Fetching the paper…
Reading the bibliography…
We propose the improved decoy state quantum key distribution incorporating finite statistics due to the finite code length and report on its demonstration.
C. H. Bennett and G. Brassard, in Proceedings of IEEE International Conference on Computers, Systems, and Signal Processing, Bangalore, India, 1984
1984
Earlier work this paper cites.
L. Carter and M. Wegman, J. Computer and System Sciences 18
1994
Earlier work this paper cites.
R. G. Gallager, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA (1963). D. J. C. MacKey, IEEE Trans. Inform. Theory 45
1999
Earlier work this paper cites.
D. Mayers, in Advances in Cryptology — Proceedings of Crypto ’96
2000
Earlier work this paper cites.
N. Gisin et al
2002
Earlier work this paper cites.
B. Huttner et al
2002
Earlier work this paper cites.
W.-Y. Hwang, Phys. Rev. Lett. 91
2003
Earlier work this paper cites.
D. Gottesman et al
2004
Earlier work this paper cites.
A. Tanaka et al
2004
Cited alongside, same era.
C. Gobby, Z. L. Yuan, and A. J. Shields, Appl. Phys. Lett. 84
2004
Cited alongside, same era.
T. Kimura et al
2004
Cited alongside, same era.
X.-B. Wang, Phys. Rev. A 72
2005
Cited alongside, same era.
H.-K. Lo, X. Ma, and K. Chen, Phys. Rev. Lett. 94
2005
Cited alongside, same era.
A. Tanaka et al
2005
Cited alongside, same era.
X. Ma et al
2006
Cited alongside, same era.
J. W. Harrington et al
Y. Zhao et al
2006
Later among the works it cites.
M. Hayashi, Phys. Rev. A 74
2006
Later among the works it cites.
A. Tanaka et al
2006
Later among the works it cites.
D. Rosenberg et al
2007
Closest in time.
T. Schmitt-Manderbach et al
2007
Closest in time.
C.-Z. Peng et al
2007
Closest in time.
Z. L. Yuan, A. W. Sharpe, and A. J. Shields, Appl. Phys. Lett. 90
2007
Closest in time.
alphaXiv searches the wider corpus for related work and actual follow-ups.
alphaXiv is searching for related work…
Cited in the paper.
M. Hayashi, Phys. Rev. A, to appear; quant-ph/0702250
Cited in the paper.
More correctly, the errors of each basis other than the detector dark count events may occur even when the quantum channel does not cause any errors. Here, we neglect such error probability. This assumption is not harmful to the security arguments. On the contrary, this means that these errors are under the full control of Eve
Cited in the paper.
J. Hasegawa et al
Cited in the paper.
M. Hayashi, quant-ph/0702251
Cited in the paper.