Fetching the paper…
Reading the bibliography…
Training deep neural networks requires many training samples, but in practice training labels are expensive to obtain and may be of varying quality, as some may be from trusted expert labelers while others might be from heuristics or other sources of weak supervision such as crowd-sourcing.
On the specification of term values in automatic indexing
Gerard Salton and Chung-Shu Yang · 1973
Earlier work this paper cites.
Combining labeled and unlabeled data with co-training
Avrim Blum and Tom Mitchell · 1998
Earlier work this paper cites.
Statistical Learning Theory
Vladimir N. Vapnik · 1998
Earlier work this paper cites.
Identifying mislabeled training data
Carla E. Brodley and Mark A. Friedl · 1999
Earlier work this paper cites.
Umass at trec 2004: Novelty and hard
Nasreen Abdul-jaleel, James Allan, W. Bruce Croft, O Diaz, Leah Larkey, Xiaoyan Li, Mark D. Smucker, and Courtney Wade · 2004
Earlier work this paper cites.
Semi-supervised self-training of object detection models
Chuck Rosenberg, Martial Hebert, and Henry Schneiderman · 2005
Earlier work this paper cites.
Semi-Supervised Learning
Olivier Chapelle, Bernhard Schölkopf, and Alexander Zien · 2006
Earlier work this paper cites.
A fast learning algorithm for deep belief nets
Geoffrey E. Hinton, Simon Osindero, and Yee-Whye Teh · 2006
Earlier work this paper cites.
A picture of search
Greg Pass, Abdur Chowdhury, and Cayley Torgeson · 2006
Earlier work this paper cites.
Fast gaussian process regression using kd-trees
Yirong Shen, Matthias Seeger, and Andrew Y. Ng · 2006
Earlier work this paper cites.
Twitter sentiment classification using distant supervision
Alec Go, Richa Bhayani, and Lei Huang · 2009
Earlier work this paper cites.
Distant supervision for relation extraction without labeled data
Mike Mintz, Steven Bills, Rion Snow, and Dan Jurafsky · 2009
Earlier work this paper cites.
The probabilistic relevance framework: Bm25 and beyond
Stephen Robertson and Hugo Zaragoza · 2009
Earlier work this paper cites.
Variational learning of inducing variables in sparse gaussian processes
Michalis K. Titsias · 2009
Earlier work this paper cites.
A new learning paradigm: Learning using privileged information
Vladimir Vapnik and Akshay Vashist · 2009
Earlier work this paper cites.
Sentiwordnet 3.0: An enhanced lexical resource for sentiment analysis and opinion mining
Stefano Baccianella, Andrea Esuli, and Fabrizio Sebastiani · 2010
Earlier work this paper cites.
Structured output learning with indirect supervision
Ming-Wei Chang, Vivek Srikumar, Dan Goldwasser, and Dan Roth · 2010
Earlier work this paper cites.
Driving semantic parsing from the world’s response
James Clarke, Dan Goldwasser, Ming-Wei Chang, and Dan Roth · 2010
Earlier work this paper cites.
Rectified linear units improve restricted boltzmann machines
Vinod Nair and Geoffrey E. Hinton · 2010
Earlier work this paper cites.
Efficient and effective spam filtering and re-ranking for large web datasets
Gordon V. Cormack, Mark D. Smucker, and Charles L. Clarke · 2011
Earlier work this paper cites.
Privacy aware learning
Martin J. Wainwright, Michael I. Jordan, and John C. Duchi · 2012
Earlier work this paper cites.
Deep learning via semi-supervised embedding
Jason Weston, Frédéric Ratle, Hossein Mobahi, and Ronan Collobert · 2012
Earlier work this paper cites.
Experiments with dbpedia, wordnet and sentiwordnet as resources for sentiment analysis in micro-blogging
Hussam Hamdan, Frederic Béchet, and Patrice Bellot · 2013
Earlier work this paper cites.
Pseudo-label: The simple and efficient semi-supervised learning method for deep neural networks
Dong-Hyun Lee · 2013
Cited alongside, same era.
Distributed Representations of Words and Phrases and their Compositionality
Tomas Mikolov, Ilya Sutskever, Kai Chen, Greg S. Corrado, and Jeff Dean · 2013
Cited alongside, same era.
Distant supervision for relation extraction with an incomplete knowledge base
Bonan Min, Ralph Grishman, Li Wan, Chang Wang, and David Gondek · 2013
Cited alongside, same era.
Parallelizing exploration-exploitation tradeoffs in gaussian process bandit optimization
Thomas Desautels, Andreas Krause, and Joel W. Burdick · 2014
Cited alongside, same era.
Classification in the presence of label noise: a survey
Benoît Frénay and Michel Verleysen · 2014
Cited alongside, same era.
Unifying distillation and privileged information
David Lopez-Paz, Léon Bottou, Bernhard Schölkopf, and Vladimir Vapnik · 2016
Later among the works it cites.
