Fetching the paper…
Reading the bibliography…
We provide a fine-grained definition for monogamous measure of entanglement that does not invoke any particular monogamy relation.
M. Gerstenhaber. On nilalgebras and linear varieties of nilpotent matrices (I). Amer. J. Math
1958
Earlier work this paper cites.
M. Gerstenhaber. On nilalgebras and linear varieties of nilpotent matrices (I). Amer. J. Math
1958
Earlier work this paper cites.
S. Hill and W. K. Wootters. Entanglement of a pair of quantum bits. Phys. Rev. Lett
1997
Earlier work this paper cites.
W. K. Wootters. Entanglement of formation of an arbitrary state of two qubits. Phys. Rev. Lett
1998
Earlier work this paper cites.
W. K. Wootters. Entanglement of formation of an arbitrary state of two qubits. Phys. Rev. Lett
1998
Earlier work this paper cites.
DiVincenzo et al . Entanglement of Assistance. Lecture Notes in Computer Science
1999
Earlier work this paper cites.
M. J. Donald and M. Horodecki. Continuity of relative entropy of entanglement. Phys. Lett. A
1999
Earlier work this paper cites.
V. Coffman, J. Kundu, and W. K. Wootters. Distributed entanglement. Phys. Rev. A
2000
Earlier work this paper cites.
W. Dür, G. Vidal, and J. I. Cirac. Three qubits can be entangled in two inequivalent ways. Phys. Rev. A
2000
Earlier work this paper cites.
G. Vidal. Entanglement monotone. J. Mod. Opt
2000
Earlier work this paper cites.
V. Coffman, J. Kundu, and W. K. Wootters. Distributed entanglement. Phys. Rev. A
2000
Earlier work this paper cites.
P. W. Shor, J. A. Smolin, and B. M. Terhal. Nonadditivity of bipartite distillable entanglement follows from a conjecture on bound entangled Werner states. Phys. Rev. Lett
2001
Earlier work this paper cites.
K. G. H. Vollbrecht and R. F. Werner. Entanglement measures under symmetry. Phys. Rev. A
2001
Earlier work this paper cites.
N. Gisin, G. Ribordy, W. Tittel, and H. Zbinden. Quantum cryptography. Rev. Mod. Phys
2002
Earlier work this paper cites.
T. Laustsen, F. Verstraete, and S. J. van Enk. Local vs. joint measurements for the entanglement of assistance. Quant. Inf. Comput
2003
Earlier work this paper cites.
M. Koashi and A. Winter. Monogamy of quantum entanglement and other correlations. Phys. Rev. A
2004
Earlier work this paper cites.
B. M. Terhal. IBM Journal of Research and Development,48(1):71-78, 2004. doi:10.1147/rd.481.0071
2004
Earlier work this paper cites.
P. W. Shor. Equivalence of additivity questions in quantum information theory. Commun. Math. Phys
2004
Earlier work this paper cites.
P. Hayden, R. Jozsa, D. Petz, and A. Winter. Structure of states which satisfy strong subadditivity of quantum entropy with equality. Commun. Math. Phys
2004
Earlier work this paper cites.
M. Koashi and A. Winter. Monogamy of quantum entanglement and other correlations. Phys. Rev. A
2004
Earlier work this paper cites.
P. Hayden, R. Jozsa, D. Petz, and A. Winter. Structure of states which satisfy strong subadditivity of quantum entropy with equality. Commun. Math. Phys
2004
Earlier work this paper cites.
G. Gour, D. A. Meyer, and B. C. Sanders. Deterministic entanglement of assistance and monogamy constraints. Phys. Rev. A
2005
Earlier work this paper cites.
G. Gour. Family of concurrence monotones and its applications. Phys. Rev. A
2005
Earlier work this paper cites.
M. B. Plenio. Logarithmic negativity: a full entanglement monotone that is not convex. Phys. Rev. Lett
2005
Earlier work this paper cites.
G. Gour, D. A. Meyer, and B. C. Sanders. Deterministic entanglement of assistance and monogamy constraints. Phys. Rev. A
2005
Earlier work this paper cites.
T. J. Osborne and F. Verstraete. General monogamy inequality for bipartite qubit entanglement. Phys. Rev. Lett
2006
Earlier work this paper cites.
