Fetching the paper…
Reading the bibliography…
Finding quantitative aspects of quantum phenomena which cannot be explained by any classical model has foundational importance for understanding the boundary between classical and quantum theory.
J. S. Bell, “On the Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen paradox,” Physics
1964
Earlier work this paper cites.
J. S. Bell, “On the problem of hidden variables in quantum mechanics,” Rev. Mod. Phys
1966
Earlier work this paper cites.
S. Kochen and E. Specker, “The problem of hidden variables in quantum mechanics,” vol. 17, p. 59, 1967
1967
Earlier work this paper cites.
C. W. Helstrom, “Quantum detection and estimation theory,” Journal of Statistical Physics
1969
Earlier work this paper cites.
J. F. Clauser, M. A. Horne, A. Shimony, and R. A. Holt, “Proposed experiment to test local hidden-variable theories,” Phys. Rev. Lett
1969
Earlier work this paper cites.
C. H. Bennett, “Quantum cryptography using any two nonorthogonal states,” Phys. Rev. Lett
1992
Earlier work this paper cites.
D. Mayers, “Unconditionally secure quantum bit commitment is impossible,” Phys. Rev. Lett
1997
Earlier work this paper cites.
H.-K. Lo and H. F. Chau, “Is quantum bit commitment really possible?,” Phys. Rev. Lett
1997
Earlier work this paper cites.
R. W. Spekkens and T. Rudolph, “Degrees of concealment and bindingness in quantum bit commitment protocols,” Phys. Rev. A
2001
Earlier work this paper cites.
Special Issue on STOC 2001
A. Ambainis, “A new protocol and lower bounds for quantum coin flipping,” Journal of Computer and System Sciences · 2001
Earlier work this paper cites.
L. Hardy, “Quantum Theory From Five Reasonable Axioms,” eprint arXiv:quant-ph/0101012
2001
Earlier work this paper cites.
R. W. Spekkens, “Contextuality for preparations, transformations, and unsharp measurements,” Phys. Rev. A
2005
Earlier work this paper cites.
J. Barrett, L. Hardy, and A. Kent, “No signaling and quantum key distribution,” Phys. Rev. Lett
2005
Earlier work this paper cites.
M. S. Leifer and R. W. Spekkens, “Pre- and post-selection paradoxes and contextuality in quantum mechanics,” Phys. Rev. Lett
2005
Earlier work this paper cites.
R. W. Spekkens, “Evidence for the epistemic view of quantum states: A toy theory,” Phys. Rev. A
2007
Earlier work this paper cites.
J. Barrett, “Information processing in generalized probabilistic theories,” Phys. Rev. A
2007
Cited alongside, same era.
R. W. Spekkens, “Negativity and contextuality are equivalent notions of nonclassicality,” Phys. Rev. Lett
2008
Cited alongside, same era.
M. Navascues, S. Pironio, and A. Acin, “A convergent hierarchy of semidefinite programs characterizing the set of quantum correlations,” New Journal of Physics
2008
Cited alongside, same era.
R. W. Spekkens, D. H. Buzacott, A. J. Keehn, B. Toner, and G. J. Pryde, “Preparation contextuality powers parity-oblivious multiplexing,” Phys. Rev. Lett
2009
Cited alongside, same era.
H. Buhrman, R. Cleve, S. Massar, and R. de Wolf, “Nonlocality and communication complexity,” Rev. Mod. Phys
2010
Cited alongside, same era.
J. Barrett, E. G. Cavalcanti, R. Lal, and O. J. E. Maroney, “No ψ \psi -epistemic model can fully explain the indistinguishability of quantum states,” Phys. Rev. Lett
2014
Later among the works it cites.
R. Chaves, L. Luft, and D. Gross, “Causal structures from entropic information: geometry and novel scenarios,” New Journal of Physics
2014
Later among the works it cites.
2015
Later among the works it cites.
M. F. Pusey and M. S. Leifer, “Logical pre- and post-selection paradoxes are proofs of contextuality,” vol. 195, pp. 295–306, 2015
2015
Later among the works it cites.
Krishna, Anirudh, “Experimentally testable noncontextuality inequalities via fourier-motzkin elimination,” Master’s thesis, 2015
2015
alphaXiv searches the wider corpus for related work and actual follow-ups.
alphaXiv is searching for related work…
N. Harrigan and R. W. Spekkens, “Einstein, incompleteness, and the epistemic view of quantum states,” Foundations of Physics
2010
Cited alongside, same era.
T. S. Cubitt, D. Leung, W. Matthews, and A. Winter, “Improving zero-error classical communication with entanglement,” Phys. Rev. Lett
2010
Cited alongside, same era.
M. J. Hoban, E. T. Campbell, K. Loukopoulos, and D. E. Browne, “Non-adaptive measurement-based quantum computation and multi-party Bell inequalities,” New Journal of Physics
2011
Cited alongside, same era.
Y.-C. Liang, R. W. Spekkens, and H. M. Wiseman, “Specker’s parable of the overprotective seer: A road to contextuality, nonlocality and complementarity,” Physics Reports
2011
Cited alongside, same era.
O. J. E. Maroney, “How statistical are quantum states?,” in arXiv:1207.6906
2012
Cited alongside, same era.
C. Budroni and A. Cabello, “Bell inequalities from variable-elimination methods,” Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and Theoretical
2012
Cited alongside, same era.
R. Raussendorf, “Contextuality in measurement-based quantum computation,” Phys. Rev. A
2013
Cited alongside, same era.
Later among the works it cites.
2015
Later among the works it cites.
A. Chailloux, I. Kerenidis, S. Kundu, and J. Sikora, “Optimal bounds for parity-oblivious random access codes,” New Journal of Physics
2016
Later among the works it cites.
2016
Later among the works it cites.
Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands, 2016
R. W. Spekkens, Quasi-Quantization: Classical Statistical Theories with an Epistemic Restriction · 2016
Later among the works it cites.
M. D. Mazurek, M. F. Pusey, R. Kunjwal, K. J. Resch, and R. W. Spekkens, “An experimental test of noncontextuality without unphysical idealizations,” Nature Communications
2016
Later among the works it cites.
R. Chaves, “Polynomial bell inequalities,” Phys. Rev. Lett
2016
Later among the works it cites.
2016
Later among the works it cites.
2017
Closest in time.
2017
Closest in time.