Fetching the paper…
Reading the bibliography…
The potential between a heavy quark and an anti-quark inside the quark-gluon plasma (QGP) is studied on the basis of the gauge/gravity duality.
T. Hashimoto, O. Miyamura, K. Hirose and T. Kanki, Phys. Rev. Lett. 57
1986
Earlier work this paper cites.
J. M. Maldacena, Adv. Theor. Math. Phys. 2
1998
Earlier work this paper cites.
J. M. Maldacena, Phys. Rev. Lett. 80
1998
Earlier work this paper cites.
S. J. Rey, S. Theisen and J. T. Yee, Nucl. Phys. B 527
1998
Earlier work this paper cites.
N. Drukker, D. J. Gross and H. Ooguri, Phys. Rev. D 60
1999
Earlier work this paper cites.
C. P. Herzog and D. T. Son, JHEP 0303
2003
Earlier work this paper cites.
P. K. Kovtun, D. T. Son and A. O. Starinets, Phys. Rev. Lett. 94
2005
Earlier work this paper cites.
Reviewed in H. Satz, J. Phys. G 32
2006
Cited alongside, same era.
D. Bak, A. Karch and L. G. Yaffe, JHEP 0708
2007
Cited alongside, same era.
2008
Cited alongside, same era.
J. L. Albacete, Y. V. Kovchegov and A. Taliotis, Phys. Rev. D 78
2009
Cited alongside, same era.
Reviewed in S. Sarkar, H. Satz and B. Sinha, Lect. Notes Phys. 785
2010
Cited alongside, same era.
P. Gubler, K. Morita and M. Oka, Phys. Rev. Lett. 107
2011
Cited alongside, same era.
M. Asakawa and T. Hatsuda, Phys. Rev. Lett. 92
2012
Closest in time.
A. Rothkopf, T. Hatsuda and S. Sasaki, PoS LAT 2009
2012
Closest in time.
C. Young and K. Dusling, arXiv:1001.0935 [nucl-th]; Y. Akamatsu and A. Rothkopf, Phys. Rev. D 85
2012
Closest in time.
Y. Burnier, M. Laine and M. Vepsäläinen, JHEP 1001
2012
Closest in time.
See e.g., Y. Maezawa et al
2012
Closest in time.
See e.g., P. Petreczky, C. Miao and A. Mocsy, Nucl. Phys. A 855
2012
Closest in time.
alphaXiv searches the wider corpus for related work and actual follow-ups.
alphaXiv is searching for related work…
For recent quarkonia results at RHIC and LHC, A. Adare et al
2012
Cited alongside, same era.
K. Nawa, T. Hayata and T. Hatsuda, in preparation
Cited in the paper.
For configuration I, there exist two real solutions, a local minimum (maximum) of S NG S_{\mathrm{NG}} . For large π T τ \pi T\tau , they undergo a pair annihilation and the real solution disappears. However, such an annihilation happens only after the configuration II takes over the configuration I. As for the configuration III, the real solution does not appear for π T τ < π − 1 \pi T\tau<\pi-1 . Furthermore, the configurations II and III take the same S NG S_{\mathrm{NG}} at π T τ = π − 1 \pi T\tau=\pi-1
Cited in the paper.
Similar situation has also been found in the weak-coupling perturbation, Eq.(3.10) of Ref. [ 9 ] : V ( t , r ) V(t,r) behaves as i / t i/t for t ≪ r t\ll r , while it is highly suppressed as i r 2 / t 3 ir^{2}/t^{3} for t ≫ r t\gg r
Cited in the paper.
By generalizing the box ansatz near the cusp, the potential from the cusp can be suppressed already at t ∼ 0.5 ( π T ) − 1 t\sim 0.5(\pi T)^{-1} . This is because the bottom of the world sheet touches the event horizon at τ ∼ 0.5 ( π T ) − 1 \tau\sim 0.5(\pi T)^{-1} and r ∼ 0.5 ( π T ) − 1 r\sim 0.5(\pi T)^{-1} . Such suppression is expected to occur for even smaller t t in the exact configuration for which the world sheet tends to hang deeper
Cited in the paper.
If we identify r dis r_{\rm dis} with the typical Q Q - Q ¯ \bar{Q} distances in the heavy quarkonia, we find the dissociation temperature T dis = 390 T_{\rm dis}=390 , 220 220 and 190 190 MeV for Υ \Upsilon ( 1 1 S), J / Ψ J/\Psi and Υ \Upsilon ( 2 2 S), respectively
Cited in the paper.