Fetching the paper…
Reading the bibliography…
We define the direct and reverse secret-key capacities of a memoryless quantum channel as the optimal rates that entanglement-based quantum key distribution protocols can reach by using a single forward classical communication (direct reconciliation) or a single feedback classical communication (reverse reconciliation).
A. K. Ekert, Phys. Rev. Lett. 67
1991
Earlier work this paper cites.
D. F. Walls and G. J. Milburn, Quantum Optics
1994
Earlier work this paper cites.
B. Schumacher and M. A. Nielsen, Phys. Rev. A 54
1997
Earlier work this paper cites.
M. A. Nielsen and I. L. Chuang, Quantum computation and quantum information
2000
Earlier work this paper cites.
A. Holevo and R. F. Werner, Phys. Rev. A 63
2001
Earlier work this paper cites.
F. Grosshans et al
2003
Cited alongside, same era.
R. Renner, Ph.D. thesis, ETH Zürich, 2005; R. Renner, N. Gisin, and B. Kraus, Phys. Rev. A 72
2005
Cited alongside, same era.
I. Devetak, IEEE Trans. Inf. Th
2005
Cited alongside, same era.
I. Devetak and P. W. Shor, Comm. Math. Phys. 256
2005
Cited alongside, same era.
A. Serafini et al
2005
Cited alongside, same era.
Cited in the paper.
For simplicity, we include error correction and privacy amplification (which correspond to a classical channel) into the decoding POVM
Cited in the paper.
In the formulas for K ▶ ( 𝒩 ) K_{\blacktriangleright}(\mathcal{N}) , K ◀ ( 𝒩 ) K_{\blacktriangleleft}(\mathcal{N}) , K ▶ ⊗ ( 𝒩 ) K_{\blacktriangleright}^{\otimes}(\mathcal{N}) and K ◀ ⊗ ( 𝒩 ) K_{\blacktriangleleft}^{\otimes}(\mathcal{N}) we implicitly assume max x = max { 0 , x } \max x=\max\{0,x\}
Cited in the paper.
Detailed derivations will be presented elsewhere
Cited in the paper.
In the formulas for K ▶ ( 𝒩 ) K_{\blacktriangleright}(\mathcal{N}) and K ▶ ⊗ ( 𝒩 ) K_{\blacktriangleright}^{\otimes}(\mathcal{N}) , the information quantities refer to the classical-quantum state ω X T B n E n = ∑ t , x p ( t | x ) p ( x ) | x ⟩ ⟨ x | X ⊗ | t ⟩ ⟨ t | T ⊗ ρ B n E n ( x ) \omega_{XTB^{n}E^{n}}=\sum_{t,x}p(t|x)p(x)\left|x\right\rangle\left\langle x\right|_{X}\otimes\left|t\right\rangle\left\langle t\right|_{T}\otimes\rho_{B^{n}E^{n}}(x) , where ρ B n E n ( x ) \rho_{B^{n}E^{n}}(x) is Bob and Eve’s state conditioned to the outcome x x . A corresponding state ω Y T A n E n \omega_{YTA^{n}E^{n}} must be considered for K ◀ ( 𝒩 ) K_{\blacktriangleleft}(\mathcal{N}) and K ◀ ⊗ ( 𝒩 ) K_{\blacktriangleleft}^{\otimes}(\mathcal{N})
Cited in the paper.
R. García-Patrón and N. Cerf, arXiv:0806.3954
Cited in the paper.
I. Devetak and A. Winter, Phys. Rev. Lett. 93
2005
Later among the works it cites.
A. S. Holevo, Prob. of Inf. Transm. 43
2006
Later among the works it cites.
M. M. Wolf et al
2007
Later among the works it cites.
S. Pirandola et al
2008
Closest in time.
alphaXiv searches the wider corpus for related work and actual follow-ups.
alphaXiv is searching for related work…