Fetching the paper…

Reading the bibliography…

2017

Criticality in Third Order Lovelock Gravity and the Butterfly effect

Qaemmaqami, Mohammad M.

Original
PDF
Post on X

Understand

We study third order Lovelock Gravity in $ D=7 $ at the critical point which three (A)dS vacua degenerate into one.

We see there is not propagating graviton at the critical point.
And also we compute the butterfly velocity for this theory at the critical point by considering the shock wave solutions near horizon, this is important to note that although there is no propagating graviton at the critical point, due to boundary gravitons the butterfly velocity is non-zero.
Finally we observe that the butterfly velocity for third order Lovelock Gravity at the critical point in $ D=7 $ is less than the butterfly velocity for Einstein-Gauss-Bonnet Gravity at the critical point in $ D=7 $ which is less than the butterfly velocity in D = 7 for Einstein Gravity, $ v_{B}^{E.H}>v_{B}^{E.G.B}>v_{B}^{3rd\,\,Lovelock} $.

Criticality in Third Order Lovelock Gravity and the Butterfly effect · Around

Built on

H. Lu and C. N. Pope, Phys. Rev. Lett. 106
Original
1971
Earlier work this paper cites.
D. Lovelock, J. Math. Phys. 12
1971
Earlier work this paper cites.
K. S. Stelle, Phys. Rev. D 16
1977
Earlier work this paper cites.
K. S. Stelle, Gen. Rel. Grav. 9
1978
Earlier work this paper cites.
J. Crisostomo, R. Troncoso and J. Zanelli, Phys. Rev. D 62
2000
Earlier work this paper cites.
M. Banados, R. Olea and S. Theisen, JHEP 0510
2005
Earlier work this paper cites.
D. Grumiller and N. Johansson, JHEP 0807
Original
2008
Earlier work this paper cites.
S. H. Hendi and M. H. Dehghani, Phys. Lett. B 666
Original
2008
Earlier work this paper cites.
M. H. Dehghani and R. Pourhasan, Phys. Rev. D 79
Original
2009
Earlier work this paper cites.

Similar

S. Deser, H. Liu, H. Lu, C. N. Pope, T. C. Sisman and B. Tekin, Phys. Rev. D 83
Original
2011
Cited alongside, same era.
E. A. Bergshoeff, O. Hohm, J. Rosseel and P. K. Townsend, Phys. Rev. D 83
Original
2011
Cited alongside, same era.
M. Alishahiha and R. Fareghbal, Phys. Rev. D 83
Original
2011
Cited alongside, same era.
J. de Boer, M. Kulaxizi and A. Parnachev, JHEP 1107
Original
2011
Cited alongside, same era.
N. Johansson, A. Naseh and T. Zojer, JHEP 1209
Original
2012
Cited alongside, same era.

Then

S. H. Shenker and D. Stanford, JHEP 1412
Original
2014
Later among the works it cites.
S. Leichenauer, Phys. Rev. D 90
Original
2014
Later among the works it cites.
D. A. Roberts, D. Stanford and L. Susskind, JHEP 1503
Original
2015
Later among the works it cites.
M. Alishahiha, M. M. Qaemmaqami, A. Naseh and A. Shirzad, JHEP 1601
Original
2016
Later among the works it cites.
Z. Y. Fan, B. Chen and H. Lu, Eur. Phys. J. C 76
Original
2016
Later among the works it cites.

Beyond the bibliography

alphaXiv searches the wider corpus for related work and actual follow-ups.

Open on alphaXiv

alphaXiv is searching for related work…

D. C. Zou, S. J. Zhang and B. Wang, Phys. Rev. D 87

2013

Cited alongside, same era.

M. Alishahiha, M. M. Qaemmaqami, A. Naseh and A. Shirzad, JHEP 1412

2014

Cited alongside, same era.

H. Xu, W. Xu and L. Zhao, Eur. Phys. J. C 74

2014

Cited alongside, same era.

S. H. Shenker and D. Stanford, JHEP 1403

2014

Cited alongside, same era.

R. A. Konoplya and A. Zhidenko, arXiv:1705.01656 [hep-th]

Cited in the paper.

M. Baggioli and W. J. Li, arXiv:1705.01766 [hep-th]

Cited in the paper.

R. G. Cai, X. X. Zeng and H. Q. Zhang, arXiv:1704.03989 [hep-th]

Cited in the paper.

M. Alishahiha, A. Davody, A. Naseh and S. F. Taghavi, JHEP 1611

2016

Later among the works it cites.

M. Blake, Phys. Rev. Lett. 117

2016

Later among the works it cites.

X. H. Feng and H. Lu, Phys. Rev. D 95

2017

Closest in time.

Y. Ling, P. Liu and J. P. Wu, Phys. Lett. B 768

2017

Closest in time.