and B. Green · 1980
Earlier work this paper cites.
Principles of object perception
E. S. Spelke · 1990
Earlier work this paper cites.
Origins of knowledge
E. S. Spelke, K. Breinlinger, J. Macomber, and K. Jacobson · 1992
Earlier work this paper cites.
Physics-based visual understanding
M. Brand · 1997
Earlier work this paper cites.
Neuroanimator: Fast neural network emulation and control of physics-based models
R. Grzeszczuk, D. Terzopoulos, and G. Hinton · 1998
Earlier work this paper cites.
Physically based modeling: Rigid body simulation
D. Baraff · 2001
Earlier work this paper cites.
Mechanical reasoning by mental simulation
M. Hegarty · 2004
Earlier work this paper cites.
The graph neural network model
F. Scarselli, M. Gori, A. C. Tsoi, M. Hagenbuchner, and G. Monfardini · 2009
Earlier work this paper cites.
Using matrices to model symbolic relationship
I. Sutskever and G. E. Hinton · 2009
Earlier work this paper cites.
Bullet physics engine
E. Coumans · 2010
Earlier work this paper cites.
Internal physics models guide probabilistic judgments about object dynamics
J. Hamrick, P. Battaglia, and J. B. Tenenbaum · 2011
Earlier work this paper cites.
How to grow a mind: Statistics, structure, and abstraction
J. B. Tenenbaum, C. Kemp, T. L. Griffiths, and N. D. Goodman · 2011
Earlier work this paper cites.
Simulation as an engine of physical scene understanding
P. W. Battaglia, J. B. Hamrick, and J. B. Tenenbaum · 2013
Earlier work this paper cites.
Spectral networks and locally connected networks on graphs
J. Bruna, W. Zaremba, A. Szlam, and Y. LeCun · 2013
Earlier work this paper cites.
Sources of uncertainty in intuitive physics
K. A. Smith and E. Vul · 2013
Earlier work this paper cites.
Inverse graphics with probabilistic cad models
T. D. Kulkarni, V. K. Mansinghka, P. Kohli, and J. B. Tenenbaum · 2014
Earlier work this paper cites.
Unified particle physics for real-time applications
M. Macklin, M. Müller, N. Chentanez, and T.-Y. Kim · 2014
Cited alongside, same era.
Learning physics from dynamical scenes
T. Ullman, A. Stuhlmüller, N. Goodman, and J. B. Tenenbaum · 2014
Cited alongside, same era.
Humans predict liquid dynamics using probabilistic simulation
C. Bates, P. Battaglia, I. Yildirim, and J. B. Tenenbaum · 2015
Cited alongside, same era.
Position-based simulation methods in computer graphics
J. Bender, M. Müller, and M. Macklin · 2015
Cited alongside, same era.
Convolutional networks on graphs for learning molecular fingerprints
D. K. Duvenaud, D. Maclaurin, J. Iparraguirre, R. Bombarell, T. Hirzel, A. Aspuru-Guzik, and R. P. Adams · 2015
Cited alongside, same era.
Learning visual predictive models of physics for playing billiards
Semi-supervised classification with graph convolutional networks
T. N. Kipf and M. Welling · 2016
Later among the works it cites.
Learning physical intuition of block towers by example
A. Lerer, S. Gross, and R. Fergus · 2016
Later among the works it cites.
To fall or not to fall: A visual approach to physical stability prediction
W. Li, S. Azimi, A. Leonardis, and M. Fritz · 2016
Later among the works it cites.
Deep end2end voxel2voxel prediction
D. Tran, L. Bourdev, R. Fergus, L. Torresani, and M. Paluri · 2016
Later among the works it cites.
Understanding visual concepts with continuation learning
W. F. Whitney, M. Chang, T. Kulkarni, and J. B. Tenenbaum · 2016
alphaXiv searches the wider corpus for related work and actual follow-ups.
alphaXiv is searching for related work…
K. Fragkiadaki, P. Agrawal, S. Levine, and J. Malik · 2015
Cited alongside, same era.
Deep convolutional networks on graph-structured data
M. Henaff, J. Bruna, and Y. LeCun · 2015
Cited alongside, same era.
Deep convolutional inverse graphics network
T. D. Kulkarni, W. F. Whitney, P. Kohli, and J. Tenenbaum · 2015
Cited alongside, same era.
Gated graph sequence neural networks
Y. Li, D. Tarlow, M. Brockschmidt, and R. Zemel · 2015
Cited alongside, same era.
Learning spatiotemporal features with 3d convolutional networks
D. Tran, L. Bourdev, R. Fergus, L. Torresani, and M. Paluri · 2015
Cited alongside, same era.
Galileo: Perceiving physical object properties by integrating a physics engine with deep learning
J. Wu, I. Yildirim, J. J. Lim, B. Freeman, and J. Tenenbaum · 2015
Cited alongside, same era.
Learning to poke by poking: Experiential learning of intuitive physics
P. Agrawal, A. V. Nair, P. Abbeel, J. Malik, and S. Levine · 2016
Cited alongside, same era.
Later among the works it cites.
Geometric deep learning: going beyond euclidean data
M. M. Bronstein, J. Bruna, Y. LeCun, A. Szlam, and P. Vandergheynst · 2017
Later among the works it cites.
Se3-nets: Learning rigid body motion using deep neural networks
A. Byravan and D. Fox · 2017
Later among the works it cites.
A point set generation network for 3d object reconstruction from a single image
H. Fan, H. Su, and L. J. Guibas · 2017
Later among the works it cites.
Building machines that learn and think like people
B. M. Lake, T. D. Ullman, J. B. Tenenbaum, and S. J. Gershman · 2017
Later among the works it cites.
Modeling relational data with graph convolutional networks
M. Schlichtkrull, T. N. Kipf, P. Bloem, R. v. d. Berg, I. Titov, and M. Welling · 2017
Later among the works it cites.
N. Watters, A. Tacchetti, T. Weber, R. Pascanu, P. Battaglia, and D. Zoran · 2017
Later among the works it cites.
Learning to play with intrinsically-motivated self-aware agents
N. Haber, D. Mrowca, L. Fei-Fei, and D. L. Yamins · 2018
Closest in time.
Neural relational inference for interacting systems
T. Kipf, E. Fetaya, K.-C. Wang, M. Welling, and R. Zemel · 2018
Closest in time.
Probing physics knowledge using tools from developmental psychology
L. Piloto, A. Weinstein, A. Ahuja, M. Mirza, G. Wayne, D. Amos, C.-c. Hung, and M. Botvinick · 2018
Closest in time.
Intphys: A framework and benchmark for visual intuitive physics reasoning
R. Riochet, M. Y. Castro, M. Bernard, A. Lerer, R. Fergus, V. Izard, and E. Dupoux · 2018
Closest in time.
3d-physnet: Learning the intuitive physics of non-rigid object deformations
Z. Wang, S. Rosa, B. Yang, S. Wang, N. Trigoni, and A. Markham · 2018
Closest in time.