Built on

A. Alloul, N. D. Christensen, C. Degrande, C. Duhr, and B. Fuks, FeynRules 2.0 - A complete toolbox for tree-level phenomenology
Original
1921
Earlier work this paper cites.
F. Wilczek, Problem of Strong P and T Invariance in the Presence of Instantons
1978
Earlier work this paper cites.
S. Weinberg, A New Light Boson?
1978
Earlier work this paper cites.
B. Holdom, Two U(1)’s and Epsilon Charge Shifts
1986
Earlier work this paper cites.
K. Griest and M. Kamionkowski, Unitarity Limits on the Mass and Radius of Dark Matter Particles
1990
Earlier work this paper cites.
UA2 Collaboration
1993
Earlier work this paper cites.
C. D. Carone and H. Murayama, Realistic models with a light U(1) gauge boson coupled to baryon number
1995
Earlier work this paper cites.
K. Babu, C. F. Kolda, and J. March-Russell, Implications of generalized Z - Z ′ Z^{\prime} mixing
1998
Earlier work this paper cites.
T. Junk, Confidence level computation for combining searches with small statistics
1999
Earlier work this paper cites.
T. Sjostrand, S. Mrenna, and P. Z. Skands, PYTHIA 6.4 Physics and Manual
2006
Earlier work this paper cites.
P. M. Nadolsky, H.-L. Lai, Q.-H. Cao, J. Huston, J. Pumplin, et al., Implications of CTEQ global analysis for collider observables
Original
2008
Earlier work this paper cites.
M. Cacciari, G. P. Salam, and G. Soyez, The anti- k t k_{t} jet clustering algorithm
Original
2008
Earlier work this paper cites.
M. Beltran, D. Hooper, E. W. Kolb, and Z. C. Krusberg, Deducing the nature of dark matter from direct and indirect detection experiments in the absence of collider signatures of new physics
Original
2009
Earlier work this paper cites.
E. Dudas, Y. Mambrini, S. Pokorski, and A. Romagnoni, (In)visible Z ′ Z^{\prime} and dark matter
Original
2009
Earlier work this paper cites.
CDF Collaboration
Original
2009
Earlier work this paper cites.
A. Martin, W. Stirling, R. Thorne, and G. Watt, Parton distributions for the LHC
Original
2009
Earlier work this paper cites.
M. Beltran, D. Hooper, E. W. Kolb, Z. A. Krusberg, and T. M. Tait, Maverick dark matter at colliders
Original
2010
Earlier work this paper cites.
Y. Bai, P. J. Fox, and R. Harnik, The Tevatron at the Frontier of Dark Matter Direct Detection
Original
2010
Earlier work this paper cites.
J. Goodman, M. Ibe, A. Rajaraman, W. Shepherd, T. M. Tait, et al., Constraints on Dark Matter from Colliders
Original
2010
Earlier work this paper cites.
P. J. Fox, J. Liu, D. Tucker-Smith, and N. Weiner, An Effective Z’
Original
2011
Earlier work this paper cites.
Q.-H. Cao, C.-R. Chen, C. S. Li, and H. Zhang, Effective Dark Matter Model: Relic density, CDMS II, Fermi LAT and LHC
Original
2011
Earlier work this paper cites.
E. J. Chun, J.-C. Park, and S. Scopel, Dark matter and a new gauge boson through kinetic mixing
Original
2011
Earlier work this paper cites.
M. T. Frandsen, F. Kahlhoefer, S. Sarkar, and K. Schmidt-Hoberg, Direct detection of dark matter in models with a light Z’
Original
2011
Earlier work this paper cites.
D. Hooper and L. Goodenough, Dark Matter Annihilation in The Galactic Center As Seen by the Fermi Gamma Ray Space Telescope
Original
2011
Earlier work this paper cites.
D. Hooper and T. Linden, On The Origin Of The Gamma Rays From The Galactic Center
Original
2011
Earlier work this paper cites.

Similar

A. Rajaraman, W. Shepherd, T. M. Tait, and A. M. Wijangco, LHC Bounds on Interactions of Dark Matter
Original
2011
Cited alongside, same era.
J. Goodman, M. Ibe, A. Rajaraman, W. Shepherd, T. M. Tait, et al., Constraints on Light Majorana dark Matter from Colliders
Original
2011
Cited alongside, same era.
E. Accomando, A. Belyaev, L. Fedeli, S. F. King, and C. Shepherd-Themistocleous, Z’ physics with early LHC data
Original
2011
Cited alongside, same era.
M. T. Frandsen, F. Kahlhoefer, A. Preston, S. Sarkar, and K. Schmidt-Hoberg, LHC and Tevatron Bounds on the Dark Matter Direct Detection Cross-Section for Vector Mediators
Original
2012
Cited alongside, same era.
J. March-Russell, J. Unwin, and S. M. West, Closing in on Asymmetric Dark Matter I: Model independent limits for interactions with quarks

Then

G. Arcadi, Y. Mambrini, M. H. G. Tytgat, and B. Zaldivar, Invisible Z ′ Z^{\prime} and dark matter: LHC vs LUX constraints
Original
2014
Later among the works it cites.
O. Lebedev and Y. Mambrini, Axial dark matter: The case for an invisible Z ′ Z′
Original
2014
Later among the works it cites.
O. Buchmueller, M. J. Dolan, and C. McCabe, Beyond Effective Field Theory for Dark Matter Searches at the LHC
Original
2014
Later among the works it cites.
M. Fairbairn and J. Heal, Complementarity of dark matter searches at resonance
Original
2014
Later among the works it cites.
G. Busoni, A. De Simone, E. Morgante, and A. Riotto, On the Validity of the Effective Field Theory for Dark Matter Searches at the LHC

Beyond the bibliography

alphaXiv searches the wider corpus for related work and actual follow-ups.

Open on alphaXiv

alphaXiv is searching for related work…

Reading the bibliography…

2015

Constraining Dark Sectors with Monojets and Dijets

Chala, Mikael, Kahlhoefer, Felix, McCullough, Matthew et al.

Understand

We consider dark sector particles (DSPs) that obtain sizeable interactions with Standard Model fermions from a new mediator.

While these particles can avoid observation in direct detection experiments, they are strongly constrained by LHC measurements.
We demonstrate that there is an important complementarity between searches for DSP production and searches for the mediator itself, in particular bounds on (broad) dijet resonances.
This observation is crucial not only in the case where the DSP is all of the dark matter but whenever - precisely due to its sizeable interactions with the visible sector - the DSP annihilates away so efficiently that it only forms a dark matter subcomponent.