Fetching the paper…
Reading the bibliography…
For natural language understanding (NLU) technology to be maximally useful, both practically and as a scientific object of study, it must be general: it must be able to process language in a way that is not exclusively tailored to any one specific task or dataset.
Comparison of the predicted and observed secondary structure of t4 phage lysozyme
Brian W Matthews · 1975
Earlier work this paper cites.
Using the framework
Robin Cooper, Dick Crouch, Jan Van Eijck, Chris Fox, Josef Van Genabith, Jan Jaspars, Hans Kamp, David Milward, Manfred Pinkal, Massimo Poesio, Steve Pulman, Ted Briscoe, Holger Maier, and Karsten Konrad · 1996
Earlier work this paper cites.
The TREC-8 question answering track report
Ellen M Voorhees et al · 1999
Earlier work this paper cites.
Comparing two k-category assignments by a k-category correlation coefficient
Jan Gorodkin · 2004
Earlier work this paper cites.
Mining and summarizing customer reviews
Minqing Hu and Bing Liu · 2004
Earlier work this paper cites.
A sentimental education: Sentiment analysis using subjectivity summarization based on minimum cuts
Bo Pang and Lillian Lee · 2004
Earlier work this paper cites.
Automatically constructing a corpus of sentential paraphrases
William B Dolan and Chris Brockett · 2005
Earlier work this paper cites.
Seeing stars: Exploiting class relationships for sentiment categorization with respect to rating scales
Bo Pang and Lillian Lee · 2005
Earlier work this paper cites.
Annotating expressions of opinions and emotions in language
Janyce Wiebe, Theresa Wilson, and Claire Cardie · 2005
Earlier work this paper cites.
The second PASCAL recognising textual entailment challenge
Roy Bar Haim, Ido Dagan, Bill Dolan, Lisa Ferro, Danilo Giampiccolo, Bernardo Magnini, and Idan Szpektor · 2006
Earlier work this paper cites.
The PASCAL recognising textual entailment challenge
Ido Dagan, Oren Glickman, and Bernardo Magnini · 2006
Earlier work this paper cites.
The third PASCAL recognizing textual entailment challenge
Danilo Giampiccolo, Bernardo Magnini, Ido Dagan, and Bill Dolan · 2007
Earlier work this paper cites.
The fifth PASCAL recognizing textual entailment challenge
Luisa Bentivogli, Ido Dagan, Hoa Trang Dang, Danilo Giampiccolo, and Bernardo Magnini · 2009
Earlier work this paper cites.
Natural language processing (almost) from scratch
Ronan Collobert, Jason Weston, Léon Bottou, Michael Karlen, Koray Kavukcuoglu, and Pavel Kuksa · 2011
Earlier work this paper cites.
The Winograd schema challenge
Hector J Levesque, Ernest Davis, and Leora Morgenstern · 2011
Earlier work this paper cites.
One billion word benchmark for measuring progress in statistical language modeling
Ciprian Chelba, Tomas Mikolov, Mike Schuster, Qi Ge, Thorsten Brants, Phillipp Koehn, and Tony Robinson · 2013
Earlier work this paper cites.
Recursive deep models for semantic compositionality over a sentiment treebank
Richard Socher, Alex Perelygin, Jean Wu, Jason Chuang, Christopher D Manning, Andrew Ng, and Christopher Potts · 2013
Earlier work this paper cites.
Distributed representations of sentences and documents
Quoc Le and Tomas Mikolov · 2014
Earlier work this paper cites.
GloVe: Global vectors for word representation
Jeffrey Pennington, Richard Socher, and Christopher Manning · 2014
Cited alongside, same era.
Neural machine translation by jointly learning to align and translate
Dzmitry Bahdanau, Kyunghyun Cho, and Yoshua Bengio · 2015
Cited alongside, same era.
A large annotated corpus for learning natural language inference
Samuel R. Bowman, Gabor Angeli, Christopher Potts, and Christopher D. Manning · 2015
Cited alongside, same era.
Adam: A method for stochastic optimization
Diederik P Kingma and Jimmy Ba · 2015
Cited alongside, same era.
Skip-Thought vectors
Ryan Kiros, Yukun Zhu, Ruslan R Salakhutdinov, Richard Zemel, Raquel Urtasun, Antonio Torralba, and Sanja Fidler · 2015
Cited alongside, same era.
