Built on

P. Agarwal, I. Bah, K. Maruyoshi, and J. Song, “Quiver tails and 𝒩 = 1 \mathcal{N}=1 SCFTs from M5-branes,” JHEP
Original
1908
Earlier work this paper cites.
A. D. Shapere and Y. Tachikawa, “Central charges of 𝒩 = 2 \mathcal{N}=2 superconformal field theories in four dimensions,” JHEP
Original
1957
Earlier work this paper cites.
S. M. Kuzenko and S. Theisen, “Correlation functions of conserved currents in 𝒩 = 2 \mathcal{N}=2 superconformal theory,” Class. Quant. Grav
2000
Earlier work this paper cites.
J. M. Maldacena and C. Núñez, “Supergravity description of field theories on curved manifolds and a no go theorem,” Int. J. Mod. Phys
2001
Earlier work this paper cites.
J. M. Maldacena and C. Núñez, “Towards the large N N limit of pure 𝒩 = 1 \mathcal{N}=1 superYang-Mills,” Phys. Rev. Lett
2001
Earlier work this paper cites.
K. A. Intriligator and B. Wecht, “The exact superconformal R-symmetry maximizes a a ,” Nucl. Phys
2003
Earlier work this paper cites.
D. M. Hofman and J. Maldacena, “Conformal collider physics: Energy and charge correlations,” JHEP
Original
2008
Earlier work this paper cites.
Y. Tachikawa and B. Wecht, “Explanation of the central charge ratio 27/32 in four-dimensional renormalization group flows between superconformal theories,” Phys. Rev. Lett
Original
2009
Earlier work this paper cites.
Y. Tachikawa, “Six-dimensional D(N) theory and four-dimensional SO-USp quivers,” JHEP
Original
2009
Earlier work this paper cites.
L. F. Alday, D. Gaiotto, and Y. Tachikawa, “Liouville correlation functions from four-dimensional gauge theories,” Lett. Math. Phys
Original
2010
Earlier work this paper cites.
F. Benini, Y. Tachikawa, and B. Wecht, “Sicilian gauge theories and 𝒩 = 1 \mathcal{N}=1 dualities,” JHEP
Original
2010
Earlier work this paper cites.

Similar

J. J. Heckman, Y. Tachikawa, C. Vafa, and B. Wecht, “N = 1 SCFTs from Brane Monodromy,” JHEP
Original
2010
Cited alongside, same era.
O. Chacaltana and J. Distler, “Tinkertoys for Gaiotto duality,” JHEP
Original
2010
Cited alongside, same era.
D. Gaiotto, A. Neitzke, and Y. Tachikawa, “Argyres–Seiberg duality and the Higgs branch,” Commun. Math. Phys
Original
2010
Cited alongside, same era.
F. Benini, Y. Tachikawa, and B. Wecht, “Sicilian gauge theories and 𝒩 = 1 \mathcal{N}=1 dualities,” JHEP
Original
2010
Cited alongside, same era.
M. Kulaxizi and A. Parnachev, “Energy flux positivity and unitarity in CFTs,” Phys. Rev. Lett
Original

Then

I. Bah and B. Wecht, “New 𝒩 = 1 \mathcal{N}=1 superconformal field theories in four dimensions,” JHEP
Original
2013
Later among the works it cites.
K. Maruyoshi, Y. Tachikawa, W. Yan, and K. Yonekura, “ 𝒩 = 1 \mathcal{N}=1 dynamics with T N T_{N} theory,” JHEP
Original
2013
Later among the works it cites.
D. Gaiotto, L. Rastelli, and S. S. Razamat, “Bootstrapping the superconformal index with surface defects,” JHEP
Original
2013
Later among the works it cites.
C. Beem and A. Gadde, “The 𝒩 = 1 \mathcal{N}=1 superconformal index for class 𝒮 \mathcal{S} fixed points,” JHEP
Original
2014
Later among the works it cites.
D. Xie, “M5-brane and four-dimensional 𝒩 = 1 \mathcal{N}=1 theories I,” JHEP

Beyond the bibliography

alphaXiv searches the wider corpus for related work and actual follow-ups.

Open on alphaXiv

alphaXiv is searching for related work…

Reading the bibliography…

2016

$\mathcal{N} = 1$ superconformal theories with $D_N$ blocks

Fazzi, Marco, Giacomelli, Simone

Understand

We study the chiral ring of four-dimensional superconformal field theories obtained by wrapping M5-branes on a complex curve inside a Calabi-Yau three-fold.

We propose a field theoretic construction of all the theories found by Bah, Beem, Bobev and Wecht by introducing new building blocks, and prove several $\mathcal{N} = 1$ dualities featuring the latter.
We match the central charges with those computed from the M5-brane anomaly polynomial, perform the counting of relevant operators and analyze unitarity bound violations.
As a byproduct, we compute the exact dimension of "heavy operators" obtained by wrapping an M2-brane on the complex curve.