Fetching the paper…
Reading the bibliography…
In Kaluza-Klein models with an arbitrary number of toroidal internal spaces, we investigate soliton solutions which describe the gravitational field of a massive compact object.
D. Kramer, Acta Phys. Polon. B 2
1970
Earlier work this paper cites.
C. M. Will, Theory and Experiment in Gravitational Physics
1981
Earlier work this paper cites.
D. J. Gross and M. J. Perry, Nucl. Phys. B 226
1983
Earlier work this paper cites.
N. Straumann, General Relativity and Relativistic Astrophysics
1984
Earlier work this paper cites.
A. Davidson and D. Owen, Phys. Lett. 155
1985
Earlier work this paper cites.
S. B. Fadeev, V.D. Ivashchuk, and V.N. Melnikov, Phys. Lett. A 161
1991
Earlier work this paper cites.
M. Cavagli a ` \grave{\mbox{a}} , Phys. Lett. B 413
1997
Earlier work this paper cites.
B. Bertotti, L. Iess, and P. Tortora, Nature 425
2003
Cited alongside, same era.
C. M. Will, Was Einstein Right? Testing Relativity at the Centenary
2005
Cited alongside, same era.
A. Karch and L. Randall, Phys. Rev. Lett. 95
2005
Cited alongside, same era.
A. Zhuk, Conventional cosmology from multidimensional models
2007
Cited alongside, same era.
M. Eingorn and A. Zhuk, Phys. Rev. D 80
2009
Cited alongside, same era.
M. Eingorn and A. Zhuk, Classical Quantum Gravity 27
2010
Cited alongside, same era.
V. D. Ivashchuk, Spherically-symmetric solutions with a chain of n internal Ricci-flat spaces
2010
Later among the works it cites.
J. P. de Leon, Grav. Cosmol. 15
2010
Later among the works it cites.
J. P. de Leon, Schwarzschild-like exteriors for stars in Kaluza-Klein gravity
2010
Later among the works it cites.
M. Eingorn and A. Zhuk, Classical Quantum Gravity 27
2010
Later among the works it cites.
Bh. Jain and J. Khoury, Cosmological Tests of Gravity
2010
Later among the works it cites.
M. Eingorn and A. Zhuk, Phys. Rev. D 83
2011
Closest in time.
alphaXiv searches the wider corpus for related work and actual follow-ups.
alphaXiv is searching for related work…
In the literature, a different parameterization (in terms of parameters k k and ε \varepsilon ) is commonly used (see, e. g., Ref. [ 4 ] ) in the case of one internal space N = 1 N=1 . The relation between both of these parameterizations is the following: θ = ε k \theta=\varepsilon k and γ 1 ≡ γ = 1 / k \gamma_{1}\equiv\gamma=1/k . Then, θ γ = ε \theta\gamma=\varepsilon and θ ( 1 − τ ) = ε ( k − d ) \theta(1-\tau)=\varepsilon(k-d) , where d ≡ d 1 d\equiv d_{1}
Cited in the paper.
A particular soliton solution was also found in Ref. [ 13 ] . In the case of four external spacetime coordinates and D ′ D^{\prime} internal spatial coordinates, the parameters in the corresponding solution (25) in Ref. [ 13 ] are: q = 2 , p = D ′ q=2,\,p=D^{\prime} and Δ 2 = 2 ( D ′ + 1 ) / ( D ′ + 2 ) \Delta^{2}=2(D^{\prime}+1)/(D^{\prime}+2) . If we rewrite this solution in the isotropic coordinates, then we immediately get the connection with our parameters, namely: γ i = − 1 , i = 1 , … , N , τ = − D ′ , σ = D ′ \gamma_{i}=-1,\,i=1,\ldots,N,\,\tau=-D^{\prime},\,\sigma=D^{\prime} and θ = 2 / [ ( D ′ + 1 ) ( D ′ + 2 ) ] \theta=\sqrt{2/[(D^{\prime}+1)(D^{\prime}+2)]}
Cited in the paper.
It is worth noting the singular nature of τ = 2 \tau=2 , which follows from Eq. ( 20
Cited in the paper.
In the case of one d d -dimensional internal space ( N = 1 N=1 ), we can rewrite this bound with respect to the parameter k k defined in [ 11 ] as | k | ≥ d × 2.3 × 10 4 |k|\geq d\times 2.3\times 10^{4} . This inequality shows that the increase of the number of internal space dimensions d d imposes stronger restrictions on k k
Cited in the paper.
It can be easily seen from Eqs. ( 10
Cited in the paper.
If we rewrite equations of state in the form p i = ( α i − 1 ) ε , i = 0 , … , N p_{i}=(\alpha_{i}-1)\varepsilon\,,\;i=0,\ldots,N , then for the latent solitons we have α 0 = 1 , α i = ( 1 + γ i ) / 2 , i = 1 , … , N \alpha_{0}=1,\,\alpha_{i}=(1+\gamma_{i})/2\,,\;i=1,\ldots,N . For these values of α 0 \alpha_{0} and α i \alpha_{i} , we get on the right-hand side of Eq. (A15) in Ref. [ 1 ] the terms ( γ i d i / 2 ) κ N ρ 3 (\gamma_{i}d_{i}/2)\kappa_{N}\rho_{3} . These terms are dynamical functions because of the dynamical behavior of the energy density ρ 3 \rho_{3} . This results in a violation of the necessary condition for the internal space stabilization
Cited in the paper.