Built on

A. Datta, M. Duraisamy, and D. Ghosh, “Explaining the B → K ∗ μ + μ − B\to K^{\ast}\mu^{+}\mu^{-} anomaly with scalar interactions,” arXiv:1310.1937 [hep-ph]
Original
1937
Earlier work this paper cites.
R. Gauld, F. Goertz, and U. Haisch, “On minimal Z ′ Z^{\prime} explanations of the B → K ∗ μ + μ − B\to K^{*}\mu^{+}\mu^{-} anomaly,” Phys.Rev
Original
1959
Earlier work this paper cites.
R. Belusevic and J. Smith, “ W W - Z Z Interference in Neutrino - Nucleus Scattering,” Phys.Rev
1988
Earlier work this paper cites.
CHARM-II
1990
Earlier work this paper cites.
X. He, G. C. Joshi, H. Lew, and R. Volkas, “New Z ′ Z^{\prime} penomenology,” Phys.Rev
1991
Earlier work this paper cites.
X.-G. He, G. C. Joshi, H. Lew, and R. Volkas, “Simplest Z ′ Z^{\prime} model,” Phys.Rev
1991
Earlier work this paper cites.
S. Baek, N. Deshpande, X. He, and P. Ko, “Muon anomalous g − 2 g-2 and gauged L μ − L τ L_{\mu}-L_{\tau} models,” Phys.Rev
2001
Earlier work this paper cites.
E. Ma, D. Roy, and S. Roy, “Gauged L μ − L τ L_{\mu}-L_{\tau} with large muon anomalous magnetic moment and the bimaximal mixing of neutrinos,” Phys.Lett
2002
Earlier work this paper cites.
ALEPH, DELPHI, L3, OPAL, SLD, LEP Electroweak Working Group, SLD Electroweak Group, SLD Heavy Flavour Group
2006
Earlier work this paper cites.
T. Sjostrand, S. Mrenna, and P. Z. Skands, “PYTHIA 6.4 Physics and Manual,” JHEP
2006
Earlier work this paper cites.

Similar

P. Langacker, “The Physics of Heavy Z ′ Z^{\prime} Gauge Bosons,” Rev.Mod.Phys
Original
2009
Cited alongside, same era.
M. Pospelov, “Secluded U(1) below the weak scale,” Phys.Rev
Original
2009
Cited alongside, same era.
F. Jegerlehner and A. Nyffeler, “The Muon g − 2 g-2 ,” Phys.Rept
Original
2009
Cited alongside, same era.
E. Salvioni, A. Strumia, G. Villadoro, and F. Zwirner, “Non-universal minimal Z ′ Z^{\prime} models: present bounds and early LHC reach,” JHEP
Original
2010
Cited alongside, same era.
G. Isidori, Y. Nir, and G. Perez, “Flavor Physics Constraints for Physics Beyond the Standard Model,” Ann.Rev.Nucl.Part.Sci
Original

Then

W.-Z. Feng, P. Nath, and G. Peim, “Cosmic Coincidence and Asymmetric Dark Matter in a Stueckelberg Extension,” Phys.Rev
Original
2012
Later among the works it cites.
S. Descotes-Genon, J. Matias, and J. Virto, “Understanding the B → K ∗ μ + μ − B\to K^{*}\mu^{+}\mu^{-} Anomaly,” Phys.Rev
Original
2013
Later among the works it cites.
W. Altmannshofer and D. M. Straub, “New physics in B → K ∗ μ μ B\to K^{*}\mu\mu ?,” Eur.Phys.J
Original
2013
Later among the works it cites.
A. J. Buras and J. Girrbach, “Left-handed Z ′ Z^{\prime} and Z Z FCNC quark couplings facing new b → s μ + μ − b\to s\mu^{+}\mu^{-} data,” JHEP
Original
2013
Later among the works it cites.
A. J. Buras, F. De Fazio, and J. Girrbach, “The Anatomy of Z’ and Z with Flavour Changing Neutral Currents in the Flavour Precision Era,” JHEP

Beyond the bibliography

alphaXiv searches the wider corpus for related work and actual follow-ups.

Open on alphaXiv

alphaXiv is searching for related work…

Reading the bibliography…

2014

Dressing L_mu - L_tau in Color

Altmannshofer, Wolfgang, Gori, Stefania, Pospelov, Maxim et al.

Understand

We consider a new massive vector-boson Z' that couples to leptons through the L_mu - L_tau current, and to quarks through an arbitrary set of couplings.

We show that such a model can be obtained from a renormalizable field theory involving new heavy fermions in an anomaly-free representation.
The model is a candidate explanation for the discrepancy observed recently by the LHCb collaboration in angular distributions of the final state particles in the rare decay B \to K* mu^+ mu^-.
Interestingly, the new vector-boson contribution to the decay tau \to mu nu_tau \bar nu_mu can also remove a small tension in the measurement of the corresponding branching ratio.

Built on

A. Datta, M. Duraisamy, and D. Ghosh, “Explaining the B → K ∗ μ + μ − B\to K^{\ast}\mu^{+}\mu^{-} anomaly with scalar interactions,” arXiv:1310.1937 [hep-ph]
Original
1937
Earlier work this paper cites.
R. Gauld, F. Goertz, and U. Haisch, “On minimal Z ′ Z^{\prime} explanations of the B → K ∗ μ + μ − B\to K^{*}\mu^{+}\mu^{-} anomaly,” Phys.Rev
Original
1959
Earlier work this paper cites.
R. Belusevic and J. Smith, “ W W - Z Z Interference in Neutrino - Nucleus Scattering,” Phys.Rev
1988
Earlier work this paper cites.
CHARM-II
1990
Earlier work this paper cites.
X. He, G. C. Joshi, H. Lew, and R. Volkas, “New Z ′ Z^{\prime} penomenology,” Phys.Rev
1991
Earlier work this paper cites.
X.-G. He, G. C. Joshi, H. Lew, and R. Volkas, “Simplest Z ′ Z^{\prime} model,” Phys.Rev
1991
Earlier work this paper cites.
S. Baek, N. Deshpande, X. He, and P. Ko, “Muon anomalous g − 2 g-2 and gauged L μ − L τ L_{\mu}-L_{\tau} models,” Phys.Rev
2001
Earlier work this paper cites.
E. Ma, D. Roy, and S. Roy, “Gauged L μ − L τ L_{\mu}-L_{\tau} with large muon anomalous magnetic moment and the bimaximal mixing of neutrinos,” Phys.Lett
2002
Earlier work this paper cites.
ALEPH, DELPHI, L3, OPAL, SLD, LEP Electroweak Working Group, SLD Electroweak Group, SLD Heavy Flavour Group
2006
Earlier work this paper cites.
T. Sjostrand, S. Mrenna, and P. Z. Skands, “PYTHIA 6.4 Physics and Manual,” JHEP
2006
Earlier work this paper cites.