Fetching the paper…

Reading the bibliography…

Evidence of Two Resonant Structures in $e^+ e^- \to \pi^+ \pi^- h_c$ · Around

2016

Evidence of Two Resonant Structures in $e^+ e^- \to \pi^+ \pi^- h_c$

Ablikim, M., Achasov, M. N., Ahmed, S. et al.

Original
PDF
Post on X

Understand

The cross sections of $e^{+}e^{-}\to\pi^{+}\pi^{-}h_c$ at center-of-mass energies from 3.896 to 4.600 GeV are measured using data samples collected with the BESIII detector operating at the Beijing Electron Positron Collider.

The cross sections are found to be of the same order of magnitude as those of $e^{+}e^{-}\to\pi^{+}\pi^{-}J/\psi$ and $e^{+}e^{-}\to\pi^{+}\pi^{-}\psi(2S)$, but the line shape is inconsistent with the $Y$ states observed in the latter two modes.
Two structures are observed in the $e^{+}e^{-}\to\pi^{+}\pi^{-}h_c$ cross sections around 4.22 and 4.39 GeV/$c^{2}$, which we call $Y(4220)$ and $Y(4390)$, respectively.
A fit with a coherent sum of two Breit-Wigner functions results in a mass of $(4218.4^{+5.5}_{-4.5}\pm0.9)$ MeV/$c^{2}$ and a width of $(66.0^{+12.3}_{-8.3}\pm0.4)$ MeV for the $Y(4220)$, and a mass of $(4391.6^{+6.3}_{-6.8}\pm1.0)$ MeV/$c^{2}$ and a width of $(139.5^{+16.2}_{-20.6}\pm0.6)$ MeV for the $Y(4390)$, where the first uncertainties are statistical and the second ones systematic.

Built on

E. A. Kuraev and V. S. Fadin, Sov. J. Nucl. Phys. 41
1985
Earlier work this paper cites.
S. Jadach, B. F. L. Ward and Z. Was, Comp. Phys. Commu. 130
2001
Earlier work this paper cites.
S. Agostinelli et al
2003
Earlier work this paper cites.
B. Aubert et al
2005
Earlier work this paper cites.
T. E. Coan et al
2006
Earlier work this paper cites.
T. W. Chiu and T. H. Hsieh (TWQCD Collaboration), Phys. Rev. D 73
2006
Earlier work this paper cites.
C. Z. Yuan et al
2007
Earlier work this paper cites.
B. Aubert et al
2007
Earlier work this paper cites.
X. L. Wang et al
2007
Earlier work this paper cites.
T. Barnes, F. E. Close, and E. S. Swanson, Phys. Rev. D 52
2008
Earlier work this paper cites.
M. Ablikim et al
2010
Earlier work this paper cites.
S. Actis et al
2010
Earlier work this paper cites.

Similar

For a recent review, see N. Brambilla et al
2011
Cited alongside, same era.
T. K. Pedlar et al
2011
Cited alongside, same era.
K. Zhu, X. H. Mo, C. Z. Yuan and P. Wang, Int. J. Mod. Phys. A 26
2011
Cited alongside, same era.
E. V. Abakumova et al
2011
Cited alongside, same era.
J. P. Lees et al
2012
Cited alongside, same era.
M. Ablikim et al
2012
Cited alongside, same era.
L. Liu et al
2012
Cited alongside, same era.
Z. Q. Liu et al
2013

Then

J. P. Lees et al
2014
Later among the works it cites.
C. Z. Yuan, Chin. Phys. C 38(4)
2014
Later among the works it cites.
M. Ablikim et al
2014
Later among the works it cites.
M. Cleven, Q. Wang, F. K. Guo, C. Hanhart, U. G. Meißner, and Q. Zhao, Phys. Rev. D 90
2014
Later among the works it cites.
X. L. Wang et al
2015
Later among the works it cites.
M. Ablikim et al
2015
Later among the works it cites.
M. Ablikim et al
2015
Later among the works it cites.
R. A. Briceno et al

Beyond the bibliography

alphaXiv searches the wider corpus for related work and actual follow-ups.

Open on alphaXiv

alphaXiv is searching for related work…

Cited alongside, same era.

M. Ablikim et al

2013

Cited alongside, same era.

M. Ablikim et al

2013

Cited alongside, same era.

M. Ablikim et al

2013

Cited alongside, same era.

T. Xiao, S. Dobbs, A. Tomaradze and K. K. Seth, Phys. Lett. B 727

2013

Cited alongside, same era.

2016

Closest in time.

K. A. Olive et al

2016

Closest in time.

H. X. Chen, W. Chen, X. Liu, and S. L. Zhu, Phys. Rep. 639

2016

Closest in time.

M. Ablikim et al

2016

Closest in time.

Y. Chen, W. F. Chiu, M. Gong, L. C. Gui, and Z. F. Liu, Chin. Phys. C 40(8)

2016

Closest in time.