Fetching the paper…

Reading the bibliography…

2016

Precursors, Gauge Invariance, and Quantum Error Correction in AdS/CFT

Freivogel, Ben, Jefferson, Robert A., Kabir, Laurens

Original
PDF
Post on X

Understand

A puzzling aspect of the AdS/CFT correspondence is that a single bulk operator can be mapped to multiple different boundary operators, or precursors.

By improving upon a recent model of Mintun, Polchinski, and Rosenhaus, we demonstrate explicitly how this ambiguity arises in a simple model of the field theory.
In particular, we show how gauge invariance in the boundary theory manifests as a freedom in the smearing function used in the bulk-boundary mapping, and explicitly show how this freedom can be used to localize the precursor in different spatial regions.
We also show how the ambiguity can be understood in terms of quantum error correction, by appealing to the entanglement present in the CFT.

Precursors, Gauge Invariance, and Quantum Error Correction in AdS/CFT · Around

Built on

J. Polchinski, L. Susskind, and N. Toumbas, “Negative energy, superluminosity, and holography,” Phys. Rev. D 60
1999
Earlier work this paper cites.
R. Cleve, D. Gottesman, and H-K. Lo, “How to share a quantum secret,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 83
1999
Earlier work this paper cites.
I. R. Klebanov and E. Witten, “AdS/CFT correspondence and symmetry breaking,” Nucl. Phys. B 556
1999
Earlier work this paper cites.
S. B. Giddings and M. Lippert, “Precursors, black holes, and a locality bound,” Phys. Rev. D 65
2001
Earlier work this paper cites.
B. Freivogel, S. B. Giddings, and M. Lippert, “Toward a theory of precursors,” Phys. Rev. D 66
2002
Earlier work this paper cites.
A. Hamilton et al., “Local bulk operators in AdS/CFT: a boundary view of horizons and locality,” Phys. Rev. D 73
2005
Earlier work this paper cites.
A. Hamilton et al., “Holographic representations of local bulk operators,” Phys. Rev. D 74
2006
Earlier work this paper cites.
A. Hamilton et al., “Local bulk operators in AdS/CFT: a holographic description of the black hole interior,” Phys. Rev. D 75
2007
Earlier work this paper cites.
B. Chilian and K. Fredenhagen, “The time slice axiom in perturbative quantum field theory on globally hyperbolic spacetimes,” Commun. Math. Phys. (2008), arXiv:0802.1642
Original
2008
Earlier work this paper cites.
T. Andrade and D. Marolf, “AdS/CFT beyond the unitarity bound,” JHEP (2012), arXiv:1105.6337
Original
2012
Earlier work this paper cites.

Similar

B. Czech et al., “The gravity dual of a density matrix,” (2012), arXiv:1204.1330
Original
2012
Cited alongside, same era.
A. C. Wall, “Maximin surfaces, and the strong subadditivity of the covariant holographic entanglement entropy,” Class. Quantum Grav. 31
Original
2012
Cited alongside, same era.
D. Kabat and G. Lifschytz, “Decoding the hologram: scalar fields interacting with gravity,” Phys. Rev. D 89
Original
2013
Cited alongside, same era.
A. Lewkowycz and J. Maldacena, “Generalized gravitational entropy,” JHEP (2013), arXiv:1304.4926
Original
2013
Cited alongside, same era.
T. Faulkner, A. Lewkowycz, and J. Maldacena, “Quantum corrections to holographic entanglement entropy,” JHEP (2013), arXiv:1307.2892

Then

B. Freivogel et al., “Casting shadows on holographic reconstruction,” Phys. Rev. D 91
Original
2014
Later among the works it cites.
A. Almheiri, X. Dong, and D. Harlow, “Bulk locality and quantum error correction in AdS/CFT,” JHEP (2015), arXiv:1411.7041
Original
2015
Later among the works it cites.
F. Pastawski et al., “Holographic quantum error-correcting codes: toy models for the bulk/boundary correspondence,” JHEP (2015), arXiv:1503.06237
Original
2015
Later among the works it cites.
Z. Yang, P. Hayden, and X. Qi, “Bidirectional holographic codes and sub-AdS locality,” (2015), arXiv:1510.03784
Original
2015
Later among the works it cites.
E. Mintun, J. Polchinski, and V. Rosenhaus, “Bulk-boundary duality, gauge invariance, and quantum error correction,” (2015), arXiv:1501.06577

Beyond the bibliography

alphaXiv searches the wider corpus for related work and actual follow-ups.

Open on alphaXiv

alphaXiv is searching for related work…

2013

Cited alongside, same era.

S. Leichenauer and V. Rosenhaus, “AdS black holes, the bulk-boundary dictionary, and smearing functions,” Phys. Rev. D 88

2013

Cited alongside, same era.

R. Bousso et al., “Null geodesics, local CFT operators and AdS/CFT for subregions,” Phys. Rev. D 88

2013

Cited alongside, same era.

V. E. Hubeny et al., “Holographic entanglement plateaux,” JHEP (2013), arXiv:1306.4004

2013

Cited alongside, same era.

M. Headrick et al., “Causality & holographic entanglement entropy,” (2014), arXiv:1408.6300

2014

Cited alongside, same era.

I. A. Morrison, “Boundary-to-bulk maps for AdS causal wedges and the Reeh-Schlieder property in holography,” JHEP (2014), arXiv:1403.3426

2014

Cited alongside, same era.

2015

Later among the works it cites.

M. Guica and D. L. Jafferis, “On the construction of charged operators inside an eternal black hole,” (2015), arXiv:1511.05627

Original

2015

Later among the works it cites.

S. Leichenauer and M. Moosa, “Entanglement tsunami in (1+1)-dimensions,” Phys. Rev. D 92

2015

Later among the works it cites.

P. Hayden et al., “Holographic duality from random tensor networks,” (2016), arXiv:1601.01694

2016

Closest in time.

X. Dong, D. Harlow, and A. C. Wall, “Bulk reconstruction in the entanglement wedge in AdS/CFT,” (2016), arXiv:1601.05416

2016

Closest in time.

N. Bao and I. H. Kim, “Precursor problem and holographic mutual information,” (2016), arXiv:1601.07616

2016

Closest in time.