Fetching the paper…
Reading the bibliography…
In many settings, an effective way of evaluating objects of interest is to collect evaluations from dispersed individuals and to aggregate these evaluations together.
Game-theoretic approaches to trading processes
R. Wilson · 1987
Earlier work this paper cites.
A Bayesian truth serum for subjective data
Dražen Prelec · 2004
Earlier work this paper cites.
A method of automatic grade calibration in peer assessment
John Hamer, Kenneth TK Ma, and Hugh HF Kwong · 2005
Earlier work this paper cites.
Enforcing truthful strategies in incentive compatible reputation mechanisms
Radu Jurca and Boi Faltings · 2005
Earlier work this paper cites.
Eliciting informative feedback: The peer-prediction method
Nolan Miller, Paul Resnick, and Richard Zeckhauser · 2005
Earlier work this paper cites.
Scaffolded writing and rewriting in the discipline: A web-based reciprocal peer review system
Kwangsu Cho and Christian D Schunn · 2007
Earlier work this paper cites.
Strictly proper scoring rules, prediction, and estimation
Tilmann Gneiting and Adrian E Raftery · 2007
Earlier work this paper cites.
Peering into large lectures: examining peer and expert mark agreement using peerScholar, an online peer assessment tool
Dwayne E Paré and Steve Joordens · 2008
Earlier work this paper cites.
Mechanisms for making crowds truthful
Radu Jurca and Boi Faltings · 2009
Earlier work this paper cites.
Designing incentives for inexpert human raters
Aaron D Shaw, John J Horton, and Daniel L Chen · 2011
Earlier work this paper cites.
Eliciting truthful measurements from a community of sensors
Boi Faltings, Jimmy J Li, and Radu Jurca · 2012
Earlier work this paper cites.
Measuring the prevalence of questionable research practices with incentives for truth telling
Leslie K John, George Loewenstein, and Drazen Prelec · 2012
Earlier work this paper cites.
A robust Bayesian truth serum for small populations
Jens Witkowski and David C Parkes · 2012
Cited alongside, same era.
Crowdsourced judgement elicitation with endogenous proficiency
Anirban Dasgupta and Arpita Ghosh · 2013
Cited alongside, same era.
A robust Bayesian truth serum for non-binary signals
Goran Radanovic and Boi Faltings · 2013
Cited alongside, same era.
A case for ordinal peer-evaluation in moocs
Nihar B Shah, Joseph K Bradley, Abhay Parekh, Martin Wainwright, and Kannan Ramchandran · 2013
Cited alongside, same era.
Learning the prior in minimal peer prediction
Jens Witkowski and David C Parkes · 2013
Cited alongside, same era.
Dwelling on the negative: Incentivizing effort in peer prediction
Jens Witkowski, Yoram Bachrach, Peter Key, and David Christopher Parkes · 2013
Cited alongside, same era.
Methods for ordinal peer grading
Karthik Raman and Thorsten Joachims · 2014
Later among the works it cites.
Minimum truth serums with optional predictions
Blake Riley · 2014
Later among the works it cites.
Output agreement mechanisms and common knowledge
Bo Waggoner and Yiling Chen · 2014
Later among the works it cites.
Elicitability and knowledge-free elicitation with peer prediction
Peter Zhang and Yiling Chen · 2014
Later among the works it cites.
Aggregating partial rankings with applications to peer grading in massive online open courses
Ioannis Caragiannis, George A Krimpas, and Alexandros A Voudouris · 2015
Later among the works it cites.
Incentives for truthful peer grading
Luca de Alfaro, Vassilis Polychronopoulos, and Michael Shavlovsky · 2015
Later among the works it cites.
alphaXiv searches the wider corpus for related work and actual follow-ups.
alphaXiv is searching for related work…
Crowdgrader: A tool for crowdsourcing the evaluation of homework assignments
Luca de Alfaro and Michael Shavlovsky · 2014
Cited alongside, same era.
Incentives to counter bias in human computation
Boi Faltings, Radu Jurca, Pearl Pu, and Bao Duy Tran · 2014
Cited alongside, same era.
Trick or treat: putting peer prediction to the test
Xi Alice Gao, Andrew Mao, Yiling Chen, and Ryan Prescott Adams · 2014
Cited alongside, same era.
Scaling short-answer grading by combining peer assessment with algorithmic scoring
Chinmay E Kulkarni, Richard Socher, Michael S Bernstein, and Scott R Klemmer · 2014
Cited alongside, same era.
Incentives for truthful information elicitation of continuous signals
Goran Radanovic and Boi Faltings · 2014
Cited alongside, same era.
Vijay Kamble, Nihar Shah, David Marn, Abhay Parekh, and Kannan Ramachandran · 2015
Later among the works it cites.
Incentives for subjective evaluations with private beliefs
Goran Radanovic and Boi Faltings · 2015
Later among the works it cites.
Mechanical TA: Partially automated high-stakes peer grading
James R Wright, Chris Thornton, and Kevin Leyton-Brown · 2015
Later among the works it cites.
Putting peer prediction under the micro(economic)scope and making truth-telling focal
Yuqing Kong, Katrina Ligett, and Grant Schoenebeck · 2016
Closest in time.
Informed truthfulness in multi-task peer prediction
Victor Shnayder, Arpit Agarwal, Rafael Frongillo, and David C Parkes · 2016
Closest in time.