Built on

S. S. Gubser and A. Nellore, “Ground states of holographic superconductors,” Phys. Rev. D 80
Original
1972
Earlier work this paper cites.
E. Witten, “Anti-de Sitter space, thermal phase transition, and confinement in gauge theories,” Adv. Theor. Math. Phys. 2
1998
Earlier work this paper cites.
J. M. Maldacena, “Wilson loops in large N field theories,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 80
1998
Earlier work this paper cites.
J. M. Maldacena, “The Large N limit of superconformal field theories and supergravity,” Adv. Theor. Math. Phys. 2
1999
Earlier work this paper cites.
A. Chamblin, R. Emparan, C. V. Johnson and R. C. Myers, “Charged AdS black holes and catastrophic holography,” Phys. Rev. D 60
1999
Earlier work this paper cites.
M. Cvetic and S. S. Gubser, “Phases of R charged black holes, spinning branes and strongly coupled gauge theories,” JHEP 9904
1999
Earlier work this paper cites.
R. C. Myers, “Dielectric branes,” JHEP 9912
1999
Earlier work this paper cites.
S. S. Gubser, “Curvature singularities: The Good, the bad, and the naked,” Adv. Theor. Math. Phys. 4
2000
Earlier work this paper cites.
S. -J. Rey and J. -T. Yee, “Macroscopic strings as heavy quarks in large N gauge theory and anti-de Sitter supergravity,” Eur. Phys. J. C 22
2001
Earlier work this paper cites.
T. Senthil, Subir Sachdev, Matthias Vojta, “Fractionalized Fermi liquids,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 90
2003
Earlier work this paper cites.
O. Aharony, J. Marsano, S. Minwalla, K. Papadodimas and M. Van Raamsdonk, “The Hagedorn - deconfinement phase transition in weakly coupled large N gauge theories,” Adv. Theor. Math. Phys. 8
2004
Earlier work this paper cites.

Similar

S. Ryu and T. Takayanagi, “Holographic derivation of entanglement entropy from AdS/CFT,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 96
2006
Cited alongside, same era.
T. Nishioka and T. Takayanagi, “AdS Bubbles, Entropy and Closed String Tachyons,” JHEP 0701
2007
Cited alongside, same era.
I. R. Klebanov, D. Kutasov and A. Murugan, “Entanglement as a probe of confinement,” Nucl. Phys. B 796
Original
2008
Cited alongside, same era.
T. J. Hollowood, S. P. Kumar, A. Naqvi and P. Wild, “N=4 SYM on S**3 with Near Critical Chemical Potentials,” JHEP 0808
Original
2008
Cited alongside, same era.
T. Nishioka, S. Ryu and T. Takayanagi, “Holographic Entanglement Entropy: An Overview,” J. Phys. A A 42
Original
2009
Cited alongside, same era.

Then

G. T. Horowitz and B. Way, “Complete Phase Diagrams for a Holographic Superconductor/Insulator System,” JHEP 1011
Original
2010
Later among the works it cites.
L. Huijse and S. Sachdev, “Fermi surfaces and gauge-gravity duality,” Phys. Rev. D 84
Original
2011
Later among the works it cites.
S. A. Hartnoll, D. M. Hofman and D. Vegh, “Stellar spectroscopy: Fermions and holographic Lifshitz criticality,” JHEP 1108
Original
2011
Later among the works it cites.
S. Sachdev, “A model of a Fermi liquid using gauge-gravity duality,” Phys. Rev. D 84
Original
2011
Later among the works it cites.
B. Gouteraux and E. Kiritsis, “Generalized Holographic Quantum Criticality at Finite Density,” JHEP 1112

Beyond the bibliography

alphaXiv searches the wider corpus for related work and actual follow-ups.

Open on alphaXiv

alphaXiv is searching for related work…

Reading the bibliography…

2012

Holographic order parameter for charge fractionalization

Hartnoll, Sean A., Radicevic, Djordje

Understand

Nonlocal order parameters for deconfinement, such as the entanglement entropy and Wilson loops, depend on spatial surfaces \Sigma.

These observables are given holographically by the area of a certain bulk spatial surface \Gamma, ending on \Sigma.
At finite charge density it is natural to consider the electric flux through the bulk surface \Gamma, in addition to its area.
We show that this flux provides a refined order parameter that can distinguish `fractionalized' phases, with charged horizons, from what we term `cohesive' phases, with charged matter in the bulk.

Built on

S. S. Gubser and A. Nellore, “Ground states of holographic superconductors,” Phys. Rev. D 80
Original
1972
Earlier work this paper cites.
E. Witten, “Anti-de Sitter space, thermal phase transition, and confinement in gauge theories,” Adv. Theor. Math. Phys. 2
1998
Earlier work this paper cites.
J. M. Maldacena, “Wilson loops in large N field theories,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 80
1998
Earlier work this paper cites.
J. M. Maldacena, “The Large N limit of superconformal field theories and supergravity,” Adv. Theor. Math. Phys. 2
1999
Earlier work this paper cites.
A. Chamblin, R. Emparan, C. V. Johnson and R. C. Myers, “Charged AdS black holes and catastrophic holography,” Phys. Rev. D 60
1999
Earlier work this paper cites.
M. Cvetic and S. S. Gubser, “Phases of R charged black holes, spinning branes and strongly coupled gauge theories,” JHEP 9904
1999
Earlier work this paper cites.
R. C. Myers, “Dielectric branes,” JHEP 9912
1999
Earlier work this paper cites.
S. S. Gubser, “Curvature singularities: The Good, the bad, and the naked,” Adv. Theor. Math. Phys. 4
2000
Earlier work this paper cites.
S. -J. Rey and J. -T. Yee, “Macroscopic strings as heavy quarks in large N gauge theory and anti-de Sitter supergravity,” Eur. Phys. J. C 22
2001
Earlier work this paper cites.
T. Senthil, Subir Sachdev, Matthias Vojta, “Fractionalized Fermi liquids,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 90
2003
Earlier work this paper cites.
O. Aharony, J. Marsano, S. Minwalla, K. Papadodimas and M. Van Raamsdonk, “The Hagedorn - deconfinement phase transition in weakly coupled large N gauge theories,” Adv. Theor. Math. Phys. 8
2004
Earlier work this paper cites.