Fetching the paper…
Reading the bibliography…
In an effort to overcome the limitations of random spin-glass benchmarks for quantum annealers, focus has shifted to carefully-crafted gadget-based problems whose logical structure has typically a planar topology.
S. Kirkpatrick, C. D. Gelatt, Jr., and M. P. Vecchi, Optimization by simulated annealing , Science 220
1983
Earlier work this paper cites.
T. Kadowaki and H. Nishimori, Quantum annealing in the transverse Ising model , Phys. Rev. E 58
1998
Earlier work this paper cites.
E. Farhi, J. Goldstone, S. Gutmann, and M. Sipser, Quantum Computation by Adiabatic Evolution (2000), arXiv:quant-ph/0001106
2000
Earlier work this paper cites.
A. K. Hartmann and H. Rieger, Optimization Algorithms in Physics (Wiley-VCH, Berlin, 2001)
2001
Earlier work this paper cites.
F. Hamze and N. de Freitas, in Proceedings of the 20th Conference on Uncertainty in Artificial Intelligence (AUAI Press, Arlington, Virginia, United States, 2004), UAI ’04, p. 243, ISBN 0-9749039-0-6
2004
Earlier work this paper cites.
A. K. Hartmann and H. Rieger, New Optimization Algorithms in Physics (Wiley-VCH, Berlin, 2004)
2004
Earlier work this paper cites.
V. Kolmogorov, Blossom V: A new implementation of a minimum cost perfect matching algorithm , Math. Prog. Comp. 1
2009
Earlier work this paper cites.
T. F. Rønnow, Z. Wang, J. Job, S. Boixo, S. V. Isakov, D. Wecker, J. M. Martinis, D. A. Lidar, and M. Troyer, Defining and detecting quantum speedup , Science 345
2014
Earlier work this paper cites.
S. Boixo, T. F. Rønnow, S. V. Isakov, Z. Wang, D. Wecker, D. A. Lidar, J. M. Martinis, and M. Troyer, Evidence for quantum annealing with more than one hundred qubits , Nat. Phys. 10
2014
Cited alongside, same era.
H. G. Katzgraber, F. Hamze, and R. S. Andrist, Glassy Chimeras Could Be Blind to Quantum Speedup: Designing Better Benchmarks for Quantum Annealing Machines , Phys. Rev. X 4
2014
Cited alongside, same era.
P. Bunyk, E. Hoskinson, M. W. Johnson, E. Tolkacheva, F. Altomare, A. J. Berkley, R. Harris, J. P. Hilton, T. Lanting, and J. Whittaker, Architectural Considerations in the Design of a Superconducting Quantum Annealing Processor , IEEE Trans. Appl. Supercond. 24
2014
Cited alongside, same era.
A. Selby, Efficient subgraph-based sampling of Ising-type models with frustration (2014), (arXiv:cond-mat/1409.3934)
2014
Cited alongside, same era.
Z. Zhu, A. J. Ochoa, and H. G. Katzgraber, Efficient Cluster Algorithm for Spin Glasses in Any Space Dimension , Phys. Rev. Lett. 115
2015
Later among the works it cites.
2015
Later among the works it cites.
V. S. Denchev, S. Boixo, S. V. Isakov, N. Ding, R. Babbush, V. Smelyanskiy, J. Martinis, and H. Neven, What is the Computational Value of Finite Range Tunneling? , Phys. Rev. X 6
2016
Later among the works it cites.
S. Mandrà, Z. Zhu, W. Wang, A. Perdomo-Ortiz, and H. G. Katzgraber, Strengths and weaknesses of weak-strong cluster problems: A detailed overview of state-of-the-art classical heuristics versus quantum approaches , Phys. Rev. A 94
2016
Later among the works it cites.
alphaXiv searches the wider corpus for related work and actual follow-ups.
alphaXiv is searching for related work…
H. G. Katzgraber, F. Hamze, Z. Zhu, A. J. Ochoa, and H. Munoz-Bauza, Seeking Quantum Speedup Through Spin Glasses: The Good, the Bad, and the Ugly , Phys. Rev. X 5
2015
Cited alongside, same era.
D. Venturelli, S. Mandrà, S. Knysh, B. O’Gorman, R. Biswas, and V. Smelyanskiy, Quantum Optimization of Fully Connected Spin Glasses , Phys. Rev. X 5
2015
Cited alongside, same era.
I. Hen, J. Job, T. Albash, T. F. Rønnow, M. Troyer, and D. A. Lidar, Probing for quantum speedup in spin-glass problems with planted solutions , Phys. Rev. A 92
2015
Cited alongside, same era.
J. Marshall, V. Martin-Mayor, and I. Hen, Practical engineering of hard spin-glass instances , Phys. Rev. A 94
2016
Later among the works it cites.
J. King, S. Yarkoni, J. Raymond, I. Ozfidan, A. D. King, M. M. Nevisi, J. P. Hilton, and C. C. McGeoch, Quantum Annealing amid Local Ruggedness and Global Frustration (2017), (arXiv:quant-phys/1701.04579)
2017
Closest in time.
R. Harris et al
2017
Closest in time.