Fetching the paper…
Reading the bibliography…
Arguably, the most popular candidate for Dark Matter (DM) is a massive, stable, Majorana fermion.
H. Goldberg, “Constraint on the photino mass from cosmology,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 50
1983
Earlier work this paper cites.
Y. Takahashi, “The Fierz Identities”, in Progress in Quantum Field Theory
1986
Earlier work this paper cites.
L. Bergstrom, “Radiative Processes in Dark Matter Photino Annihilation,” Phys. Lett. B 225
1989
Earlier work this paper cites.
R. Flores, K. A. Olive and S. Rudaz, “Radiative Processes in LSP Annihilation,” Phys. Lett. B 232
1989
Earlier work this paper cites.
P. Gondolo and G. Gelmini, “Cosmic abundances of stable particles: Improved analysis,” Nucl. Phys. B 360
1991
Earlier work this paper cites.
Massive three body final states were considered in X. l. Chen and M. Kamionkowski, “Three body annihilation of neutralinos below two-body thresholds,” JHEP 9807
1998
Earlier work this paper cites.
V. Berezinsky, M. Kachelriess and S. Ostapchenko, “Electroweak jet cascading in the decay of superheavy particles,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 89
2002
Earlier work this paper cites.
E. A. Baltz and L. Bergstrom, “Detection of leptonic dark matter,” Phys. Rev. D 67
2003
Earlier work this paper cites.
F. Donato, N. Fornengo, D. Maurin, P. Salati, “Antiprotons in cosmic rays from neutralino annihilation,” Phys. Rev. D69
2004
Earlier work this paper cites.
C. C. Nishi, “Simple derivation of general Fierz-like identities,” Am. J. Phys. 73
2005
Earlier work this paper cites.
2007
Earlier work this paper cites.
2008
Cited alongside, same era.
2008
Cited alongside, same era.
2008
Cited alongside, same era.
2008
Cited alongside, same era.
O. Adriani et al · 2010
Later among the works it cites.
A. A. Abdo et al · 2010
Later among the works it cites.
2011
Later among the works it cites.
2011
Later among the works it cites.
alphaXiv searches the wider corpus for related work and actual follow-ups.
alphaXiv is searching for related work…
2008
Cited alongside, same era.
2009
Cited alongside, same era.
2009
Cited alongside, same era.
2009
Cited alongside, same era.
2010
Cited alongside, same era.
O. Adriani et al · 2010
Cited alongside, same era.
The Möller velocity is the generalization of the relative velocity (as seen from either initial particle’s rest frame) that makes the time-integrated rate a relativistic invariant number. Explicitly, the Möller velocity v M = { ( v → 1 − v → 2 ) 2 − ( v → 1 × v → 2 ) 2 } 1 2 = { ( v 1 − v 2 ) 2 + v 1 v 2 ( 1 − cos θ 12 ) 2 } 1 2 {\rm v_{\rm M}}=\{({\vec{\rm v}}_{1}-{\vec{\rm v}}_{2})^{2}-({\vec{\rm v}}_{1}\times{\vec{\rm v}}_{2})^{2}\}^{\frac{1}{2}}=\{({\rm v}_{1}-{\rm v}_{2})^{2}+{\rm v}_{1}{\rm v}_{2}(1-\cos\theta_{12})^{2}\}^{\frac{1}{2}} where the initial particle velocities are defined in any frame. (The invariant is 2 E 1 E 2 v M = λ ( s , M 1 2 , M 2 2 ) 2E_{1}E_{2}{\rm v}_{\rm M}=\sqrt{\lambda(s,M_{1}^{2},M_{2}^{2})} , where λ \lambda is the triangle function.) Although defined in terms of physical velocities, the Möller velocity is not itself a physical velocity; in fact, it can exceed unity. Commonly used limits result (i) in the rest frame of one initial particle, say v 2 = 0 {\rm v}_{2}=0 , where v M = v 1 = v rel {\rm v_{\rm M}}={\rm v}_{1}={\rm v}_{\rm rel} , as it must; and (ii) when both initial particles are relativistic, where v M = 1 − cos θ 12 {\rm v_{\rm M}}=1-\cos\theta_{12} . An informative discussion and derivation of v M {\rm v}_{\rm M} is given in [ 6 ] , and nuances of thermal averaging with v M {\rm v}_{\rm M} are given in [ 7 ]
Cited in the paper.
L.D. Landau and E.M. Lifschitz, “The Classical Theory of Fields”, Pergamon Press, 4 t h 4^{th} revised Enlish edition, pages 32-34
Cited in the paper.
2011
Later among the works it cites.
2011
Later among the works it cites.
2011
Later among the works it cites.
2011
Later among the works it cites.
2011
Later among the works it cites.