A computer program used for bail and sentencing decisions was labeled biased against blacks. it’s actually not that clear
Sam Corbett-Davies, Emma Pierson, Avi Feller, and Sharad Goel · 2016
Later among the works it cites.
Algorithmic transparency via quantitative input influence: theory and experiments with learning systems
Anupam Datta, Shayak Sen, and Yair Zick · 2016
Later among the works it cites.
How we analyzed the compas recidivism algorithm
Jeff Larson, Surya Mattu, Lauren Kirchner, and Julia Angwin · 2016
Later among the works it cites.
Prediction uncertainty and optimal experimental design for learning dynamical systems
Benjamin Letham, Portia A Letham, Cynthia Rudin, and Edward P Browne · 2016
Later among the works it cites.
To predict and serve?
Kristian Lum and William Isaac · 2016
Later among the works it cites.
Quantifying uncertainty in random forests via confidence intervals and hypothesis tests
Lucas Mentch and Giles Hooker · 2016
Later among the works it cites.
Risk assessment in criminal sentencing
John Monahan and Jennifer L Skeem · 2016
Later among the works it cites.
Investigation of the Baltimore City Police Department, August 2016
U.S. Department of Justice - Civil Rights Devision · 2016
Later among the works it cites.
An experimental study of the intrinsic stability of random forest variable importance measures
Huazhen Wang, Fan Yang, and Zhiyuan Luo · 2016
Later among the works it cites.
Fair prediction with disparate impact: a study of bias in recidivism prediction instruments
Alexandra Chouldechova · 2017
Later among the works it cites.
Algorithmic decision making and the cost of fairness
Sam Corbett-Davies, Emma Pierson, Avi Feller, Sharad Goel, and Aziz Huq · 2017
Later among the works it cites.
Correlation and variable importance in random forests
Baptiste Gregorutti, Bertrand Michel, and Philippe Saint-Pierre · 2017
Later among the works it cites.
Variable importance using decision trees
Jalil Kazemitabar, Arash Amini, Adam Bloniarz, and Ameet S Talwalkar · 2017
Later among the works it cites.
Inherent trade-offs in the fair determination of risk scores
Jon Kleinberg, Sendhil Mullainathan, and Manish Raghavan · 2017
Later among the works it cites.
Identifying a minimal class of models for high-dimensional data
Daniel Nevo and Ya’acov Ritov · 2017
Later among the works it cites.
General heuristics for nonconvex quadratically constrained quadratic programming
Original
Jaehyun Park and Stephen Boyd · 2017
Later among the works it cites.
Demystifying risk assessment, key principles and controversies
Sarah Picard-Fritsche, Michael Rempel, Jennifer A. Tallon, Julian Adler, and Natalie Reyes · 2017
Later among the works it cites.
Nonparametric variable importance assessment using machine learning techniques
Brian D Williamson, Peter B Gilbert, Noah Simon, and Marco Carone · 2017
Later among the works it cites.
A theory of statistical inference for ensuring the robustness of scientific results
Original
Beau Coker, Cynthia Rudin, and Gary King · 2018
Closest in time.
Fair inference on outcomes
Razieh Nabi and Ilya Shpitser · 2018
Closest in time.
Variable importance clouds: A way to explore variable importance for the set of good models
Original
Jiayun Dong and Cynthia Rudin · 2019
Closest in time.
Stop explaining black box machine learning models for high stakes decisions and use interpretable models instead
Cynthia Rudin · 2019
Closest in time.
The age of secrecy and unfairness in recidivism prediction
Cynthia Rudin, Caroline Wang, and Beau Coker · 2019
Closest in time.
A study in rashomon curves and volumes: a new perspective on generalization and model simplicity in machine learning
Original
Lesia Semenova and Cynthia Rudin · 2019
Closest in time.