Fetching the paper…
Reading the bibliography…
We introduce the notion of quantum computational webs: These are quantum states universal for measurement-based computation which can be built up from a collection of simple primitives.
H.-J. Briegel and R. Raussendorf, Phys. Rev. Lett. 86
2001
Earlier work this paper cites.
R. Raussendorf and H.-J. Briegel, Phys. Rev. Lett. 86
2002
Earlier work this paper cites.
M. B. Ruskai, S. Szarek, and E. Werner, Lin. Alg. Appl. 347
2002
Earlier work this paper cites.
O. Mandel et al., Nature 425
2003
Earlier work this paper cites.
P. Aliferis and D. W. Leung, Phys. Rev. A 70
2004
Earlier work this paper cites.
F. Verstraete and J. I. Cirac, Phys. Rev. A 70
2004
Earlier work this paper cites.
M. Hein, J. Eisert, and H.-J. Briegel, Phys. Rev. A 69
2005
Cited alongside, same era.
M. Borhai and D. Loss, Phys. Rev. A 71
2005
Cited alongside, same era.
Y. Miroshnychenko et al., Nature 442
2006
Cited alongside, same era.
D. Gross and J. Eisert, Phys. Rev. Lett. 98
2007
Cited alongside, same era.
R. Hanson et al., Rev. Mod. Phys. 79
2007
Cited alongside, same era.
M. Fannes, B. Nachtergaele, and R. F. Werner, Commun. Math. Phys. 144
2007
Cited alongside, same era.
M. Hein, W. Dür, J. Eisert, R. Raussendorf, M. Van den Nest, and H.-J. Briegel, quant-ph/0602096
Cited in the paper.
Note that for the definition of a qubit wire as such, we do not require being able to compensate randomness of outcomes by exploiting a finite group structure of the by-product operators
Cited in the paper.
Note that our definition differs from the conventional one by the action of a local Hadamard gate on every site
Cited in the paper.
Away from (and independently of) the boundaries, an MPS is completely specified by the matrices Eq. ( 3
Cited in the paper.
We can now prove the earlier claim that in the normal form Eq. ( 3
Cited in the paper.
More generally, the method sketched above may be implemented as soon as there is some basis { | 0 θ ⟩ , | 1 θ ⟩ } \{\mbox{$|0_{\theta}\rangle$},\mbox{$|1_{\theta}\rangle$}\} s.t. A [ 0 θ ] , A [ 1 θ ] A[0_{\theta}],A[1_{\theta}] generate a finite group (up to scalars). It can be shown that whenever one such basis exists, there is a one-parameter set of bases with the same property upcoming . This gives rise to continuous families of wires in which randomness can be compensated by the same method
Cited in the paper.
D. Gross, J. Eisert, N. Schuch, and D. Perez-Garcia, Phys. Rev. A 76
2008
Closest in time.
B. Vaucher, A. Nunnenkamp, and D. Jaksch, New J. Phys. 10
2008
Closest in time.
G. K. Brennen and A. Miyake, Phys. Rev. Lett. 101
2008
Closest in time.
P. Barmettler at al., Phys. Rev. A 78
2008
Closest in time.
H. J. Kimble, Nature 453
2008
Closest in time.
D. Gross, S. T. Flammia, and J. Eisert, Phys. Rev. Lett. 102
2009
Closest in time.
alphaXiv searches the wider corpus for related work and actual follow-ups.
alphaXiv is searching for related work…