Built on

For a review of HQET and its application to f B s f_{B_{s}} see G. Buchalla, arXiv:hep-ph/0202092, in the Proceedings of the 55th Scottish Universities Summer School in Physics, edited by C. T. H. Davies and S. M. Playfer (Bristol, IOP, 2002)
2002
Earlier work this paper cites.
R. G. Edwards and B. Joo, Nucl. Phys. B Proc. Suppl. 140, 832 (2005)
2005
Earlier work this paper cites.
E. Follana et al
2007
Earlier work this paper cites.
E. Follana, C. T. H. Davies, G. P. Lepage and J. Shigemitsu [HPQCD Collaboration], Phys. Rev. Lett. 100
Original
2008
Earlier work this paper cites.
C. T. H. Davies et al
Original
2008
Earlier work this paper cites.
E. Gamiz et al
Original
2009
Earlier work this paper cites.

Similar

C. T. H. Davies et al
Original
2010
Cited alongside, same era.
E. B. Gregory et al
Original
2010
Cited alongside, same era.
C. McNeile, C. T. H. Davies, E. Follana, K. Hornbostel, G. P. Lepage [HPQCD Collaboration], Phys. Rev. D82
Original
2010
Cited alongside, same era.
C. T. H. Davies, C. McNeile, E. Follana, G. P. Lepage, H. Na, J. Shigemitsu [HPQCD Collaboration], Phys. Rev. D82
Original
2010
Cited alongside, same era.
H. Na, C. T. H. Davies, E. Follana, G. P. Lepage, J. Shigemitsu [HPQCD Collaboration], Phys. Rev. D82
Original
2010

Then

C. T. H. Davies, E. Follana, I. D. Kendall, G. P. Lepage and C. McNeile [HPQCD Collaboration], Phys. Rev. D 81
Original
2010
Later among the works it cites.
See talk by J. Shigemitsu (HPQCD) and poster by E. Neil (Fermilab/MILC) at Lattice 2011 (Squaw Valley, Ca., July 2011)
2011
Closest in time.
P. Dimopoulos, et al. [ETM Collaboration], arXiv:1107.1441 [hep-lat]. Two additional new results, both using effective field theories for the b b dynamics, were announced at Lattice 2011 : 0.226 ( 10 ) 0.226(10) GeV from the HPQCD collaboration and 0.242 ( 9 ) 0.242(9) GeV from the Fermilab/MILC collaboration (see [ 8 ] )
Original
2011
Closest in time.
E. B. Gregory, C. T. H. Davies, I. D. Kendall, J. Koponen, K. Wong, E. Follana, E. Gamiz, G. P. Lepage et al
Original
2011
Closest in time.
K. Nakamura et al. (Particle Data Group), Journal of Physics G37, 075021 (2010) and 2011 partial update for the 2012 edition

Beyond the bibliography

alphaXiv searches the wider corpus for related work and actual follow-ups.

Open on alphaXiv

alphaXiv is searching for related work…

Reading the bibliography…

2011

High-Precision $f_{B_s}$ and HQET from Relativistic Lattice QCD

McNeile, C., Davies, C. T. H., Follana, E. et al.

Understand

We present a new determination of the $B_s$ leptonic decay constant from lattice QCD simulations that use gluon configurations from MILC and a highly improved discretization of the relativistic quark action for both valence quarks.

Our result, $f_{B_s} = 0.225(4)$\,GeV, is almost three times more accurate than previous determinations.
We analyze the dependence of the decay constant on the heavy quark's mass and obtain the first empirical evidence for the leading $1/\sqrt{m_h}$ dependence predicted by Heavy Quark Effective Theory (HQET).
As a check, we use our analysis technique to calculate the $m_{B_s}-m_{\eta_b}/2$ mass difference.

