Understand
Encoder-decoder GANs architectures (e.g., BiGAN and ALI) seek to add an inference mechanism to the GANs setup, consisting of a small encoder deep net that maps data-points to their succinct encodings.
- The intuition is that being forced to train an encoder alongside the usual generator forces the system to learn meaningful mappings from the code to the data-point and vice-versa, which should improve the learning of the target distribution and ameliorate mode-collapse.
- It should also yield meaningful codes that are useful as features for downstream tasks.
- The current paper shows rigorously that even on real-life distributions of images, the encode-decoder GAN training objectives (a) cannot prevent mode collapse; i.e.
Built on
Generative adversarial nets
Ian Goodfellow, Jean Pouget-Abadie, Mehdi Mirza, Bing Xu, David Warde-Farley, Sherjil Ozair, Aaron Courville, and Yoshua Bengio · 2014
Earlier work this paper cites.
Do gans actually learn the distribution? an empirical study
Sanjeev Arora and Yi Zhang · 2017
Earlier work this paper cites.
Similar
Generalization and equilibrium in generative adversarial nets (gans)
Sanjeev Arora, Rong Ge, Yingyu Liang, Tengyu Ma, and Yi Zhang · 2017
Cited alongside, same era.
Adversarial feature learning
Jeff Donahue, Philipp Krähenbühl, and Trevor Darrell · 2017
Cited alongside, same era.
Then
Adversarially learned inference
Vincent Dumoulin, Ishmael Belghazi, Ben Poole, Alex Lamb, Martin Arjovsky, Olivier Mastropietro, and Aaron Courville · 2017
Closest in time.
Beyond the bibliography
alphaXiv searches the wider corpus for related work and actual follow-ups.
alphaXiv is searching for related work…