Fetching the paper…
Reading the bibliography…
I discuss a method to model the instrumental response of the CMS and ATLAS detectors at high transverse missing energies to dominant standard model V+jets backgrounds, where V is a Z, gamma or W, using multi-jet QCD events.
J. Wess and B. Zumino, Nucl. Phys. B 70
1972
Earlier work this paper cites.
A. H. Chamseddine, R. Arnowitt, and P. Nath, Phys. Rev. Lett. 49
1982
Earlier work this paper cites.
A. D. Martin, R. G. Roberts, W. J. Stirling and R. S. Thorne, Eur. Phys. J. C 14
2000
Earlier work this paper cites.
Models with extra dimensions also lead to signatures with large E T / E_{T}\hskip-11.09654pt/\hskip 4.2679pt at the LHC: N. Arkani-Hamed, S. Dimopoulos, and G.R. Dvali, Phys. Lett. B 429
2001
Earlier work this paper cites.
A. Abachi et al
2002
Earlier work this paper cites.
For example, models of little Higgs with T T -Parity: N. Arkani-Hamed, A.G. Cohen, H. Georgi, Phys. Lett. B 513
2003
Earlier work this paper cites.
M. L. Mangano, M. Moretti, F. Piccinini, R. Pittau and A. D. Polosa, JHEP 0307
2004
Cited alongside, same era.
J. Dunkley et al
2005
Cited alongside, same era.
A. Abulencia et al
2005
Cited alongside, same era.
2006
Cited alongside, same era.
T. Sjöstrand, S. Mrenna and P. Skands, JHEP 0605
2006
Cited alongside, same era.
The W W +jets and t t ¯ t\bar{t} +jets processes are studied in the l l +jets+ E T / E_{T}\hskip-11.09654pt/\hskip 4.2679pt signature and treated in the same manner in the paper. In a few places, where differences between the two processes are important, they are discussed separately
V. Pavlunin and D. Stuart, Phys. Rev. D 78
2008
Later among the works it cites.
The CMS collaboration, S. Chatrchyan et al
2008
Later among the works it cites.
For a recent review of jet reconstruction and calibration see S.D. Ellis et al
2008
Later among the works it cites.
For a recent review see J. M. Campbell, J. W. Huston, W. J. Stirling, Hard Interactions of Quarks and Gluons: a Primer for LHC Physics, Rep. Prog. Phys. 70
2009
Closest in time.
G.L. Kane, G.A. Ladinsky, C.P. Yuan, Phys. Rev. D 45
2009
Closest in time.
alphaXiv searches the wider corpus for related work and actual follow-ups.
alphaXiv is searching for related work…
Cited in the paper.
Pseudo-rapidity is η = − ln [ tan ( θ / 2 ) ] \eta=-\ln[\tan(\theta/2)] , where θ \theta is the particle’s polar angle to the beam line
Cited in the paper.
The start-up s \sqrt{s} of p p pp collisions at LHC is expected to be lower now. For consistency with the previous study forward-modeling , I use the same ALPGEN samples for s \sqrt{s} of 14 TeV that were used in Ref. forward-modeling . The method has also been tested for lower center-of-mass energies
Cited in the paper.
The Minimal Supergravity is a restricted model of supersymmetry characterized by only five free parameters defined at the grand unification scale: m 0 m_{0} , m 1 / 2 m_{1/2} , A 0 A_{0} , tan β \beta , sign( μ \mu ). For LM4 (LM1) benchmarks they are set to 210 (60) GeV, 285 (250) GeV, 0 (0), 10 (10), + (+). The total LM4 cross-section is 25.1 pb (NLO), with σ \sigma [Z( l + l − l^{+}l^{-} )+jets)] ∼ 0.6 \sim 0.6 pb. The total LM1 cross-section is 54.9 pb (NLO); about a third of it includes one or more leptons in the final state. For more information see G.L. Bayatian et al
Cited in the paper.
Energy depositions in the calorimeters from electrons [ Z ( e e ) Z(ee) +jets and e e +jets+ E T / E_{T}\hskip-11.09654pt/\hskip 4.2679pt ] and photons ( γ \gamma +jets) are reconstructed as jets. Such jets are well-measured since most of their energy is collected by the electromagnetic calorimeter. In order to avoid double counting the energy depositions from electrons and photons in E T / E_{T}\hskip-11.09654pt/\hskip 4.2679pt , only jets are used in E T / E_{T}\hskip-11.09654pt/\hskip 4.2679pt for final states with electrons or photons. In J T J_{T} and N J N_{J} measurements, jets from electrons and photons are not used
Cited in the paper.
This is a simple model of jet losses that allows to study how the method performs if there are other sources of jet inefficiency, for example, more uniform in η \eta and ϕ \phi
Cited in the paper.
The contribution from b b -jets to the bias in artificial E T / E_{T}\hskip-11.09654pt/\hskip 4.2679pt prediction is smaller than that due to differences in N J N_{J} and J T J_{T} spectra between t t ¯ t\bar{t} +jets and QCD. Resolution effects specific to higher track multiplicity b b -jets are not simulated in this study
Cited in the paper.