Built on

P. Borel, R. Franceschini, R. Rattazzi, and A. Wulzer, “Probing the Scattering of Equivalent Electroweak Bosons”, JHEP
Original
1904
Earlier work this paper cites.
A. Alloul, N. D. Christensen, C. Degrande, C. Duhr, and B. Fuks, “FeynRules 2.0 - A complete toolbox for tree-level phenomenology”, arXiv:1310.1921 [ Inspire ]
Original
1921
Earlier work this paper cites.
R. Barbieri, A. E. Cárcamo Hernández, G. Corcella, R. Torre, and E. Trincherini, “Composite vectors at the Large Hadron Collider”, JHEP
Original
1942
Earlier work this paper cites.
V. Barger, W.-Y. Keung, and E. Ma, “Gauge model with light W and Z bosons”, Phys. Rev
1980
Earlier work this paper cites.
M. S. Chanowitz and M. K. Gaillard, “The TeV Physics of Strongly Interacting W’s and Z’s”, Nucl.Phys
1985
Earlier work this paper cites.
S. Dawson, “The effective W approximation”, Nucl. Phys
1985
Earlier work this paper cites.
J. L. Hewett and T. G. Rizzo, “Low-energy phenomenology of superstring-inspired E 6 E_{6} models”, Phys. Rept
1989
Earlier work this paper cites.
M. E. Peskin and T. Takeuchi, “Estimation of oblique electroweak corrections”, Phys. Rev
1992
Earlier work this paper cites.
M. S. Chanowitz and W. Kilgore, “Complementarity of Resonant and Nonresonant Strong W W WW Scattering at the LHC”, Phys. Lett
1993
Earlier work this paper cites.
M. Cvetic and S. Godfrey, “Discovery and Identification of Extra Gauge Bosons”, In *Barklow, T.L. (ed.) et al.: Electroweak symmetry breaking and new physics at the TeV scale*
1995
Earlier work this paper cites.
Z. Sullivan, “Fully differential W ′ {W}^{\prime} production and decay at next-to-leading order in QCD”, Phys. Rev
2002
Earlier work this paper cites.
R. Barbieri, A. Pomarol, R. Rattazzi, and A. Strumia, “Electroweak symmetry breaking after LEP1 and LEP2”, Nucl. Phys
2004
Earlier work this paper cites.
A. Belyaev, N. Christensen, and A. Pukhov, “CalcHEP - a package for calculation of Feynman diagrams and integration over multi-particle phase space”, Web page of the package (2005)
2005
Earlier work this paper cites.
G. Cacciapaglia, C. Csaki, G. Marandella, and A. Strumia, “The Minimal Set of Electroweak Precision Parameters”, Phys. Rev
2006
Earlier work this paper cites.
T. G. Rizzo, “The Determination of the Helicity of W ′ W^{\prime} Boson Couplings at the LHC”, JHEP
Original
2007
Earlier work this paper cites.
K. Agashe, H. Davoudiasl, S. Gopalakrishna, T. Han, G.-Y. Huang, G. Perez, Z.-G. Si, and A. Soni, “LHC Signals for Warped Electroweak Neutral Gauge Bosons”, Phys. Rev
Original
2007
Earlier work this paper cites.
G. F. Giudice, C. Grojean, A. Pomarol, and R. Rattazzi, “The Strongly-Interacting Light Higgs. ”, JHEP
2007
Earlier work this paper cites.
R. Barbieri, G. Isidori, V. S. Rychkov, and E. Trincherini, “Heavy Vectors in Higgs-less models”, Phys. Rev
Original
2008
Earlier work this paper cites.
P. Langacker, “The Physics of Heavy Z ′ {Z}^{\prime} Gauge Bosons”, Rev. Mod. Phys
Original
2009
Earlier work this paper cites.
E. Salvioni, G. Villadoro, and F. Zwirner, “Minimal Z’ models: present bounds and early LHC reach”, JHEP
Original
2009
Earlier work this paper cites.
K. Agashe, S. Gopalakrishna, T. Han, G.-Y. Huang, and A. Soni, “LHC signals for warped electroweak charged gauge bosons”, Phys. Rev
Original
2009
Earlier work this paper cites.
O. Catà, G. Isidori, and J. F. Kamenik, “Drell-Yan production of Heavy Vectors in Higgsless models”, Nucl. Phys
Original
2009
Earlier work this paper cites.
C. W. Bauer, Z. Ligeti, M. Schmaltz, J. Thaler, and D. G. E. Walker, “Supermodels for early LHC”, Phys. Lett
Original
2010
Earlier work this paper cites.
T. Han, I. Lewis, and Z. Liu, “Colored Resonant Signals at the LHC: Largest Rate and Simplest Topology”, JHEP
Original
2010
Earlier work this paper cites.

Similar

E. Salvioni, A. Strumia, G. Villadoro, and F. Zwirner, “Non-universal minimal Z’ models: present bounds and early LHC reach”, JHEP
Original
2010
Cited alongside, same era.
E. Salvioni, “Minimal Z ′ Z^{\prime} models and the early LHC”, Frascati Phys.Ser
Original
2010
Cited alongside, same era.
K. Agashe, A. Azatov, T. Han, Y. Li, Z.-G. Si, and L. Zhu, “LHC Signals for Coset Electroweak Gauge Bosons in Warped/Composite PGB Higgs Models”, Phys. Rev
Original
2010
Cited alongside, same era.
R. Barbieri, V. S. Rychkov, and R. Torre, “Signals of composite electroweak-neutral Dark Matter: LHC/Direct Detection interplay”, Phys. Lett
Original
2010
Cited alongside, same era.
A. E. Cárcamo Hernández and R. Torre, “A ‘composite’ scalar-vector system at the LHC”, Nucl. Phys

Then

E. Accomando, A. S. Belyaev, L. Fedeli, S. F. King, and C. H. Shepherd-Themistocleous, “ Z ′ Z^{\prime} physics with early LHC data”, Phys. Rev
Original
2012
Later among the works it cites.
C.-W. Chiang, N. D. Christensen, G.-J. Ding, and T. Han, “Discovery in Drell-Yan Processes at the LHC”, Phys. Rev
Original
2012
Later among the works it cites.
E. Salvioni, “Some Z-prime and W-prime models facing current LHC searches”, 20th International Workshop on Deep-Inelastic Scattering and Related Subjects (DIS 2012) Proceeding
2012
Later among the works it cites.
B. Bellazzini, C. Csaki, J. Hubisz, J. Serra, and J. Terning, “Composite Higgs Sketch”, JHEP
Original
2012
Later among the works it cites.
E. Accomando, L. Fedeli, S. Moretti, S. D. Curtis, and D. Dominici, “Charged di-boson production at the LHC in a 4-site model with a composite Higgs boson”, Phys.Rev

Beyond the bibliography

alphaXiv searches the wider corpus for related work and actual follow-ups.

Open on alphaXiv

alphaXiv is searching for related work…

Reading the bibliography…

2014

Heavy Vector Triplets: Bridging Theory and Data

Pappadopulo, Duccio, Thamm, Andrea, Torre, Riccardo et al.

Understand

We introduce a model-independent strategy to study narrow resonances which we apply to a heavy vector triplet of the Standard Model (SM) group for illustration.

The method is based on a simplified phenomenological Lagrangian which reproduces a large class of explicit models.
Firstly, this allows us to derive robust model-independent phenomenological features and, conversely, to identify the peculiarities of different explicit realizations.
Secondly, limits on cross-section times BR can be converted into bounds on a few relevant parameters in a fully analytic way, allowing for an interpretation in any given explicit model.