Fetching the paper…
Reading the bibliography…
We have searched for B_{s}^{0}->hh decays, where h stands for a charged or neutral kaon, or a charged pion.
R.A. Fisher, Annals of Eugenics 7
1936
Earlier work this paper cites.
R. Brun et al
1987
Earlier work this paper cites.
H. Albrecht et al
1990
Earlier work this paper cites.
R. Fleischer, Phys. Lett. B 459
1999
Earlier work this paper cites.
M. Gronau and J. L. Rosner, Phys. Lett. B 482
2000
Earlier work this paper cites.
A. Abashian et al
2002
Earlier work this paper cites.
E. Nakano, Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res., Sect. A 494
2002
Earlier work this paper cites.
S. Kurokawa and E. Kikutani, Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res., Sect. A 499
2003
Earlier work this paper cites.
The Fox-Wolfram moments were introduced in G. C. Fox and S. Wolfram, Phys. Rev. Lett. 41
2003
Earlier work this paper cites.
C.-W. Chiang, M. Gronau, J.L. Rosner, and D.A. Suprun, Phys. Rev. D 70
2005
Cited alongside, same era.
W.-S. Hou, M. Nagashima and A. Soddu, Phys. Rev. Lett. 95
2005
Cited alongside, same era.
S. Baek, P. Hamel, D. London, A. Datta, and D. A. Suprun, Phys. Rev. D 71
2005
Cited alongside, same era.
D. London, J. Matias, and J. Virto, Phys. Rev. D 71
2005
Cited alongside, same era.
The K S 0 K_{S}^{0} selection is described in K. -F. Chen et al
2005
Cited alongside, same era.
S. Descotes-Genon, J. Matias, and J. Virto, Phys. Rev. Lett. 97
2006
Cited alongside, same era.
A. Abulencia et al
A. Drutskoy et al
2007
Later among the works it cites.
Y. -T. Tsai et al
2007
Later among the works it cites.
S.-W. Lin et al
2008
Later among the works it cites.
CDF public note in http://www-cdf.fnal.gov/physics/new/bottom/080724.blessed-tagged_BsJPsiPhi_update_prelim/public_note.pdf; V. M. Abazov et al
2008
Later among the works it cites.
K.-F. Chen et al
2008
Later among the works it cites.
C. Amsler et al
2008
Later among the works it cites.
T. Aaltonen et al
2009
Later among the works it cites.
alphaXiv searches the wider corpus for related work and actual follow-ups.
alphaXiv is searching for related work…
2006
Cited alongside, same era.
M. Morello et al
2007
Cited alongside, same era.
A. Drutskoy et al
2007
Cited alongside, same era.
The inclusion of charge-conjugate modes is implied throughout this paper unless explicitly stated
Cited in the paper.
The cross section ( σ \sigma ) of light quark pair production, e + e − → q q ¯ e^{+}e^{-}\to q\bar{q} , is estimated using the leading-order calculation, σ = N c Q f 2 4 π α 2 3 s β [ 1 + 1 − β 2 2 ] \sigma=\frac{N_{c}Q_{f}^{2}4\pi\alpha^{2}}{3s}\beta[1+\frac{1-\beta^{2}}{2}] , where N c N_{c} is the number of colors, Q f Q_{f} is the charge of the quark, α \alpha is the fine structure constant, s s is the total enegy squared, and β \beta is velocity of the quark in the center of mass frame divided by the speed of light. The value of 2.446 nb is the cross section sum for the four light quark pairs
Cited in the paper.
For the ℛ \cal{R} selection, we use a value close to the CDF measurement [ 12 ] for ℬ ( B s 0 → K + K − ) {\mathcal{B}}(B^{0}_{s}\to K^{+}K^{-}) . For B s 0 → K − π + B_{s}^{0}\to K^{-}\pi^{+} and B s 0 → K 0 K ¯ 0 B^{0}_{s}\to K^{0}\bar{K}^{0} , we naively assume that by replacing a spectator s s quark with a d d quark we should obtain branching fractions similar to those of B d 0 → π + π − B^{0}_{d}\to\pi^{+}\pi^{-} and B d 0 → K 0 π 0 B^{0}_{d}\to K^{0}\pi^{0} , respectively. The decay B s 0 → π + π − B^{0}_{s}\to\pi^{+}\pi^{-} is Okubo-Zweig-Iizuka suppressed and the branching fraction should be one to two orders of magnitude smaller than that of the other three modes. We also compared our assumed values for the four decay modes with theoretical predictions, given in H.-Y. Cheng and C.-K. Chua, Phys. Rev. D 80
Cited in the paper.
R. Louvot et al
2009
Later among the works it cites.
A. Drutskoy et al. (Belle Collaboration) Phys. Rev D 81
2010
Closest in time.