Aligning books and movies: Towards story-like visual explanations by watching movies and reading books
Yukun Zhu, Ryan Kiros, Rich Zemel, Ruslan Salakhutdinov, Raquel Urtasun, Antonio Torralba, and Sanja Fidler · 2015
Dissent: Sentence representation learning from explicit discourse relations
Allen Nie, Erin D Bennett, and Noah D Goodman · 2017
Later among the works it cites.
Sluice networks: Learning what to share between loosely related tasks
Sebastian Ruder, Joachim Bingel, Isabelle Augenstein, and Anders Søgaard · 2017
Later among the works it cites.
The effect of different writing tasks on linguistic style: A case study of the ROC story cloze task
Roy Schwartz, Maarten Sap, Ioannis Konstas, Li Zilles, Yejin Choi, and Noah A. Smith · 2017
Later among the works it cites.
Bidirectional attention flow for machine comprehension
Minjoon Seo, Aniruddha Kembhavi, Ali Farhadi, and Hannaneh Hajishirzi · 2017
Later among the works it cites.
Attention is all you need
Ashish Vaswani, Noam Shazeer, Niki Parmar, Jakob Uszkoreit, Llion Jones, Aidan N Gomez, Łukasz Kaiser, and Illia Polosukhin · 2017
Later among the works it cites.
Inference is everything: Recasting semantic resources into a unified evaluation framework
alphaXiv searches the wider corpus for related work and actual follow-ups.
alphaXiv is searching for related work…
Cited alongside, same era.
Learning distributed representations of sentences from unlabelled data
Felix Hill, Kyunghyun Cho, and Anna Korhonen · 2016
Cited alongside, same era.
Bag of tricks for efficient text classification
Armand Joulin, Edouard Grave, Piotr Bojanowski, and Tomas Mikolov · 2016
Cited alongside, same era.
SQuAD: 100,000+ questions for machine comprehension of text
Pranav Rajpurkar, Jian Zhang, Konstantin Lopyrev, and Percy Liang · 2016
Cited alongside, same era.
Reasoning about entailment with neural attention
Tim Rocktäschel, Edward Grefenstette, Moritz Hermann, Karl, Tomáš Kočiskỳ, and Phil Blunsom · 2016
Cited alongside, same era.
Deep multi-task learning with low level tasks supervised at lower layers
Anders Søgaard and Yoav Goldberg · 2016
Cited alongside, same era.
Semeval-2017 task 1: Semantic textual similarity-multilingual and cross-lingual focused evaluation
Daniel Cer, Mona Diab, Eneko Agirre, Inigo Lopez-Gazpio, and Lucia Specia · 2017
Cited alongside, same era.
Aaron Steven White, Pushpendre Rastogi, Kevin Duh, and Benjamin Van Durme · 2017
Later among the works it cites.
SentEval: An evaluation toolkit for universal sentence representations
Alexis Conneau and Douwe Kiela · 2018
Closest in time.
Transforming question answering datasets into natural language inference datasets
Dorottya Demszky, Kelvin Guu, and Percy Liang · 2018
Closest in time.
Annotation artifacts in natural language inference data
Suchin Gururangan, Swabha Swayamdipta, Omer Levy, Roy Schwartz, Samuel R. Bowman, and Noah A. Smith · 2018
Closest in time.
The natural language decathlon: Multitask learning as question answering
Bryan McCann, Nitish Shirish Keskar, Caiming Xiong, and Richard Socher · 2018
Closest in time.
Deep contextualized word representations
Matthew E Peters, Mark Neumann, Mohit Iyyer, Matt Gardner, Christopher Clark, Kenton Lee, and Luke Zettlemoyer · 2018
Closest in time.
Hypothesis only baselines in natural language inference
Adam Poliak, Jason Naradowsky, Aparajita Haldar, Rachel Rudinger, and Benjamin Van Durme · 2018
Closest in time.
Learning general purpose distributed sentence representations via large scale multi-task learning
Sandeep Subramanian, Adam Trischler, Yoshua Bengio, and Christopher J. Pal · 2018
Closest in time.
Performance Impact Caused by Hidden Bias of Training Data for Recognizing Textual Entailment
Masatoshi Tsuchiya · 2018
Closest in time.
Neural network acceptability judgments
Alex Warstadt, Amanpreet Singh, and Samuel R Bowman · 2018
Closest in time.
A broad-coverage challenge corpus for sentence understanding through inference
Adina Williams, Nikita Nangia, and Samuel R. Bowman · 2018
Closest in time.
Non-entailed subsequences as a challenge for natural language inference
R. Thomas McCoy and Tal Linzen · 2019
Closest in time.