G. Gour and R. W. Spekkens. Entanglement of assistance is not a bipartite measure nor a tripartite monotone. Phys. Rev. A
2006
Earlier work this paper cites.
T. J. Osborne and F. Verstraete. General mnogamy inequality for bipartite qubit entanglement. Phys. Rev. Lett
2006
Earlier work this paper cites.
G. Gour and R. W. Spekkens. Entanglement of assistance is not a bipartite measure nor a tripartite monotone. Phys. Rev. A
2006
Earlier work this paper cites.
Y.-C. Ou and H. Fan, Monogamy inequality in terms of negativity for three-qubit states. Phys. Rev. A
2007
Earlier work this paper cites.
G. Gour, S. Bandyopadhyay, and B. C. Sanders. Dual monogamy inequality for entanglement. J. Math. Phys
2007
Earlier work this paper cites.
Y.-C. Ou. Violation of monogamy inequality for higher dimensional objects. Phys. Rev. A
2007
Earlier work this paper cites.
T. Hiroshima, G. Adesso and F. Illuminati. Monogamy inequality for distributed Gaussian entanglement. Phys. Rev. Lett
2007
Earlier work this paper cites.
G. Adesso and F. Illuminati. Strong monogamy of bipartite and genuine multipartite entanglement: The Gaussian case. Phys. Rev. Lett
2007
Cited alongside, same era.
Y.-C. Ou. Violation of monogamy inequality for higher dimensional objects. Phys. Rev. A
2007
Cited alongside, same era.
Y.-C. Ou and H. Fan, Monogamy inequality in terms of negativity for three-qubit states. Phys. Rev. A
2007
Cited alongside, same era.
J. S. Kim and B. C. Sanders. Generalized W-class state and its monogamy relation. J. Phys. A
2008
Cited alongside, same era.
J. S. Kim and B. C. Sanders. Generalized W-class state and its monogamy relation. J. Phys. A
2008
Cited alongside, same era.
R. Horodecki, P. Horodecki, M. Horodecki, and K. Horodecki, Quantum entanglement. Rev. Mod. Phys
S. Lloyd and J. Preskill. Unitarity of black hole evaporation in final-state projection models. J. High Energy Phys
2014
Later among the works it cites.
X. N. Zhu and S. M. Fei, Phys. Rev. A 90
2014
Later among the works it cites.
Y.-K. Bai, Y.-F. Xu, and Z. D. Wang. General monogamy relation for the entanglement of formation in multiqubit systems. Phys. Rev. Lett
2014
Later among the works it cites.
T. R. de Oliveira, M. F. Cornelio, and F. F. Fanchini. Monogamy of entanglement of formation. Phys. Rev. A
2014
Later among the works it cites.
J. H. Choi and J. S. Kim. Negativity and strong monogamy of multiparty quantum entanglement beyond qubits. Phys. Rev. A
2015
Later among the works it cites.
Y. Luo and Y. Li. Monogamy of α \alpha th power entanglement measurement in qubit systems. Ann. Phys
alphaXiv searches the wider corpus for related work and actual follow-ups.
alphaXiv is searching for related work…
2009
Cited alongside, same era.
J. S. Kim, A. Das, and B. C. Sanders. Entanglement monogamy of multipartite higher-dimensional quantum systems using convex-roof extended negativity. Phys. Rev. A
2009
Cited alongside, same era.
J. S. Kim, A. Das, and B. C. Sanders. Entanglement monogamy of multipartite higher-dimensional quantum systems using convex-roof extended negativity. Phys. Rev. A
2009
Cited alongside, same era.
J. S. Kim and B. C. Sanders. Monogamy of multi-qubit entanglement using Rényi entropy. J. Phys. A
2010
Cited alongside, same era.
X.-J. Ren and W. Jiang. Entanglement monogamy inequality in a 2 ⊗ 2 ⊗ 4 2\otimes 2\otimes 4 system. Phys. Rev. A
2010
Cited alongside, same era.
M. F. Cornelio and M. C. de Oliveira. Strong superadditivity and monogamy of the Rényi measure of entanglement. Phys. Rev. A
2010
Cited alongside, same era.
M. Pawlowski. Security proof for cryptographic protocols based only on the monogamy of Bell’s inequality violations. Phys. Rev. A
2010
Cited alongside, same era.
2015
Later among the works it cites.
