Built on

L. Maiani, G. Parisi, and R. Petronzio, Nucl. Phys. B136
1978
Earlier work this paper cites.
N. V. Krasnikov, Yad. Fiz. 28
1978
Earlier work this paper cites.
N. Cabibbo, L. Maiani, G. Parisi, and R. Petronzio, Nucl. Phys. B158
1979
Earlier work this paper cites.
P. Q. Hung, Phys. Rev. Lett. 42
1979
Earlier work this paper cites.
H. D. Politzer and S. Wolfram, Phys. Lett. B82
1979
Earlier work this paper cites.
A. A. Starobinsky, Phys. Lett. B91
1980
Earlier work this paper cites.
M. Lindner, Zeit. Phys. C31
1986
Earlier work this paper cites.
A. Sirlin and R. Zucchini, Nucl.Phys. B266
1986
Earlier work this paper cites.
C. Froggatt and H. B. Nielsen, Phys.Lett. B368
1996
Earlier work this paper cites.
W. Loinaz and R. Willey, Phys.Rev. D56
1997
Earlier work this paper cites.
A. Aguilar-Arevalo et al. (LSND Collaboration), Phys.Rev. D64
2001
Earlier work this paper cites.
T. Asaka and M. Shaposhnikov, Phys. Lett. B620
2005
Earlier work this paper cites.
T. Asaka, S. Blanchet, and M. Shaposhnikov, Phys. Lett. B631
2005
Earlier work this paper cites.
M. Shaposhnikov and I. Tkachev, Phys. Lett. B639
2006
Earlier work this paper cites.
T. Sjostrand, S. Mrenna, and P. Z. Skands, JHEP 0605
2006
Earlier work this paper cites.
G. Bennett et al. (Muon G-2 Collaboration), Phys.Rev. D73
2006
Earlier work this paper cites.
G. F. Giudice, in Perspectives on LHC physics , edited by G. Kane and A. Pierce (2008) pp. 155–178, arXiv:0801.2562 [hep-ph]
Original
2008
Earlier work this paper cites.
F. L. Bezrukov and M. Shaposhnikov, Phys. Lett. B659
Original
2008
Earlier work this paper cites.
T. Sjostrand, S. Mrenna, and P. Z. Skands, Comput.Phys.Commun. 178
Original
2008
Earlier work this paper cites.

Similar

M. Bahr, S. Gieseke, M. Gigg, D. Grellscheid, K. Hamilton, et al. , Eur.Phys.J. C58
Original
2008
Cited alongside, same era.
A. Aguilar-Arevalo et al. (MiniBooNE Collaboration), Phys.Rev.Lett. 102
Original
2009
Cited alongside, same era.
M. Shaposhnikov and C. Wetterich, Phys. Lett. B683
Original
2010
Cited alongside, same era.
A. Kataev and V. Kim, Phys.Part.Nucl. 41
Original
2010
Cited alongside, same era.
A. Buckley, J. Butterworth, S. Gieseke, D. Grellscheid, S. Hoche, et al. , Phys.Rept. 504
Original
2011
Cited alongside, same era.

Then

K. Chetyrkin and M. Zoller, JHEP 1304
Original
2013
Later among the works it cites.
M. Shaposhnikov, PoS EPS-HEP2013
Original
2013
Later among the works it cites.
K. Olive et al. (Particle Data Group), Chin.Phys. C38
2014
Closest in time.
K. Enqvist, T. Meriniemi, and S. Nurmi, JCAP 1407
Original
2014
Closest in time.
M. Herranen, T. Markkanen, S. Nurmi, and A. Rajantie, Phys.Rev.Lett. 113
Original
2014
Closest in time.

Beyond the bibliography

alphaXiv searches the wider corpus for related work and actual follow-ups.

Open on alphaXiv

alphaXiv is searching for related work…

Reading the bibliography…

2014

Why should we care about the top quark Yukawa coupling?

Bezrukov, Fedor, Shaposhnikov, Mikhail

Understand

In the cosmological context, for the Standard Model to be valid up to the scale of inflation, the top quark Yukawa coupling $y_t$ should not exceed the critical value $y_t^{crit}$, coinciding with good precision (about 0.02%) with the requirement of the stability of the electroweak vacuum.

So, the exact measurements of $y_t$ may give an insight on the possible existence and the energy scale of new physics above 100 GeV, which is extremely sensitive to $y_t$.
We overview the most recent theoretical computations of $y_t^{crit}$ and the experimental measurements of $y_t$.
Within the theoretical and experimental uncertainties in $y_t$ the required scale of new physics varies from $10^7$ GeV to the Planck scale, urging for precise determination of the top quark Yukawa coupling.