Fetching the paper…
Reading the bibliography…
We present a new veto procedure to distinguish between continuous gravitational wave (CW) signals and the detector artifacts that can mimic their behavior.
P. Jaranowski, A. Królak, and B. F. Schutz, “Data analysis of gravitational-wave signals from spinning neutron stars: The signal and its detection,” Phys. Rev. D 58
1998
Earlier work this paper cites.
C. Cutler and B. F. Schutz, “Generalized ℱ \mathcal{F} -statistic: Multiple detectors and multiple gravitational wave pulsars,” Phys. Rev. D 72
2005
Earlier work this paper cites.
D. Keitel et al. , “Search for continuous gravitational waves: Improving robustness versus instrument artifacts,” Phys. Rev. D 89
2014
Earlier work this paper cites.
D. Keitel, “Robust semicoherent searches for continuous gravitational waves with noise and signal models including hours to days long transients,” Phys. Rev. D 93
2016
Cited alongside, same era.
A. Singh et al. , “Results from an all-sky high-frequency Einstein@Home search for continuous gravitational waves in the LIGO 5th Science Run,” Phys. Rev. D 94
2016
Cited alongside, same era.
B. P. Abbott et al. , “Results of the deepest all-sky survey for continuous gravitational waves on LIGO S6 data running on the Einstein@Home volunteer distributed computing project,” Phys. Rev. D 94
2016
Cited alongside, same era.
https://www.aei.mpg.de/24838/02_Computing_and_ATLAS
Cited in the paper.
M. A. Papa et al. , “Hierarchical follow-up of sub-threshold candidates of an all-sky Einstein@home search for continuous gravitational waves on LIGO data,” Phys. Rev. D 94
2016
Later among the works it cites.
2017
Closest in time.
2017
Closest in time.
alphaXiv searches the wider corpus for related work and actual follow-ups.
alphaXiv is searching for related work…