Fetching the paper…
Reading the bibliography…
We report the first reconstruction in hadron collisions of the suppressed decays B^- -> D(-> K^+ pi^-)K^- and B^- -> D(-> K^+ pi^-)pi^-, sensitive to the CKM phase gamma, using data from 7 fb^-1 of integrated luminosity collected by the CDF II detector at the Tevatron collider.
M. Kobayashi and T. Maskawa, Prog. Theor. Phys. 49(2)
1963
Earlier work this paper cites.
R. Brun, R. Hagelberg, M. Hansroul, and J. C. Lasalle, Reports no. CERN-DD-78-2-REV and CERN-DD-78-2 (1978)
1978
Earlier work this paper cites.
M. Gronau and D. Wyler, Phys. Lett. B265
1991
Earlier work this paper cites.
D. Atwood, I. Dunietz and A. Soni, Phys. Rev. D 63
1997
Earlier work this paper cites.
A. Sill, Nucl. Instrum. Methods A 447
2000
Earlier work this paper cites.
I. Dunietz, R. Fleischer and U. Nierste, Phys. Rev. D 63
2001
Earlier work this paper cites.
R. Fleischer, Phys. Lett. B459
2002
Earlier work this paper cites.
E. J. Thomson et al
2002
Cited alongside, same era.
A. Giri, Y. Grossman, A. Soffer, and J. Zupan, Phys. Rev. D 68
2003
Cited alongside, same era.
G. Punzi, in Proc. of the Conference on Statistical Problems in Particle Physics, Astrophysics and Cosmology (Phystat 2003), (SLAC, Menlo Park, CA, 2003), p. 79. edited by L. Lyons et al
2003
Cited alongside, same era.
A. Affolder et al
2004
Cited alongside, same era.
Y. Grossman, A. Soffer and J. Zupan, Phys. Rev. D 72
2005
Cited alongside, same era.
D. E. Acosta et al
2005
Cited alongside, same era.
D. E. Acosta et al
2005
T. Aaltonen et al
2010
Later among the works it cites.
K. Nakamura et al
2010
Later among the works it cites.
B. Ashmanskas et al
2010
Later among the works it cites.
P. del Amo Sanchez et al
2010
Later among the works it cites.
E. Barberio et al
2011
Closest in time.
Y. Horii et al
2011
Closest in time.
alphaXiv searches the wider corpus for related work and actual follow-ups.
alphaXiv is searching for related work…
Cited alongside, same era.
D D indicates D 0 D^{0} and D ¯ 0 \bar{D}^{0} , and the charge conjugate state is implied throughout the paper, except in formulas and sentences where both are mentioned explicitly
Cited in the paper.
r B r_{B} is defined as the magnitude of the amplitude ratio of the suppressed process b → u b\to u over the favored process b → c b\to c , r B = | ℳ ( b → u ) ℳ ( b → c ) | r_{B}=\left|\frac{\mathcal{M}(b\to u)}{\mathcal{M}(b\to c)}\right| . Since the suppressed transition is associated to the B − → D ¯ 0 K − B^{-}\to\bar{D}^{0}K^{-} decay and the favored to B − → D 0 K − B^{-}\to D^{0}K^{-} , r B r_{B} corresponds also to | ℳ ( B − → D ¯ 0 K − ) ℳ ( B − → D 0 K − ) | \left|\frac{\mathcal{M}(B^{-}\to\bar{D}^{0}K^{-})}{\mathcal{M}(B^{-}\to{D}^{0}K^{-})}\right| . In the text we will distinguish between r B r_{B} of the kaon, r B ( K ) r_{B}(K) , and of the pion, r B ( π ) r_{B}(\pi) . The definitions for the pion are analogous to the definitions for the kaon
Cited in the paper.
CDF II uses a cylindrical coordinate system in which ϕ \phi is the azimuthal angle, r r is the radius from the nominal beam line, and z z points in the proton-beam direction, with the origin at the center of the detector. The transverse plane is the plane perpendicular to the z z axis
Cited in the paper.
Isolation is defined as I B = p T ( B ) / ( p T ( B ) + ∑ i p T i ) I_{B}=p_{T}(B)/(p_{T}(B)+\sum_{i}p_{Ti}) , where p T ( B ) p_{T}(B) is the transverse momentum of the B B candidate, and the sum runs over all other tracks within a cone in the η − ϕ \eta-\phi space around the B B flight-direction. Its value is typically higher for bottom–flavored hadrons than for random track combinations
Cited in the paper.
The kaon probability is defined as κ = d E / d x 𝑚𝑒𝑎𝑠 − d E / d x 𝑒𝑥𝑝 ( π ) d E / d x 𝑒𝑥𝑝 ( K ) − d E / d x 𝑒𝑥𝑝 ( π ) \kappa=\frac{dE/dx_{\it meas}-dE/dx_{\it exp}(\pi)}{dE/dx_{\it exp}(K)-dE/dx_{\it exp}(\pi)} , where d E / d x 𝑚𝑒𝑎𝑠 dE/dx_{\it meas} is the measured specific energy loss of the track and d E / d x 𝑒𝑥𝑝 dE/dx_{\it exp} is the expected energy loss; κ \kappa has an average value of 1 for kaons and 0 for pions
Cited in the paper.