Fetching the paper…

Reading the bibliography…

A short comparison between m_T2 and m_CT · Around

2008

A short comparison between m_T2 and m_CT

Serna, Mario

Original
PDF
Post on X

Understand

We compare m_T2 with m_CT; both are kinematic variables designed to find relationships between masses of pair-produced new states with symmetric decay chains.

We find that for massless visible particles m_CT equals m_T2 in a particular limit.
We identify advantages and disadvantages to the use of each variable.
Tovey's paper on m_CT also introduced a powerful concept of extracting mass information from an analysis at intermediate stages of a symmetric decay chain.

Built on

C. G. Lester and D. J. Summers, Measuring masses of semi-invisibly decaying particles pair produced at hadron colliders
1999
Earlier work this paper cites.
A. Barr, C. Lester, and P. Stephens, m(T2): The truth behind the glamour
2003
Earlier work this paper cites.
C. Lester and A. Barr, MTGEN : Mass scale measurements in pair-production at colliders
2007
Earlier work this paper cites.

Similar

D. R. Tovey, On measuring the masses of pair-produced semi-invisibly decaying particles at hadron colliders
2008
Cited alongside, same era.
W. S. Cho, K. Choi, Y. G. Kim, and C. B. Park, Gluino Stransverse Mass
2008
Cited alongside, same era.
G. G. Ross and M. Serna, Mass Determination of New States at Hadron Colliders
Original
Cited in the paper.
Atlas mt2 wiki c++ library
Cited in the paper.

Then

W. S. Cho, K. Choi, Y. G. Kim, and C. B. Park, Measuring superparticle masses at hadron collider using the transverse mass kink
2008
Closest in time.
A. J. Barr, B. Gripaios, and C. G. Lester, Weighing Wimps with Kinks at Colliders: Invisible Particle Mass Measurements from Endpoints
2008
Closest in time.

Beyond the bibliography

alphaXiv searches the wider corpus for related work and actual follow-ups.

Open on alphaXiv

alphaXiv is searching for related work…