Built on

A. Alloul, N. D. Christensen, C. Degrande, C. Duhr, and B. Fuks, “FeynRules 2.0 - A complete toolbox for tree-level phenomenology,” Comput. Phys. Commun
Original
1921
Earlier work this paper cites.
L. J. Hall, T. Moroi, and H. Murayama, “Sneutrino cold dark matter with lepton number violation,” Phys. Lett
1998
Earlier work this paper cites.
D. Tucker-Smith and N. Weiner, “Inelastic dark matter,” Phys. Rev
2001
Earlier work this paper cites.
M. Cirelli, N. Fornengo, and A. Strumia, “Minimal dark matter,” Nucl. Phys
2006
Earlier work this paper cites.
S. Chang, G. D. Kribs, D. Tucker-Smith, and N. Weiner, “Inelastic Dark Matter in Light of DAMA/LIBRA,” Phys. Rev
Original
2009
Earlier work this paper cites.
Y. Cui, D. E. Morrissey, D. Poland, and L. Randall, “Candidates for Inelastic Dark Matter,” JHEP
Original
2009
Earlier work this paper cites.
N. Arkani-Hamed, D. P. Finkbeiner, T. R. Slatyer, and N. Weiner, “A Theory of Dark Matter,” Phys. Rev
Original
2009
Earlier work this paper cites.
N. D. Christensen and C. Duhr, “FeynRules - Feynman rules made easy,” Comput. Phys. Commun
Original
2009
Earlier work this paper cites.
A. De Simone, V. Sanz, and H. P. Sato, “Pseudo-Dirac Dark Matter Leaves a Trace,” Phys. Rev. Lett
Original
2010
Earlier work this paper cites.
I. M. Shoemaker and L. Vecchi, “Unitarity and Monojet Bounds on Models for DAMA, CoGeNT, and CRESST-II,” Phys. Rev
Original
2012
Earlier work this paper cites.
A. L. Fitzpatrick, W. Haxton, E. Katz, N. Lubbers, and Y. Xu, “The Effective Field Theory of Dark Matter Direct Detection,” JCAP
Original
2013
Earlier work this paper cites.
M. Cirelli, E. Del Nobile, and P. Panci, “Tools for model-independent bounds in direct dark matter searches,” JCAP
Original
2013
Earlier work this paper cites.
N. Anand, A. L. Fitzpatrick, and W. C. Haxton, “Weakly interacting massive particle-nucleus elastic scattering response,” Phys. Rev
Original
2014
Earlier work this paper cites.

Similar

G. Busoni, A. De Simone, E. Morgante, and A. Riotto, “On the Validity of the Effective Field Theory for Dark Matter Searches at the LHC,” Phys. Lett
Original
2014
Cited alongside, same era.
G. Busoni, A. De Simone, J. Gramling, E. Morgante, and A. Riotto, “On the Validity of the Effective Field Theory for Dark Matter Searches at the LHC, Part II: Complete Analysis for the s s -channel,” JCAP
Original
2014
Cited alongside, same era.
G. Busoni, A. De Simone, T. Jacques, E. Morgante, and A. Riotto, “On the Validity of the Effective Field Theory for Dark Matter Searches at the LHC Part III: Analysis for the t t -channel,” JCAP
Original
2014
Cited alongside, same era.
O. Buchmueller, M. J. Dolan, and C. McCabe, “Beyond Effective Field Theory for Dark Matter Searches at the LHC,” JHEP
Original
2014
Cited alongside, same era.

Then

P. S. Bhupal Dev and A. Pilaftsis, “Maximally Symmetric Two Higgs Doublet Model with Natural Standard Model Alignment,” JHEP
Original
2015
Later among the works it cites.
N. Bell, G. Busoni, A. Kobakhidze, D. M. Long, and M. A. Schmidt, “Unitarisation of EFT Amplitudes for Dark Matter Searches at the LHC,” JHEP
Original
2016
Later among the works it cites.
N. F. Bell, Y. Cai, and R. K. Leane, “Mono-W Dark Matter Signals at the LHC: Simplified Model Analysis,” JCAP
Original
2016
Later among the works it cites.
U. Haisch, F. Kahlhoefer, and T. M. P. Tait, “On Mono-W Signatures in Spin-1 Simplified Models,” Phys. Lett
Original
2016
Later among the works it cites.
F. Kahlhoefer, K. Schmidt-Hoberg, T. Schwetz, and S. Vogl, “Implications of unitarity and gauge invariance for simplified dark matter models,” JHEP

Beyond the bibliography

alphaXiv searches the wider corpus for related work and actual follow-ups.

Open on alphaXiv

alphaXiv is searching for related work…

Reading the bibliography…

2018

Loop Effects in Direct Detection

Bell, Nicole F., Busoni, Giorgio, Sanderson, Isaac W.

Understand

We consider loop level contributions to dark matter scattering off nucleons in cases where the spin independent scattering cross section is absent or suppressed at tree level.

In the case of a pseudoscalar interaction, for which the tree level cross section is both spin-dependent and suppressed by 4 powers of the exchanged momentum, we show that loop diagrams give rise to a non- zero spin independent cross section.
Importantly, if the pseudoscalar interaction is formulated using a gauge invariant framework, loop effects generate an effective $\bar{\chi}\chi h$ vertex and result in a scattering cross section that is within reach of current or forthcoming experiments.
We also consider the case of inelastic dark matter, for which the tree-level direct detection cross section is negligible when the inelastic $\chi_1 N \to \chi_2 N$ process is kinematically suppressed.