Semeval-2016 task 4: Sentiment analysis in twitter
Preslav Nakov, Alan Ritter, Sara Rosenthal, Fabrizio Sebastiani, and Veselin Stoyanov · 2016
Later among the works it cites.
Unsupervised learning of visual representations by solving jigsaw puzzles
Mehdi Noroozi and Paolo Favaro · 2016
Later among the works it cites.
Loss factorization, weakly supervised learning and label noise robustness
Giorgio Patrini, Frank Nielsen, Richard Nock, and Marcello Carioni · 2016
Later among the works it cites.
Estimation from indirect supervision with linear moments
Aditi Raghunathan, Roy Frostig, John Duchi, and Percy Liang · 2016
Later among the works it cites.
alphaXiv searches the wider corpus for related work and actual follow-ups.
alphaXiv is searching for related work…
Geoffrey Hinton, Oriol Vinyals, and Jeff Dean · 2014
Cited alongside, same era.
Sentiment analysis of short informal texts
Svetlana Kiritchenko, Xiaodan Zhu, and Saif M. Mohammad · 2014
Cited alongside, same era.
Response-based learning for grounded machine translation
Stefan Riezler, Patrick Simianer, and Carolin Haas · 2014
Cited alongside, same era.
Dropout: A simple way to prevent neural networks from overfitting
Nitish Srivastava, Geoffrey Hinton, Alex Krizhevsky, Ilya Sutskever, and Ruslan Salakhutdinov · 2014
Cited alongside, same era.
TensorFlow: Large-scale machine learning on heterogeneous systems, 2015
Martín Abadi et al · 2015
Cited alongside, same era.
Scalable variational gaussian process classification
James Hensman, Alexander G. de G. Matthews, and Zoubin Ghahramani · 2015
Cited alongside, same era.
Adam: A method for stochastic optimization
Diederik Kingma and Jimmy Ba · 2015
Cited alongside, same era.
Alexander J. Ratner, Christopher M. De Sa, Sen Wu, Daniel Selsam, and Christopher Ré · 2016
Later among the works it cites.
Sensei-lif at semeval-2016 task 4: Polarity embedding fusion for robust sentiment analysis
Mickael Rouvier and Benoit Favre · 2016
Later among the works it cites.
Tf.learn: Tensorflow’s high-level module for distributed machine learning
Yuan Tang · 2016
Later among the works it cites.
Learning to learn from weak supervision by full supervision
Mostafa Dehghani, Aliaksei Severyn, Sascha Rothe, and Jaap Kamps · 2017
Closest in time.
Leveraging large amounts of weakly supervised data for multi-language sentiment classification
Jan Deriu, Aurelien Lucchi, Valeria De Luca, Aliaksei Severyn, Simon Müller, Mark Cieliebak, Thomas Hofmann, and Martin Jaggi · 2017
Closest in time.
Adversarial feature learning
Jeff Donahue, Philipp Krähenbühl, and Trevor Darrell · 2017
Closest in time.
Training deep neural-networks using a noise adaptation layer
Jacob Goldberger and Ehud Ben-Reuven · 2017
Closest in time.
Decoupling” when to update” from” how to update”
Eran Malach and Shai Shalev-Shwartz · 2017
Closest in time.
GPflow: A Gaussian process library using TensorFlow
Alexander G. de G. Matthews, Mark van der Wilk, Tom Nickson, Keisuke. Fujii, Alexis Boukouvalas, Pablo León-Villagrá, Zoubin Ghahramani, and James Hensman · 2017
Closest in time.
Semi-supervised knowledge transfer for deep learning from private training data
Nicolas Papernot, Martín Abadi, Úlfar Erlingsson, Ian Goodfellow, and Kunal Talwar · 2017
Closest in time.
Making neural networks robust to label noise: a loss correction approach
Giorgio Patrini, Alessandro Rozza, Aditya Menon, Richard Nock, and Lizhen Qu · 2017
Closest in time.
Holoclean: Holistic data repairs with probabilistic inference
Theodoros Rekatsinas, Xu Chu, Ihab F. Ilyas, and Christopher Ré · 2017
Closest in time.
Incidental supervision: Moving beyond supervised learning
Dan Roth · 2017
Closest in time.
Label-free supervision of neural networks with physics and domain knowledge
Russell Stewart and Stefano Ermon · 2017
Closest in time.
Toward robustness against label noise in training deep discriminative neural networks
Arash Vahdat · 2017
Closest in time.
Socratic learning: Correcting misspecified generative models using discriminative models
Paroma Varma, Bryan He, Dan Iter, Peng Xu, Rose Yu, Christopher De Sa, and Christopher Ré · 2017
Closest in time.
Learning from noisy large-scale datasets with minimal supervision
Andreas Veit, Neil Alldrin, Gal Chechik, Ivan Krasin, Abhinav Gupta, and Serge Belongie · 2017
Closest in time.