Fetching the paper…
Reading the bibliography…
We set up a canonical Hamiltonian formulation for a theory of gravity based on a Lagrangian density made up of the Hilbert-Palatini term and, instead of the Holst term, the Nieh-Yan topological density.
A. Ashtekar, New Variables For Classical And Quantum Gravity, Phys. Rev. Lett. 57
1987
Earlier work this paper cites.
J. Fernando G. Barbero, Real Ashtekar Variables for Lorentzian Signature Space-times, Phys. Rev. D51
1995
Earlier work this paper cites.
S. Holst, Barbero’s Hamiltonian Derived from a Generalized Hilbert-Palatini Action, Phys. Rev. D53
1996
Earlier work this paper cites.
Giorgio Immirzi, Real and Complex Connections for Canonical Gravity, Class. Quant. Grav. 14
1997
Earlier work this paper cites.
H. T. Nieh and M. L. Yan, An Identity In Riemann-Cartan Geometry, J. Math. Phys. 23
1997
Cited alongside, same era.
R. Gambini, O. Obregon, J. Pullin, Yang-Mills Analogues of the Immirzi Ambiguity, Phys. Rev. D59
1999
Cited alongside, same era.
Nuno Barros e Sa, Hamiltonian Analysis of General Relativity with the Immirzi Parameter, Int. J. Mod. Phys. D10
2000
Cited alongside, same era.
Simone Mercuri, Fermions in Ashtekar-Barbero Connections Formalism for Arbitrary Values of the Immirzi Parameter, Phys. Rev. D73
2006
Cited alongside, same era.
Laurent Freidel, Djordje Minic and Tatsu Takeuchi, Quantum Gravity, Torsion, Parity Violation and all that, Phys. Rev. D72
2008
Closest in time.
Romesh K. Kaul, Holst Actions for Supergravity Theories, Phys. Rev. D77
2008
Closest in time.
2008
Closest in time.
alphaXiv searches the wider corpus for related work and actual follow-ups.
alphaXiv is searching for related work…