Fetching the paper…

Reading the bibliography…

2014

Testing the membrane paradigm with holography

de Boer, Jan, Heller, Michal P., Pinzani-Fokeeva, Natalia

Original
PDF
Post on X

Understand

One version of the membrane paradigm states that as far as outside observers are concerned, black holes can be replaced by a dissipative membrane with simple physical properties located at the stretched horizon.

We demonstrate that such a membrane paradigm is incomplete in several aspects.
We argue that it generically fails to capture the massive quasinormal modes, unless we replace the stretched horizon by the exact event horizon, and illustrate this with a scalar field in a BTZ black hole background.
We also consider as a concrete example linearized metric perturbations of a five-dimensional AdS-Schwarzschild black brane and show that a spurious excitation appears in the long-wavelength response that is only removed from the spectrum when the membrane paradigm is replaced by ingoing boundary conditions at the event horizon.

Testing the membrane paradigm with holography · Around

Built on

T. Damour, Phys.Rev. D18
1978
Earlier work this paper cites.
D. Macdonald and K. S. Thorne, Mon. Not. R. astr. Soc. 198
1982
Earlier work this paper cites.
K. S. Thorne, R. Price, and D. Macdonald, (1986)
1986
Earlier work this paper cites.
M. Banados, C. Teitelboim, and J. Zanelli, Phys.Rev.Lett. 69
1992
Earlier work this paper cites.
J. M. Maldacena, Adv.Theor.Math.Phys. 2
1998
Earlier work this paper cites.
S. Gubser, I. R. Klebanov, and A. M. Polyakov, Phys.Lett. B428
1998
Earlier work this paper cites.
E. Witten, Adv.Theor.Math.Phys. 2
1998
Earlier work this paper cites.
M. Parikh and F. Wilczek, Phys.Rev. D58
1998
Earlier work this paper cites.

Similar

D. T. Son and A. O. Starinets, JHEP 0209
2002
Cited alongside, same era.
P. Kovtun, D. T. Son, and A. O. Starinets, JHEP 0310
2003
Cited alongside, same era.
N. Arkani-Hamed, H. Georgi, and M. D. Schwartz, Annals Phys. 305
2003
Cited alongside, same era.
P. K. Kovtun and A. O. Starinets, Phys.Rev. D72
2005
Cited alongside, same era.
S. Bhattacharyya, V. E. Hubeny, S. Minwalla, and M. Rangamani, JHEP 0802
Original
2008
Cited alongside, same era.
T. Damour and M. Lilley, , 371 (2008), arXiv:0802.4169 [hep-th]
Original
2008
Cited alongside, same era.

Then

T. Faulkner, H. Liu, and M. Rangamani, JHEP 1108
Original
2011
Later among the works it cites.
I. Heemskerk and J. Polchinski, JHEP 1106
Original
2011
Later among the works it cites.
D. Nickel and D. T. Son, New J.Phys. 13
Original
2011
Later among the works it cites.
V. E. Hubeny, S. Minwalla, and M. Rangamani, , 348 (2012), arXiv:1107.5780 [hep-th]
Original
2012
Later among the works it cites.
R. F. Penna, R. Narayan, and A. Sadowski, (2013), arXiv:1307.4752 [astro-ph.HE]
Original
2013
Later among the works it cites.

Beyond the bibliography

alphaXiv searches the wider corpus for related work and actual follow-ups.

Open on alphaXiv

alphaXiv is searching for related work…

N. Iqbal and H. Liu, Phys.Rev. D79

2009

Cited alongside, same era.

A. O. Starinets, Phys.Lett. B670

2009

Cited alongside, same era.

Much smaller than any other scale in the problem

Cited in the paper.

We repeated the same calculation in (4+1)-dimensions and found similar behavior

Cited in the paper.

For a massive field, we would typically demand that at u = 0 u=0 the leading fall-off of the solution is fixed

Cited in the paper.

J. de Boer, M. P. Heller, and N. Pinzani-Fokeeva, to appear

Cited in the paper.

R. Emparan, V. E. Hubeny, and M. Rangamani, JHEP 1306

2013

Later among the works it cites.

N. Pinzani-Fokeeva and M. Taylor, (2014), arXiv:1401.5975 [hep-th]

2014

Closest in time.