Fetching the paper…
Reading the bibliography…
We study supersymmetry breaking in theories with non-minimal multiplets (such as the complex linear or CNM multiplets), by using superspace higher derivative terms which give rise to new supersymmetry breaking vacuum solutions on top of the standard supersymmetric vacuum.
S. Ferrara and B. Zumino, “Transformation Properties of the Supercurrent,” Nucl. Phys. B 87
1975
Earlier work this paper cites.
M. Rocek, “Linearizing the Volkov-Akulov Model,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 41
1978
Earlier work this paper cites.
E. A. Ivanov and A. A. Kapustnikov, “General Relationship Between Linear and Nonlinear Realizations of Supersymmetry,” J. Phys. A 11
1978
Earlier work this paper cites.
U. Lindstrom and M. Rocek, “Constrained Local Superfields,” Phys. Rev. D 19
1979
Earlier work this paper cites.
S. J. Gates, Jr. and W. Siegel, “Variant Superfield Representations,” Nucl. Phys. B 187
1981
Earlier work this paper cites.
E. A. Ivanov and A. A. Kapustnikov, “The Nonlinear Realization Structure Of Models With Spontaneously Broken Supersymmetry,” J. Phys. G 8
1982
Earlier work this paper cites.
S. J. Gates, M. T. Grisaru, M. Rocek and W. Siegel, “Superspace Or One Thousand and One Lessons in Supersymmetry,” Front. Phys. 58
1983
Earlier work this paper cites.
S. Samuel and J. Wess, “A Superfield Formulation of the Nonlinear Realization of Supersymmetry and Its Coupling to Supergravity,” Nucl. Phys. B 221
1983
Earlier work this paper cites.
U. Lindstrom and M. Rocek, “Scalar Tensor Duality and N=1, N=2 Nonlinear Sigma Models,” Nucl. Phys. B 222
1983
Earlier work this paper cites.
S. Ferrara, L. Girardello, T. Kugo and A. Van Proeyen, “Relation Between Different Auxiliary Field Formulations of N = 1 N=1 Supergravity Coupled to Matter,” Nucl. Phys. B 223
1983
Earlier work this paper cites.
B. B. Deo and S. J. Gates, “Comments On Nonminimal N=1 Scalar Multiplets,” Nucl. Phys. B 254
1985
Earlier work this paper cites.
S. Cecotti, “Higher Derivative Supergravity Is Equivalent To Standard Supergravity Coupled To Matter. 1.,” Phys. Lett. B 190
1987
Earlier work this paper cites.
S. Cecotti, S. Ferrara and L. Girardello, “Structure of the Scalar Potential in General N = 1 N=1 Higher Derivative Supergravity in Four-dimensions,” Phys. Lett. B 187
1987
Earlier work this paper cites.
K. i. Shizuya, “Supercurrents and Superconformal Symmetry,” Phys. Rev. D 35
1987
Earlier work this paper cites.
S. Cecotti, S. Ferrara, M. Porrati and S. Sabharwal, “New Minimal Higher Derivative Supergravity Coupled To Matter,” Nucl. Phys. B 306
1988
Earlier work this paper cites.
R. Casalbuoni, S. De Curtis, D. Dominici, F. Feruglio and R. Gatto, “Nonlinear Realization of Supersymmetry Algebra From Supersymmetric Constraint,” Phys. Lett. B 220
1989
Earlier work this paper cites.
T. E. Clark and S. T. Love, “The Supercurrent and Spontaneously Broken Supersymmetry,” Phys. Rev. D 39
1989
Earlier work this paper cites.
I. L. Buchbinder, S. Kuzenko and Z. Yarevskaya, “Supersymmetric effective potential: Superfield approach,” Nucl. Phys. B 411
1994
Earlier work this paper cites.
I. L. Buchbinder, S. M. Kuzenko and A. Y. Petrov, “Superfield chiral effective potential,” Phys. Lett. B 321
1994
Earlier work this paper cites.
S. J. Gates, Jr., “Why auxiliary fields matter: The Strange case of the 4-D, N=1 supersymmetric QCD effective action,” Phys. Lett. B 365
1996
Cited alongside, same era.
T. E. Clark and S. T. Love, “The Supercurrent in supersymmetric field theories,” Int. J. Mod. Phys. A 11
1996
Cited alongside, same era.
S. J. Gates, Jr., “Why auxiliary fields matter: The strange case of the 4-D, N=1 supersymmetric QCD effective action. 2.,” Nucl. Phys. B 485
1997
Cited alongside, same era.
M. T. Grisaru, A. Van Proeyen and D. Zanon, “Quantization of the complex linear superfield,” Nucl. Phys. B 502
1997
Cited alongside, same era.
S. Penati, A. Refolli, A. Van Proeyen and D. Zanon, “The Nonminimal scalar multiplet: Duality, sigma model, beta function,” Nucl. Phys. B 514
1998
Cited alongside, same era.
S. M. Kuzenko, “Variant supercurrents and Noether procedure,” Eur. Phys. J. C 71
2011
Later among the works it cites.
S. M. Kuzenko and S. J. Tyler, “On the Goldstino actions and their symmetries,” JHEP 1105
2011
Later among the works it cites.
2011
Later among the works it cites.
2012
Later among the works it cites.
alphaXiv searches the wider corpus for related work and actual follow-ups.
alphaXiv is searching for related work…
F. Gonzalez-Rey, M. Rocek, S. Wiles, U. Lindstrom and R. von Unge, “Feynman rules in N=2 projective superspace: 1. Massless hypermultiplets,” Nucl. Phys. B 516
1998
Cited alongside, same era.
F. Gonzalez-Rey and R. von Unge, “Feynman rules in N=2 projective superspace. 2. Massive hypermultiplets,” Nucl. Phys. B 516
1998
Cited alongside, same era.
S. Penati and D. Zanon, “The Nonminimal scalar multiplet coupled to supersymmetric Yang-Mills,” Phys. Lett. B 421
1998
Cited alongside, same era.
M. Rocek and A. A. Tseytlin, “Partial breaking of global D = 4 supersymmetry, constrained superfields, and three-brane actions,” Phys. Rev. D 59
1999
Cited alongside, same era.
F. Gonzalez-Rey, I. Y. Park and M. Rocek, “On dual 3-brane actions with partially broken N=2 supersymmetry,” Nucl. Phys. B 544
1999
Cited alongside, same era.
H. Osborn, “N=1 superconformal symmetry in four-dimensional quantum field theory,” Annals Phys. 272
1999
Cited alongside, same era.
M. Magro, I. Sachs and S. Wolf, “Superfield Noether procedure,” Annals Phys. 298
2002
Cited alongside, same era.
2012
Later among the works it cites.
2012
Later among the works it cites.
2012
Later among the works it cites.
2013
Later among the works it cites.
2013
Later among the works it cites.
2013
Later among the works it cites.
2013
Later among the works it cites.
2013
Later among the works it cites.
2014
Later among the works it cites.
2014
Later among the works it cites.
2014
Later among the works it cites.
2014
Later among the works it cites.
2015
Closest in time.