Built on

For a review of HQET and its application to f B s f_{B_{s}} see G. Buchalla, arXiv:hep-ph/0202092, in the Proceedings of the 55th Scottish Universities Summer School in Physics, edited by C. T. H. Davies and S. M. Playfer (Bristol, IOP, 2002)
2002
Earlier work this paper cites.
R. G. Edwards and B. Joo, Nucl. Phys. B Proc. Suppl. 140, 832 (2005)
2005
Earlier work this paper cites.
E. Follana et al
2007
Earlier work this paper cites.
E. Follana, C. T. H. Davies, G. P. Lepage and J. Shigemitsu [HPQCD Collaboration], Phys. Rev. Lett. 100
Original
2008
Earlier work this paper cites.
C. T. H. Davies et al
Original
2008
Earlier work this paper cites.
E. Gamiz et al
Original
2009
Earlier work this paper cites.

Similar

C. T. H. Davies et al
Original
2010
Cited alongside, same era.
E. B. Gregory et al
Original
2010
Cited alongside, same era.
C. McNeile, C. T. H. Davies, E. Follana, K. Hornbostel, G. P. Lepage [HPQCD Collaboration], Phys. Rev. D82
Original
2010
Cited alongside, same era.
C. T. H. Davies, C. McNeile, E. Follana, G. P. Lepage, H. Na, J. Shigemitsu [HPQCD Collaboration], Phys. Rev. D82
Original
2010
Cited alongside, same era.
H. Na, C. T. H. Davies, E. Follana, G. P. Lepage, J. Shigemitsu [HPQCD Collaboration], Phys. Rev. D82
Original
2010

Then

C. T. H. Davies, E. Follana, I. D. Kendall, G. P. Lepage and C. McNeile [HPQCD Collaboration], Phys. Rev. D 81
Original
2010
Later among the works it cites.
See talk by J. Shigemitsu (HPQCD) and poster by E. Neil (Fermilab/MILC) at Lattice 2011 (Squaw Valley, Ca., July 2011)
2011
Closest in time.
P. Dimopoulos, et al. [ETM Collaboration], arXiv:1107.1441 [hep-lat]. Two additional new results, both using effective field theories for the b b dynamics, were announced at Lattice 2011 : 0.226 ( 10 ) 0.226(10) GeV from the HPQCD collaboration and 0.242 ( 9 ) 0.242(9) GeV from the Fermilab/MILC collaboration (see [ 8 ] )
Original
2011
Closest in time.
E. B. Gregory, C. T. H. Davies, I. D. Kendall, J. Koponen, K. Wong, E. Follana, E. Gamiz, G. P. Lepage et al
Original
2011
Closest in time.
K. Nakamura et al. (Particle Data Group), Journal of Physics G37, 075021 (2010) and 2011 partial update for the 2012 edition

Beyond the bibliography

alphaXiv searches the wider corpus for related work and actual follow-ups.

Open on alphaXiv

alphaXiv is searching for related work…

Cited alongside, same era.

A. Bazavov, D. Toussaint, C. Bernard, J. Laiho, C. DeTar, L. Levkova, M. B. Oktay, S. Gottlieb et al

Original

2010

Cited alongside, same era.

We include only the leading-order anomalous dimension because of the limited precision of our data. Our results are essentially unchanged if we omit leading-order as well

Cited in the paper.

Parameter c s c_{s} depends upon M H s M_{H_{s}} but we have verified that such variation has negligible impact on our analysis given our statistical errors. Our value for c s c_{s} agrees with the f D s f_{D_{s}} slope given in [ 6 ]

Cited in the paper.

Naively one expects c i j k l ≈ O ⁡ ( 1 ) c_{ijkl}\!\approx\!O(1) . Making the prior 50% wider is conservative and increases our final error estimates. The empirical Bayes criterion, for example, indicates that a prior of 0 ± 1 0\pm 1 is optimal. The empirical Bayes criterion is discussed in: G. P. Lepage et al. , Nucl. Phys. Proc. Suppl. 106

Cited in the paper.

Our value for slope d s d_{s} agrees reasonably well with the value 0.20(1) found for m D s m_{D_{s}} in [ 6 ]

Cited in the paper.

HPQCD collaboration, in preparation

Cited in the paper.

2012

Closest in time.