Built on

P. Zhang, M. Liguori, R. Bean, and S. Dodelson, “Probing Gravity at Cosmological Scales by Measurements which Test the Relationship between Gravitational Lensing and Matter Overdensity,” Phys.Rev.Lett
Original
1932
Earlier work this paper cites.
G. W. Horndeski, “Second-order scalar-tensor field equations in a four-dimensional space,” Int.J.Th.Phys
1974
Earlier work this paper cites.
N. Kaiser, “Clustering in real space and in redshift space,” Mon.Not.Roy.Astron.Soc
1987
Earlier work this paper cites.
D. Huterer and G. Starkman, “Parameterization of dark-energy properties: A Principal-component approach,” Phys.Rev.Lett
2003
Earlier work this paper cites.
T. Chiba, “ 1 / R 1/R gravity and scalar-tensor gravity,” Phys.Lett
2003
Earlier work this paper cites.
Academic Press, 2003
S. Dodelson, Modern Cosmology · 2003
Earlier work this paper cites.
R. R. Caldwell and M. Doran, “Dark-energy evolution across the cosmological-constant boundary,” Phys.Rev
2005
Earlier work this paper cites.
E. V. Linder, “Cosmic growth history and expansion history,” Phys.Rev
2005
Earlier work this paper cites.
E. Bertschinger, “On the Growth of Perturbations as a Test of Dark Energy,” Astrophys.J
2006
Earlier work this paper cites.
W. Hu and I. Sawicki, “A Parameterized Post-Friedmann Framework for Modified Gravity,” Phys.Rev
Original
2007
Earlier work this paper cites.
R. P. Woodard, “Avoiding dark energy with 1 / R 1/R modifications of gravity,” Lect.Notes Phys
2007
Earlier work this paper cites.

Similar

L. Amendola, M. Kunz, and D. Sapone, “Measuring the dark side (with weak lensing),” JCAP
Original
2008
Cited alongside, same era.
M. Kunz, “The dark degeneracy: On the number and nature of dark components,” Phys.Rev
2009
Cited alongside, same era.
W. J. Percival and M. White, “Testing cosmological structure formation using redshift-space distortions,” Mon.Not.Roy.Astron.Soc
Original
2009
Cited alongside, same era.
Cambridge University Press, 2010
L. Amendola and S. Tsujikawa, Dark Energy: Theory and Observations · 2010
Cited alongside, same era.
A. Shafieloo and C. Clarkson, “Model independent tests of the standard cosmological model,” Phys.Rev
Original
2010
Cited alongside, same era.

Then

A. De Felice, T. Kobayashi, and S. Tsujikawa, “Effective gravitational couplings for cosmological perturbations in the most general scalar-tensor theories with second-order field equations,” Phys.Lett
Original
2011
Later among the works it cites.
C. Deffayet, X. Gao, D. Steer, and G. Zahariade, “From k-essence to generalised Galileons,” Phys.Rev
Original
2011
Later among the works it cites.
T. Kobayashi, M. Yamaguchi, and J. Yokoyama, “Generalized G-inflation: Inflation with the most general second-order field equations,” Prog.Theor.Phys
Original
2011
Later among the works it cites.
T. Clifton, P. G. Ferreira, A. Padilla, and C. Skordis, “Modified Gravity and Cosmology,” Phys.Rept
Original
2012
Closest in time.
M. Kunz, “The phenomenological approach to modeling the dark energy,” Comptes Rendus Physique

Beyond the bibliography

alphaXiv searches the wider corpus for related work and actual follow-ups.

Open on alphaXiv

alphaXiv is searching for related work…

Reading the bibliography…

2012

Observables and unobservables in dark energy cosmologies

Amendola, Luca, Kunz, Martin, Motta, Mariele et al.

Understand

The aim of this paper is to answer the following two questions: (1) Given cosmological observations of the expansion history and linear perturbations in a range of redshifts and scales as precise as is required, which of the properties of dark energy could actually be reconstructed without imposing any parameterization? (2) Are these observables sufficient to rule out not just a particular dark energy model, but the entire general class of viable models comprising a single scalar field? This paper bears both good and bad news.

On one hand, we find that the goal of reconstructing dark energy models is fundamentally limited by the unobservability of the present values of the matter density Omega_m0, the perturbation normalization sigma_8 as well as the present matter power spectrum.
On the other, we find that, under certain conditions, cosmological observations can nonetheless rule out the entire class of the most general single scalar-field models, i.e.
those based on the Horndeski Lagrangian.

Built on

P. Zhang, M. Liguori, R. Bean, and S. Dodelson, “Probing Gravity at Cosmological Scales by Measurements which Test the Relationship between Gravitational Lensing and Matter Overdensity,” Phys.Rev.Lett
Original
1932
Earlier work this paper cites.
G. W. Horndeski, “Second-order scalar-tensor field equations in a four-dimensional space,” Int.J.Th.Phys
1974
Earlier work this paper cites.
N. Kaiser, “Clustering in real space and in redshift space,” Mon.Not.Roy.Astron.Soc
1987
Earlier work this paper cites.
D. Huterer and G. Starkman, “Parameterization of dark-energy properties: A Principal-component approach,” Phys.Rev.Lett
2003
Earlier work this paper cites.
T. Chiba, “ 1 / R 1/R gravity and scalar-tensor gravity,” Phys.Lett
2003
Earlier work this paper cites.
Academic Press, 2003
S. Dodelson, Modern Cosmology · 2003
Earlier work this paper cites.
R. R. Caldwell and M. Doran, “Dark-energy evolution across the cosmological-constant boundary,” Phys.Rev
2005
Earlier work this paper cites.
E. V. Linder, “Cosmic growth history and expansion history,” Phys.Rev
2005
Earlier work this paper cites.
E. Bertschinger, “On the Growth of Perturbations as a Test of Dark Energy,” Astrophys.J
2006
Earlier work this paper cites.
W. Hu and I. Sawicki, “A Parameterized Post-Friedmann Framework for Modified Gravity,” Phys.Rev
Original
2007
Earlier work this paper cites.
R. P. Woodard, “Avoiding dark energy with 1 / R 1/R modifications of gravity,” Lect.Notes Phys
2007
Earlier work this paper cites.