Fetching the paper…
Reading the bibliography…
The second law of thermodynamics, formulated as an ultimate bound on the maximum extractable work, has been rigorously derived in multiple scenarios.
D. Ruelle, Statistical mechanics: Rigorous results
1969
Earlier work this paper cites.
E. Ruch, R. Schranner, and T. H. Seligman, J. Chem. Phys. 69
1978
Earlier work this paper cites.
R. Alicki, J. Phys. A 12
1979
Earlier work this paper cites.
C. Jarzynski, Phys. Rev. Lett. 78,
1997
Earlier work this paper cites.
R. Bhatia, Matrix analysis
1997
Earlier work this paper cites.
C. Jarzynski, J. Stat. Phys. 96
1999
Earlier work this paper cites.
H. D. Janzing, P. Wocjan, R. Zeier, R. Geiss, and T. Beth, Int. J. Th. Phys. 39
2000
Earlier work this paper cites.
R. Alicki, M. Horodecki, P. Horodecki and R. Horodecki. Open Syst. Inf. Dyn. 11,
2004
Earlier work this paper cites.
A. E. Allahverdyan and Th. M. Nieuwenhuizen, Phys. Rev. E 71,
2005
Earlier work this paper cites.
N. Linden, S. Popescu and P. Skrzypczyk, Phys. Rev. Lett 105,
2010
Cited alongside, same era.
M. Esposito and C. Van den Broeck. Europhys. Lett. 95,
2011
Cited alongside, same era.
N. Brunner, N. Linden, S. Popescu and P. Skrzypczyk, Phys. Rev. E 85,
2012
Cited alongside, same era.
A. Riera, C. Gogolin, and J. Eisert, Phys. Rev. Lett. 108,
2012
Cited alongside, same era.
J. Anders and V. Giovannetti, New J. Phys. 15
2013
Cited alongside, same era.
J. Aberg, Nature Comm. 4
2013
Cited alongside, same era.
M. Horodecki and J. Oppenheim, Nature Comm. 4
2013
J. M. Renes, Euro. Phys. J. Plus 129
2014
Closest in time.
J. Rossnagel, O. Abah, F. Schmidt-Kaler, K. Singer, and E. Lutz, Phys. Rev. Lett. 112,
2014
Closest in time.
J. Aberg, Phys. Rev. Lett. 113
2014
Closest in time.
J. Eisert, M. Friesdorf, and C. Gogolin, Nature Phys. 11
2015
Closest in time.
D. Egloff, O. C. O. Dahlsten, R. Renner and V. Vedral, New J. Phys. 17
2015
Closest in time.
F. G. S. L. Brandao, M. Horodecki, N. H. Y. Ng, J. Oppenheim, and S. Wehner, PNAS 112
2015
Closest in time.
N. H. Y. Ng, L. Mancinska, C. Cirstoiu, J. Eisert, and S. Wehner, New J. Phys. 17
alphaXiv searches the wider corpus for related work and actual follow-ups.
alphaXiv is searching for related work…
Cited alongside, same era.
F. G. S. L. Brandao, M. Horodecki, J. Oppenheim, J. M. Renes, and R. W. Spekkens, Phys. Rev. Lett. 111
2013
Cited alongside, same era.
R. Gallego, A. Riera, and J. Eisert, Thermal machines beyond the weak coupling regime, New J. Phys. 16
2014
Cited alongside, same era.
This observation is related in spirit with Ref. [ 19 ] . However, there control is used to couple the working system to a engineered non-equilibrium bath. Our result is different in the sense that it proves control advantageous for thermal baths in equilibrium
Cited in the paper.
We will assume that ℋ ( H 0 ) \mathcal{H}(H_{0}) is path-connected, which as we will see later is naturally fulfilled in relevant specific limitations on ℋ \mathcal{H}
Cited in the paper.
Using time-dependent Hamiltonian dynamics to model work-extraction is standard in the literature on quantum thermodynamics [ 8 , 23 , 11 , 6 ] . It is, however, an ongoing debate whether measuring the work done on in such a process by the energy expectation is fully justified [ 22 ] . We have chosen this work-measure as it simplifies the analysis in this work considerably and we expect that similar effects as our main results will remain true also for other work-measures
Cited in the paper.
2015
Closest in time.
P. Faist, J. Oppenheim, and R. Renner, New J. Phys. 17
2015
Closest in time.