Fetching the paper…
Reading the bibliography…
We show that at sufficiently large chemical potential SU(N) lattice gauge theories in the strong coupling limit with staggered fermions are in a chirally symmetric phase.
M. Fromm and P. de Forcrand, PoS LAT2008, 191 (2008) [arXiv:0811.1931]
1931
Earlier work this paper cites.
G. Münster, Nucl. Phys. B 180
1981
Earlier work this paper cites.
C. Cammarota, Comm. Math. Phys. 85, 517 (1982)
1982
Earlier work this paper cites.
J-M Blairon, R. Brout, F. Englert and J. Greensite, Nucl. Phys. B 180
1983
Earlier work this paper cites.
E. T. Tomboulis and L. G. Yaffe, Comm. Math. Phys. 100, 313 (1985); Phys. Rev. Lett. 52
1984
Earlier work this paper cites.
D. C. Brydges, in Critical Phenomena, Random Systems and Gauge Theories
1986
Earlier work this paper cites.
E. Daggoto, A. Moreo and U. Wolff, Phys. Lett. B 186, 395 (1987)
1987
Earlier work this paper cites.
F. Karsch and K. H. Mütter, Nucl. Phys. B 313
1989
Cited alongside, same era.
J. U. Klaetke and K. H. Mütter, Nucl. Phys. B 342
1990
Cited alongside, same era.
One may note in this connection that in the formal continuum theory topological obstructions may arise in attaining the Polyakov gauge: C. Ford, T. Tok, A. Wipf, Phys. Lett. B 456, 155 (1999); E. Langmann, M. Salmhofer, A. Kovner, Mod. Phys. Lett. A9, 2913 (1994). The resulting singularities define the location of singular strings, monopoles, etc. Such singularities cannot, of course, appear in the lattice-regularized theory
1994
Cited alongside, same era.
D. H. Adams and S. Chandrasekharan, Nucl. Phys. B 662
2003
Cited alongside, same era.
Y. Nishida, K. Fukushima and T. Hatsuda, Phys. Rept. 398
2004
Cited alongside, same era.
S. Chandrasekharan and F-J. Jiang, Phys. Rev. D 74
2006
Later among the works it cites.
N. Kawamoto, K. Miura, A. Ohnishi and T. Ohmura, Phys. Rev. D 75
2007
Later among the works it cites.
P. de Forcrand PoS LAT2009, 010 (2009) [arXiv:1005.0539]
2009
Later among the works it cites.
K. Fukushima and T. Hatsuda, Rep. Prog. Phys. 74, 014001 (2011) [arXiv:1005.4814 [hep-lat]]
2011
Later among the works it cites.
Ph. de Forcrand, S. Kim and W. Unger, JHEP 02(2013)051 [arXiv:1208.2148]
2013
Closest in time.
alphaXiv searches the wider corpus for related work and actual follow-ups.
alphaXiv is searching for related work…
Y. Nishida, Phys. Rev. D 69
2004
Cited alongside, same era.
Reflection positivity in timelike planes, which was invoked in the convergence proof of the type of cluster expansion used in [ 12 ] , no longer holds in the presence of nonvanishing chemical potential
Cited in the paper.
Whatever (non)convergence properties this 1 / d 1/d expansion may have at physical values of d d , its truncation to leading terms mimics the corresponding truncation in the expansion considered in this paper
Cited in the paper.
More generally, the global symmetry is G × G G\times G where G G is the subgroup of U ( N f ) U(N_{f}) which commutes with all the matrices { γ [ b ] } \{\gamma[b]\} . For staggered fermions G = U ( N f ) G=U(N_{f})
Cited in the paper.
On a more technical note, we do not employ any sort of “improved” staggered fermion actions. Indeed, such “improvements” are only designed to assist approach to the continuum limit. They are not suited for our application at strong coupling, finite lattice spacing, where they are generally known to lead to unphysical effects such as spurious phases and other artifacts due to explicit violation of reflection positivity and other undesirable features
Cited in the paper.
Thus, with parametrization U = exp ( i 𝝎 ⋅ 𝐡 ) U=\exp(i\mbox{\boldmath$\omega$}\cdot{\bf h}) , where 𝐡 = ( h 1 , … , h N − 1 ) {\bf h}=(h_{1},\ldots,h_{N-1}) are the S U ( N ) SU(N) Cartan subalgebra generators, one may set θ i = 𝝎 ⋅ 𝐦 i \theta_{i}=\mbox{\boldmath$\omega$}\cdot{\bf m}_{i} , where 𝐦 i {\bf m}_{i} are the fundamental representation root vectors
Cited in the paper.
Indeed, each connected component of a given set B B may give rise to more than one distinct connected diagram from distinct Wick theorem contractions embodied in the integrations over d μ 𝐱 d\mu_{\bf x} . Different connected components of a given set B B give of course rise to disjoint connected diagrams
Cited in the paper.
2013
Closest in time.