X. N. Zhu and S. M. Fei. Entanglement monogamy relations of concurrence for N N -qubit systems. Phys. Rev. A
2015
Later among the works it cites.
H. He and G. Vidal. Disentangling theorem and monogamy for entanglement negativity. Phys. Rev. A
2015
Later among the works it cites.
C. Eltschka and J. Siewert. Monogamy equalities for qubit entanglement from Lorentz invariance. Phys. Rev. Lett
2015
Later among the works it cites.
A. Kumar, R. Prabhu, A. Sen(de), and U. Sen. Effect of a large number of parties on the monogamy of quantum correlations. Phys. Rev. A
2015
Later among the works it cites.
H. He and G. Vidal. Disentangling theorem and monogamy for entanglement negativity. Phys. Rev. A
2015
Later among the works it cites.
C. Eltschka and J. Siewert. Monogamy equalities for qubit entanglement from Lorentz invariance. Phys. Rev. Lett
2015
Later among the works it cites.
K. M. R. Audenaert. On a block matrix inequality quantifying the monogamy of the negativity of entanglement. Lin. Multilin. Alg
2015
Later among the works it cites.
Y. Luo and Y. Li. Monogamy of α \alpha th power entanglement measurement in qubit systems. Ann. Phys
2015
Later among the works it cites.
J. H. Choi and J. S. Kim. Negativity and strong monogamy of multiparty quantum entanglement beyond qubits. Phys. Rev. A
2015
Later among the works it cites.
A. Kumar. Conditions for monogamy of quantum correlations in multipartite systems. Phys. Lett. A
2016
Later among the works it cites.
Lancien et al . Should entanglement measures be monogamous or faithful? Phys. Rev. Lett
2016
Later among the works it cites.
L. Lami, C. Hirche, G. Adesso, and A. Winter. Schur complement inequalities for covariance matrices and monogamy of quantum correlations. Phys. Rev. Lett
2016
Later among the works it cites.
Song et al . General monogamy relation of multiqubit systems in terms of squared Rényi- α \alpha entanglement. Phys. Rev. A
2016
Later among the works it cites.
B. Regula, A. Osterloh, and G. Adesso. Strong monogamy inequalities for four qubits. Phys. Rev. A
2016
Later among the works it cites.
Y. Luo, T. Tian, L.-H. Shao, and Y. Li. General monogamy of Tsallis q q -entropy entanglement in multiqubit systems. Phys. Rev. A
2016
Later among the works it cites.
E. Jung and D. Park. Testing the monogamy relations via rank-2 mixtures. Phys. Rev. A
2016
Later among the works it cites.
Lancien et al . Should entanglement measures be monogamous or faithful? Phys. Rev. Lett
2016
Later among the works it cites.
A. Kumar. Conditions for monogamy of quantum correlations in multipartite systems. Phys. Lett. A
2016
Later among the works it cites.
J. S. Kim. Tsallis entropy and general polygamy of multiparty quantum entanglement in arbitrary dimensions. Phys. Rev. A
2016
Later among the works it cites.
Y. Luo, T. Tian, L.-H. Shao, and Y. Li. General monogamy of Tsallis q q -entropy entanglement in multiqubit systems. Phys. Rev. A
2016
Later among the works it cites.
Song et al . General monogamy relation of multiqubit systems in terms of squared Rényi- α \alpha entanglement. Phys. Rev. A
2016
Later among the works it cites.
S. Cheng and M. J. W. Hall. Anisotropic invariance and the distribution of quantum correlations. Phys. Rev. Lett
2017
Closest in time.
G. W. Allen and D. A. Meyer. Polynomial monogamy relations for entanglement negativity. Phys. Rev. Lett
2017
Closest in time.
Q. Li, J. Cui, S. Wang, and G.-L. Long. Entanglement monogamy in three qutrit systems. Sci. Rep
2017
Closest in time.
S. Camalet. Monogamy Inequality for any local quantum resource and entanglement. Phys. Rev. Lett
2017
Closest in time.
S. Cheng and M. J. W. Hall. Anisotropic invariance and the distribution of quantum correlations. Phys. Rev. Lett
2017
Closest in time.
G. W. Allen and D. A. Meyer. Polynomial monogamy relations for entanglement negativity. Phys. Rev. Lett
2017
Closest in time.