Built on

J. Gleyzes, D. Langlois, F. Piazza and F. Vernizzi, JCAP 1502
Original
1952
Earlier work this paper cites.
C. Deffayet, S. Deser and G. Esposito-Farese, Phys. Rev. D 80
Original
1967
Earlier work this paper cites.
A. I. Vainshtein, Phys. Lett. B39
1972
Earlier work this paper cites.
G. W. Horndeski, Int. J. Theor. Phys. 10
1974
Earlier work this paper cites.
A. Nicolis, R. Rattazzi and E. Trincherini, Phys. Rev. D 79
Original
2009
Earlier work this paper cites.
C. Deffayet, G. Esposito-Farese and A. Vikman, Phys. Rev. D 79
Original
2009
Earlier work this paper cites.
C. Deffayet, X. Gao, D. A. Steer and G. Zahariade, Phys. Rev. D 84
Original
2011
Earlier work this paper cites.
T. Kobayashi, M. Yamaguchi and J. ’i. Yokoyama, Prog. Theor. Phys. 126
Original
2011
Earlier work this paper cites.
T. Clifton, P. G. Ferreira, A. Padilla and C. Skordis, Phys. Rept. 513
Original
2012
Earlier work this paper cites.
R. Kimura, T. Kobayashi and K. Yamamoto, Phys. Rev. D 85
Original
2012
Earlier work this paper cites.
K. Koyama, G. Niz and G. Tasinato, Phys. Rev. D 88
Original
2013
Earlier work this paper cites.
M. Zumalacarregui and J. Garcia-Bellido, Phys. Rev. D 89
Original
2014
Earlier work this paper cites.
E. Bellini and I. Sawicki, JCAP 1407
Original
2014
Earlier work this paper cites.
A. Joyce, B. Jain, J. Khoury and M. Trodden, Phys. Rept. 568
Original
2015
Earlier work this paper cites.
R. P. Woodard, Scholarpedia 10
Original
2015
Earlier work this paper cites.
J. Gleyzes, D. Langlois, F. Piazza and F. Vernizzi, Phys. Rev. Lett. 114
Original
2015
Earlier work this paper cites.

Similar

C. Deffayet, G. Esposito-Farese and D. A. Steer, Phys. Rev. D 92
Original
2015
Cited alongside, same era.
T. Kobayashi, Y. Watanabe and D. Yamauchi, Phys. Rev. D 91
Original
2015
Cited alongside, same era.
K. Koyama and J. Sakstein, Phys. Rev. D 91
Original
2015
Cited alongside, same era.
J. Gleyzes, D. Langlois and F. Vernizzi, Int. J. Mod. Phys. D 23
Original
2015
Cited alongside, same era.
R. Saito, D. Yamauchi, S. Mizuno, J. Gleyzes and D. Langlois, JCAP 1506
Original
2015
Cited alongside, same era.

Then

J. Ben Achour, M. Crisostomi, K. Koyama, D. Langlois, K. Noui and G. Tasinato, JHEP 1612
Original
2016
Later among the works it cites.
L. Lombriser and A. Taylor, JCAP 1603
Original
2016
Later among the works it cites.
C. de Rham and A. Matas, JCAP 1606
Original
2016
Later among the works it cites.
J. Beltran Jimenez, F. Piazza and H. Velten, Phys. Rev. Lett. 116
Original
2016
Later among the works it cites.
E. Babichev, K. Koyama, D. Langlois, R. Saito and J. Sakstein, Class. Quant. Grav. 33
Original
2016

Beyond the bibliography

alphaXiv searches the wider corpus for related work and actual follow-ups.

Open on alphaXiv

alphaXiv is searching for related work…

Reading the bibliography…

2017

Vainshtein mechanism after GW170817

Crisostomi, Marco, Koyama, Kazuya

Understand

The almost simultaneous detection of gravitational waves and a short gamma-ray burst from a neutron star merger has put a tight constraint on the difference between the speed of gravity and light.

In the four-dimensional scalar-tensor theory with second order equations of motion, the Horndeski theory, this translates into a significant reduction of the viable parameter space of the theory.
Recently, extensions of Horndeski theory, which are free from Ostrogradsky ghosts despite the presence of higher order derivatives in the equations of motion, have been identified and classified exploiting the degeneracy criterium.
In these new theories, the fifth force mediated by the scalar field must be suppressed in order to evade the stringent Solar System constraints.