Fetching the paper…
Reading the bibliography…
One-time programs are modelled after a black box that allows a single evaluation of a function, and then self-destructs.
Integrating the Data Encryption Standard into computer networks
Miles E. Smid · 1981
Earlier work this paper cites.
A single quantum cannot be cloned
William K. Wootters and Wojciech H. Zurek · 1982
Earlier work this paper cites.
Conjugate coding
Stephen Wiesner · 1983
Earlier work this paper cites.
Quantum cryptography: Public key distribution and coin tossing
Charles H. Bennett and Gilles Brassard · 1984
Earlier work this paper cites.
Programmable quantum gate arrays
Michael A. Nielsen and Isaac L. Chuang · 1997
Earlier work this paper cites.
Demonstrating the viability of universal quantum computation using teleportation and single-qubit operations
Daniel Gottesman and Issac Chuang · 1999
Earlier work this paper cites.
On universal and fault-tolerant quantum computing
P. Oscar Boykin, Tal Mor, Matthew Pulver, Vwani Roychowdhury, and Farrokh Vatan · 2000
Earlier work this paper cites.
Simple proof of security of the BB84 quantum key distribution protocol
Peter Shor and John Preskill · 2000
Earlier work this paper cites.
On the (im)possibility of obfuscating programs
Boaz Barak, Oded Goldreich, Russell Impagliazzo, Steven Rudich, Amit Sahai, Salil Vadhan, and Ke Yang · 2001
Earlier work this paper cites.
Universally composable security: a new paradigm for cryptographic protocols
Ran Canetti · 2001
Earlier work this paper cites.
A model for asynchronous reactive systems and its application to secure message transmission
Birgit Pfitzmann and Michael Waidner · 2001
Cited alongside, same era.
Authentication of quantum messages
Howard Barnum, Claude Crépeau, Daniel Gottesman, Adam Smith, and Alain Tapp · 2002
Cited alongside, same era.
General security definition and composability for quantum & classical protocols
Michael Ben Or and Dominic Mayers · 2004
Cited alongside, same era.
Simulatable security for quantum protocols
Dominique Unruh · 2004
Cited alongside, same era.
Secure multiparty quantum computation with (only) a strict honest majority
Michael Ben-Or, Claude Crépeau, Daniel Gottesman, Avinatan Hassidim, and Adam Smith · 2006
Cited alongside, same era.
The Solovay–Kitaev algorithm
Christopher Dawson and Michael Nielsen · 2006
Exact and approximate unitary 2-designs and their application to fidelity estimation
Christoph Dankert, Richard Cleve, Joseph Emerson, and Etera Livine · 2009
Later among the works it cites.
Interactive proofs for quantum computations
Dorit Aharonov, Michael Ben-Or, and Elad Eban · 2010
Later among the works it cites.
Efficient universal quantum circuits
Debajyoti Bera, Stephen Fenner, Frederic Green, and Steve Homer · 2010
Later among the works it cites.
Founding cryptography on tamper-proof hardware tokens
Vipul Goyal, Yuval Ishai, Amit Sahai, Ramarathnam Venkatesan, and Akshay Wadia · 2010
Later among the works it cites.
Michele Mosca and Douglas Stebila · 2010
Later among the works it cites.
alphaXiv searches the wider corpus for related work and actual follow-ups.
alphaXiv is searching for related work…
Cited alongside, same era.
Universal quantum circuit for
Paulo Benício de Sousa and Rubens Viana Ramos · 2007
Cited alongside, same era.
One-time programs
Shafi Goldwasser, Yael Kalai, and Guy Rothblum · 2008
Cited alongside, same era.
Quantum copy-protection and quantum money
Scott Aaronson · 2009
Cited alongside, same era.
Universal blind quantum computation
Anne Broadbent, Joseph Fitzsimons, and Elham Kashefi · 2009
Cited alongside, same era.
Universally composable quantum multi-party computation
Dominique Unruh · 2010
Later among the works it cites.
Quantum money from hidden subspaces
Scott Aaronson and Paul Christiano · 2012
Closest in time.
Complete insecurity of quantum protocols for classical two-party computation
Harry Buhrman, Matthias Christandl, and Christian Schaffner · 2012
Closest in time.
Actively secure two-party evaluation of any quantum operation
Frédéric Dupuis, Jesper Buus Nielsen, and Louis Salvail · 2012
Closest in time.