Cosmological discordances: a new measure, marginalization effects, and application to geometry vs growth current data sets

H. Akaike, “A new look at the statistical model identification,” IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control 19

1974

Earlier work this paper cites.

H. Jeffreys, The Theory of Probability , Oxford Classic Texts in the Physical Sciences (OUP Oxford, 1998)

1998

Earlier work this paper cites.

A. Lewis and S. Bridle, “Cosmological parameters from CMB and other data: A Monte Carlo approach,” Phys. Rev. D 66

2002

Earlier work this paper cites.

David J. Spiegelhalter, Nicola G. Best, Bradley P. Carlin, and Angelika Van Der Linde, “Bayesian measures of model complexity and fit,” Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series B (Statistical Methodology) 64

2002

Earlier work this paper cites.

M. Ishak, A. Upadhye, and D. N. Spergel, “Probing cosmic acceleration beyond the equation of state: Distinguishing between dark energy and modified gravity models,” Phys. Rev. D 74

2006

Earlier work this paper cites.

K. Koyama, “Structure formation in modified gravity models,” J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 3

2006

Earlier work this paper cites.

E. Bertschinger, “On the Growth of Perturbations as a Test of Dark Energy and Gravity,” Astrophys. J. 648

2006

Earlier work this paper cites.

P. Marshall, N. Rajguru, and A. Slosar, “Bayesian evidence as a tool for comparing datasets,” Phys. Rev. D 73

2006

Earlier work this paper cites.

M. Ishak, “Remarks on the Formulation of the Cosmological Constant/Dark Energy Problems,” Foundations of Physics 37

2007

Earlier work this paper cites.

S. Wang, L. Hui, M. May, and Z. Haiman, “Is modified gravity required by observations? An empirical consistency test of dark energy models,” Phys. Rev. D 76

Original

2007

Earlier work this paper cites.

A. R. Liddle, “Information criteria for astrophysical model selection,” Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 377

2007

Earlier work this paper cites.

C. G. Tsagas, A. Challinor, and R. Maartens, “Relativistic cosmology and large-scale structure,” Phys. Rep. 465

Original

2008

Earlier work this paper cites.

E. Calabrese, A. Slosar, A. Melchiorri, G. F. Smoot, and O. Zahn, “Cosmic microwave weak lensing data as a test for the dark universe,” Phys. Rev. D 77

Original

2008

Earlier work this paper cites.

A. Vikhlinin et al. , “Chandra Cluster Cosmology Project III: Cosmological Parameter Constraints,” Astrophys. J. 692

Original

2009

Earlier work this paper cites.

C. Shapiro, “Biased Dark Energy Constraints from Neglecting Reduced Shear in Weak-Lensing Surveys,” Astrophys. J. 696

Original

2009

Earlier work this paper cites.

Chris Blake et al. , “The WiggleZ Dark Energy Survey: the selection function and z = 0.6 galaxy power spectrum,” Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 406

Original

2010

Earlier work this paper cites.

M. J. Mortonson, D. Huterer, and W. Hu, “Figures of merit for present and future dark energy probes,” Phys. Rev. D 82

Original

2010

Earlier work this paper cites.

F. Beutler, C. Blake, M. Colless, D. H. Jones, L. Staveley-Smith, L. Campbell, Q. Parker, W. Saunders, and F. Watson, “The 6dF Galaxy Survey: baryon acoustic oscillations and the local Hubble constant,” Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 416

Original

2011

Earlier work this paper cites.

A. G. Riess, L. Macri, S. Casertano, H. Lampeitl, H. C. Ferguson, A. V. Filippenko, S. W. Jha, W. Li, and R. Chornock, “A 3% Solution: Determination of the Hubble Constant with the Hubble Space Telescope and Wide Field Camera 3,” Astrophys. J. 730

Original

2011

Earlier work this paper cites.

C. Blake et al. , “The WiggleZ Dark Energy Survey: the growth rate of cosmic structure since redshift z=0.9,” Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 415

Original

2011

Earlier work this paper cites.

M. C. March, R. Trotta, L. Amendola, and D. Huterer, “Robustness to systematics for future dark energy probes,” Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 415

Original

2011

Earlier work this paper cites.

T. Clifton, P. G. Ferreira, A. Padilla, and C. Skordis, “Modified gravity and cosmology,” Phys. Rep. 513

Original

2012

Earlier work this paper cites.

A. Shafieloo, “Crossing statistic: Bayesian interpretation, model selection and resolving dark energy parametrization problem,” J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 5

Original

2012

Cited alongside, same era.

David Parkinson, Signe Riemer-Sorensen, Chris Blake, Gregory B. Poole, Tamara M. Davis, et al. , “The WiggleZ Dark Energy Survey: Final data release and cosmological results,” Phys. Rev. D 86

Original

2012

Cited alongside, same era.

C. Heymans et al. , “CFHTLenS tomographic weak lensing cosmological parameter constraints: Mitigating the impact of intrinsic galaxy alignments,” Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 432

Original

2013

Cited alongside, same era.

L. Verde, P. Protopapas, and R. Jimenez, “Planck and the local Universe: Quantifying the tension,” Physics of the Dark Universe 2

Original

2013

Cited alongside, same era.

A. J. Ross, L. Samushia, C. Howlett, W. J. Percival, A. Burden, and M. Manera, “The clustering of the SDSS DR7 main Galaxy sample - I. A 4 per cent distance measure at z = 0.15,” Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 449

Original

2015

Later among the works it cites.

K. Koyama, “Cosmological tests of modified gravity,” Reports on Progress in Physics 79

Original

2016

Later among the works it cites.

A. Joyce, L. Lombriser, and F. Schmidt, “Dark Energy Versus Modified Gravity,” Annual Review of Nuclear and Particle Science 66

Original

2016

Later among the works it cites.

P. Bull et al. , “Beyond Λ \Lambda CDM: Problems, solutions, and the road ahead,” Physics of the Dark Universe 12

Original

2016

Later among the works it cites.

I. Debono and G. F. Smoot, “General Relativity and Cosmology: Unsolved Questions and Future Directions,” Universe 2