Fetching the paper…
Reading the bibliography…
Recidivism prediction instruments (RPI's) provide decision makers with an assessment of the likelihood that a criminal defendant will reoffend at a future point in time.
Clinical versus statistical prediction: A theoretical analysis and a review of the evidence
Paul E Meehl · 1954
Earlier work this paper cites.
Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences (2nd Edition)
Jacob Cohen · 1988
Earlier work this paper cites.
The influence of race on sentencing: A meta-analytic review of experimental studies
Laura T Sweeney and Craig Haney · 1992
Earlier work this paper cites.
Clinical versus mechanical prediction: a meta-analysis
William M Grove, David H Zald, Boyd S Lebow, Beth E Snitz, and Chad Nelson · 2000
Earlier work this paper cites.
Validation of the compas risk assessment classification instrument
Thomas Blomberg, William Bales, Karen Mann, Ryan Meldrum, and Joe Nedelec · 2010
Earlier work this paper cites.
Three naive bayes approaches for discrimination-free classification
Toon Calders and Sicco Verwer · 2010
Earlier work this paper cites.
An overview of the federal post conviction risk assessment, September 2011
Administrative Office of the United States Courts · 2011
Earlier work this paper cites.
Fairness through awareness
Cynthia Dwork, Moritz Hardt, Toniann Pitassi, Omer Reingold, and Richard Zemel · 2012
Earlier work this paper cites.
Testing for racial prejudice in the parole board release process: Theory and evidence
Shamena Anwar and Hanming Fang · 2012
Earlier work this paper cites.
Predictive validity performance indicators in violence risk assessment: A methodological primer
Jay P Singh · 2013
Cited alongside, same era.
Actuarial sentencing: An ?unsettled? proposition
Kelly Hannah-Moffat · 2013
Cited alongside, same era.
Risk technology in sentencing: Testing the promises and perils (commentary on hannah-moffat, 2011)
Jennifer Skeem · 2013
Cited alongside, same era.
Predicting recidivism risk: New tool in philadelphia shows great promise
Nancy Ritter · 2013
Cited alongside, same era.
Validation of risk scale
PCS · 2013
Cited alongside, same era.
A multidisciplinary survey on discrimination analysis
Andrea Romei and Salvatore Ruggieri · 2014
Cited alongside, same era.
False positives, false negatives, and false analyses: A rejoinder to “machine bias: There’s software used across the country to predict future criminals. and it’s biased against blacks.”
Anthony W Flores, Kristin Bechtel, and Christopher T Lowenkamp · 2016
Later among the works it cites.
Compas risk scales: Demonstrating accuracy equity and predictive parity
William Dieterich, Christina Mendoza, and Tim Brennan · 2016
Later among the works it cites.
Gender, risk assessment, and sanctioning: The cost of treating women like men
Jennifer L Skeem, John Monahan, and Christopher T Lowenkamp · 2016
Later among the works it cites.
Equality of opportunity in supervised learning
Moritz Hardt, Eric Price, Nati Srebro, et al · 2016
Later among the works it cites.
A confidence-based approach for balancing fairness and accuracy
Benjamin Fish, Jeremy Kun, and Ádám D Lelkes · 2016
Later among the works it cites.
alphaXiv searches the wider corpus for related work and actual follow-ups.
alphaXiv is searching for related work…
Risk, race, & recidivism: Predictive bias and disparate impact
Jennifer L Skeem and Christopher T Lowenkamp · 2015
Cited alongside, same era.
On the relation between accuracy and fairness in binary classification
Indre Zliobaite · 2015
Cited alongside, same era.
American Law Institute, 2016
Model penal code: Sentencing · 2016
Cited alongside, same era.
Should prison sentences be based on crimes that haven’t been committed yet?
Ben Casselman Anna Maria Barry-Jester and Dana Goldstein
Cited in the paper.
Machine bias: There’s software used across the country to predict future criminals. and it’s biased against blacks
Julia Angwin, Jeff Larson, Surya Mattu, and Lauren Kirchner
Cited in the paper.
Compas risk & need assessment system: Selected questions posed by inquiring agencies
Northpointe
Cited in the paper.
Solon Barocas and Andrew D Selbst · 2016
Later among the works it cites.
Risk assessment in criminal sentencing
John Monahan and Jennifer L Skeem · 2016
Later among the works it cites.
Inherent trade-offs in the fair determination of risk scores
Jon Kleinberg, Sendhil Mullainathan, and Manish Raghavan · 2016
Later among the works it cites.
U.S. Department of Justice, 2016
Uniform crime report: Crime in the united states, 2015 - offenses cleared · 2016
Later among the works it cites.