Fetching the paper…
Reading the bibliography…
We revisit the photo-absorption sum rule for real Compton scattering from the proton and from nuclear targets.
W. Thomas, Naturwissenschaften 13
1925
Earlier work this paper cites.
W. Thomas, Z. Phys. 34
1925
Earlier work this paper cites.
W. Kuhn, Z. Phys. 33
1925
Earlier work this paper cites.
J. S. Levinger, Nuclear Photo-Disintegration, Oxford University Press, London, 1960
1960
Earlier work this paper cites.
M. Froissart, Phys. Rev. 123
1961
Earlier work this paper cites.
R. R. Harvey, J. T. Caldwell, R. L. Bramblett, and S. C. Fultz, Phys. Rev. 138
1964
Earlier work this paper cites.
D. Gross, H. Pagels, Phys. Rev. Lett. 20
1968
Earlier work this paper cites.
H. G. Dosch, D. Gordon, Nuovo Cimento 57A
1968
Earlier work this paper cites.
M. J. Creutz, S. D. Drell, E. A. Paschos, Phys. Rev. 178
1969
Earlier work this paper cites.
M. Damashek and F. J. Gilman, Phys. Rev. D 1
1970
Cited alongside, same era.
C. A. Dominguez, C. Ferro Fontan and R. Suaya, Phys. Lett. B 31
1970
Cited alongside, same era.
W. P. Hesse, D. O. Caldwell, V. B. Elings, R. J. Morrison, F. V. Murphy, B. W. Worster and D. E. Yount, Phys. Rev. Lett. 25
1970
Cited alongside, same era.
F. E. Close, J. F. Gunion, Phys. Rev. D4
1971
Cited alongside, same era.
I. Shibasaki, T. Minamikawa, T. Watanabe, Prog. Theor. Phys. 46
1971
Cited alongside, same era.
M. Kugler, M. Milgrom, Ann. Phys. 66
1971
Cited alongside, same era.
A. Zee, Phys. Rev. D5
C. A. Dominguez, C. Ferro Fontan and R. Suaya, Phys. Rev. D 6
1972
Later among the works it cites.
S. J. Brodsky, F. E. Close, J. F. Gunion, Phys. Rev. D8
1973
Later among the works it cites.
D. O. Caldwell, V. B. Elings, W. P. Hesse, R. J. Morrison, F. V. Murphy, and D. E. Yount, Phys. Rev. D 7
1973
Later among the works it cites.
B. L. Berman, S. C. Fultz, Rev. Mod. Phys. Vol. 47
1975
Later among the works it cites.
D. O. Caldwell et al
1979
Later among the works it cites.
N. Bianchi et al
1996
Later among the works it cites.
J. Breitweg et al
1999
Later among the works it cites.
alphaXiv searches the wider corpus for related work and actual follow-ups.
alphaXiv is searching for related work…
1972
Cited alongside, same era.
S. J. Brodsky, F. E. Close, J. F. Gunion, Phys. Rev. D5
1972
Cited alongside, same era.
N. R. S. Tait, J. N. J. White, Nucl. Phys. B 43
1972
Cited alongside, same era.
The difference between the notation α = 0 \alpha=0 pole and J = 0 J=0 pole, more commonly used in the literature, is a subtle one. J J refers to the spin of an exchanged particle, whereas α \alpha refers to a parameter describing the high-energy behavior of a scattering amplitude, the intercept of a Regge trajectory. For mesonic trajectories, α = 0 , 1 , 2 , … \alpha=0,1,2,\dots corresponds to physical particles of integer spin J J . Instead, the J = 0 J=0 pole cannot be identified with such an exchange, therefore, we opt for the notation α = 0 \alpha=0 pole as more suitable
Cited in the paper.
S. J. Brodsky, F. J. Llanes-Estrada and A. P. Szczepaniak, Phys. Rev. D 79
2009
Later among the works it cites.
K. Nakamura et al. (Particle Data Group), J. Phys. G 37
2010
Later among the works it cites.