Built on

A. Lewis and S. Bridle, Cosmological parameters from CMB and other data: A Monte Carlo approach
2002
Earlier work this paper cites.
J. Lesgourgues, S. Pastor, and L. Perotto, Probing Neutrino Masses with Future Galaxy Redshift Surveys
2004
Earlier work this paper cites.
A. Slosar, Detecting Neutrino Mass Difference with Cosmology
2006
Earlier work this paper cites.
R. Jimenez, T. Kitching, C. Pena-Garay, and L. Verde, Can We Measure the Neutrino Mass Hierarchy in the Sky?
Original
2010
Earlier work this paper cites.
F. Beutler, C. Blake, M. Colless, D. H. Jones, L. Staveley-Smith, et al., The 6dF Galaxy Survey: Baryon Acoustic Oscillations and the Local Hubble Constant
Original
2011
Earlier work this paper cites.
J. Hamann, S. Hannestad, and Y. Y. Y. Wong, Measuring Neutrino Masses with a Future Galaxy Survey
Original
2012
Earlier work this paper cites.
A. C. Hall and A. Challinor, Probing the Neutrino Mass Hierarchy with CMB Weak Lensing
Original
2012
Earlier work this paper cites.
1308.0106
Original
NOvA · 2013
Earlier work this paper cites.
L. Anderson et al., The clustering of galaxies in the SDSS-III Baryon Oscillation Spectroscopic Survey: Baryon Acoustic Oscillations in the Data Release 9 Spectroscopic Galaxy Sample
Original
2013
Earlier work this paper cites.

Similar

B. Audren, J. Lesgourgues, S. Bird, M. G. Haehnelt, and M. Viel, Neutrino masses and cosmological parameters from a Euclid-like survey: Markov Chain Monte Carlo forecasts including theoretical errors
Original
2013
Cited alongside, same era.
M. C. A. Cerbolini, B. Sartoris, J.-Q. Xia, A. Biviano, S. Borgani, et al., Constraining neutrino properties with a Euclid-like galaxy cluster survey
Original
2013
Cited alongside, same era.
M. Blennow, P. Coloma, P. Huber, and T. Schwetz, Quantifying the Sensitivity of Oscillation Experiments to the Neutrino Mass Ordering
Original
2014
Cited alongside, same era.
M. C. Gonzalez-Garcia, M. Maltoni, and T. Schwetz, Updated Fit to Three Neutrino Mixing: Status of Leptonic CP Violation
Original
2014
Cited alongside, same era.
M. Blennow, On the Bayesian Approach to Neutrino Mass Ordering

Then

J. Bergstrom, M. C. Gonzalez-Garcia, M. Maltoni, and T. Schwetz, Bayesian Global Analysis of Neutrino Oscillation Data
Original
2015
Later among the works it cites.
A. J. Ross, L. Samushia, C. Howlett, W. J. Percival, A. Burden, et al., The clustering of the SDSS DR7 main Galaxy sample – I. A 4 per cent distance measure at z = 0.15 z=0.15
Original
2015
Later among the works it cites.
K. N. Abazajian et al., Neutrino Physics from the Cosmic Microwave Background and Large Scale Structure
Original
2015
Later among the works it cites.
R. Allison, P. Caucal, E. Calabrese, J. Dunkley, and T. Louis, Towards a Cosmological Neutrino Mass Detection
Original
2015
Later among the works it cites.
T. Basse, J. Hamann, S. Hannestad, and Y. Y. Y. Wong, Getting leverage on inflation with a large photometric redshift survey

Beyond the bibliography

alphaXiv searches the wider corpus for related work and actual follow-ups.

Open on alphaXiv

alphaXiv is searching for related work…

Reading the bibliography…

2016

Cosmology and the neutrino mass ordering

Hannestad, Steen, Schwetz, Thomas

Understand

We propose a simple method to quantify a possible exclusion of the inverted neutrino mass ordering from cosmological bounds on the sum of the neutrino masses.

The method is based on Bayesian inference and allows for a calculation of the posterior odds of normal versus inverted ordering.
We apply the method for a specific set of current data from Planck CMB data and large-scale structure surveys, providing an upper bound on the sum of neutrino masses of 0.14 eV at 95% CL.
With this analysis we obtain posterior odds for normal versus inverted ordering of about 2:1.