Fetching the paper…
Reading the bibliography…
We present the results of a search for pair production of the supersymmetric partner of the top quark (the stop quark $\tilde{t}_{1}$) decaying to a $b$-quark and a chargino $\chargino$ with a subsequent $\chargino$ decay into a neutralino $\neutralino$, lepton $\ell$, and neutrino $\nu$.
F. James and M. Roos, Comput. Phys. Commun. 10
1975
Earlier work this paper cites.
J. Ellis and S. Rudaz, Phys. Lett. B 128
1983
Earlier work this paper cites.
H. E. Haber and G. L. Kane, Phys. Rep. 117
1985
Earlier work this paper cites.
D. E. Goldberg, Genetic Algorithms in Search, Optimization and Machine Learning
1989
Earlier work this paper cites.
W. Beenakker et al
1998
Earlier work this paper cites.
W. Beenakker et al
1999
Earlier work this paper cites.
J. M. Campbell and R. K. Ellis, Phys. Rev. D 60
1999
Earlier work this paper cites.
T. Junk, Nucl. Instrum. Methods A 434
1999
Earlier work this paper cites.
T. Sjöstrand et al
2001
Cited alongside, same era.
M. L. Mangano et al
2001
Cited alongside, same era.
J. Pumplin et al
2002
Cited alongside, same era.
A.L. Read, J. Phys. G 28
2002
Cited alongside, same era.
E. Gerchtein and M. Paulini, CDF detector simulation framework and performance
2003
Cited alongside, same era.
C. Balazs, M. Carena, and C. E. M. Wagner, Phys. Rev. D 70
2004
Cited alongside, same era.
M. Cacciari et al
2004
Cited alongside, same era.
D. Acosta et al
2005
Later among the works it cites.
D. Acosta et al
2005
Later among the works it cites.
A. Bhatti et al
2006
Later among the works it cites.
F. Canelli et al
2007
Later among the works it cites.
D. Glenzinski et al
2008
Later among the works it cites.
T. Affolder et al
2009
Closest in time.
W. Johnson, Ph.D. thesis, University of California, Davis, 2010
2010
Closest in time.
alphaXiv searches the wider corpus for related work and actual follow-ups.
alphaXiv is searching for related work…
2005
Cited alongside, same era.
CDF uses a cylindrical coordinate system with the z z axis along the proton beam axis. θ \theta is the polar angle relative to the proton beam direction, and ϕ \phi is the azimuthal angle. Pseudorapidity is defined as η ≡ − ln ( tan θ 2 ) \eta\equiv-\ln(\tan\frac{\theta}{2}) , while transverse momenta and energies of particles are defined as p T = | p | sin θ p_{T}=|p|\sin\theta and E T = E sin θ E_{T}=E\sin\theta respectively
Cited in the paper.
The missing transverse energy is defined as / E T = | / E → T | = | − ∑ i E T i n i → | \,/\!\!\!\!E_{T}=|\vec{\,/\!\!\!\!E}_{T}|=|-\sum_{i}E_{T}^{i}\vec{n_{i}}| where n → i \vec{n}_{i} is a unit vector in the plane transverse to the beam direction and that points from the event vertex to the i i -th calorimeter tower. The missing transverse energy is corrected for the escaping muon momenta when muon candidates are present
Cited in the paper.
The lepton is defined as isolated, if the energy deposit within R = 0.4 R=0.4 cone of the lepton momentum p T p_{T} is less than 10% of the lepton p T p_{T}
Cited in the paper.
The missing transverse energy significance is defined as / E T s i g = / E T / ∑ E T \,/\!\!\!\!E_{T}^{sig}=\,/\!\!\!\!E_{T}/\sqrt{\sum E_{T}} , where ∑ E T \sum E_{T} is the scalar transverse energy sum over all calorimeter towers. ∑ E T \sum E_{T} is corrected in an identical manner to the / E T \,/\!\!\!\!E_{T}
Cited in the paper.